Contents

Irrationality of the dilogarithm at 1/31/3

Ruiyi Zhang Independent Researcher, Columbia, Maryland, USA
Abstract.

We prove that Li2⁡(1/3)\operatorname{Li}_{2}(1/3) is irrational. Irrationality of Li2⁡(1/s)\operatorname{Li}_{2}(1/s) was known for integers s≤−5s\leq-5 and s≥6s\geq 6 by work of Hata and of Rhin and Viola, and Prellberg recently proved it for s=−4,5,−3s=-4,5,-3. We define polynomials Gm⁢(T)G_{m}(T) with rational coefficients by an interpolation determinant. The rank of this determinant modulo primes pp with m/8<p<5⁢m/4m/8<p<5m/4 bounds the denominators of the coefficients. A concavity inequality for a logarithmic energy, combined with the inversion v↦3/vv\mapsto 3/v, bounds Gm⁢(Li2⁡(1/3))G_{m}(\operatorname{Li}_{2}(1/3)). Interval arithmetic is used only for the energy and the potentials of a printed reference measure, on a uniform dyadic subdivision. The integral of the local rank function is a rational sum over 7676 printed affine pieces. The coefficients of G4G_{4} and the 9×99\times 9 determinant modulo 1717 are printed and can be checked by hand. A congruence modulo 1717 shows that Gm⁢(ξ)≠0G_{m}(\xi)\neq 0 for every rational ξ\xi and m=4⋅17tm=4\cdot 17^{t}, tt large in terms of ξ\xi.

Key words and phrases:
dilogarithm, irrationality, interpolation determinant, logarithmic energy, interval arithmetic
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 11J72; Secondary 33B30

1. Introduction

For |z|≤1|z|\leq 1 let Li2⁡(z)=∑k≥1zk/k2\operatorname{Li}_{2}(z)=\sum_{k\geq 1}z^{k}/k^{2}. Hata [5, Theorem 1.1] proved that Li2⁡(1/s)\operatorname{Li}_{2}(1/s) is irrational for every integer s≤−5s\leq-5 and every s≥7s\geq 7. Rhin and Viola settled s=6s=6 by their permutation group method [10, Section 6], and later treated negative arguments [11, Theorem 2.1 and Section 4]. Viola and Zudilin [13] introduced a six-parameter family of double integrals for dilogarithmic values. In 2024 Calegari, Dimitrov and Tang [2, Remark 2.8.2 and Section 15.2] listed the integers still open: s∈{−4,−3,−2,2,3,4,5}s\in\{-4,-3,-2,2,3,4,5\}. Prellberg’s 2026 preprint [9, Theorem 1.1] proves the cases s=−4,5,−3s=-4,5,-3. We prove the case s=3s=3. Our linear forms are values of an interpolation determinant of size 9⁢n9n, in place of the double integrals of [5, 9, 10, 13]. The rank of this determinant modulo primes controls the denominators of its coefficients.

Theorem 1.

The number Li2⁡(1/3)\operatorname{Li}_{2}(1/3) is irrational.

By Landen’s identity [8, (25.12.3)], Li2⁡(1/3)+Li2⁡(−1/2)=−12⁢log2⁡(3/2)\operatorname{Li}_{2}(1/3)+\operatorname{Li}_{2}(-1/2)=-\frac{1}{2}\log^{2}(3/2), and log⁡(3/2)\log(3/2) is transcendental by the Hermite–Lindemann theorem, a special case of [1, Theorem 1.4]. So Landen’s identity does not reduce the case s=3s=3 to the case s=−2s=-2.

Put θ=Li2⁡(1/3)\theta=\operatorname{Li}_{2}(1/3) and m=4⁢nm=4n. Section 2 defines Gm⁢(T)∈ℚ⁢[T]G_{m}(T)\in\mathbb{Q}[T] by an interpolation determinant. Sections 3 and 4 give

deg⁡Gm≤m⁢by Lemma 2.1,Km⁢Gm⁢(T)∈ℤ⁢[T],Km∈ℚ>0,\displaystyle\deg G_{m}\leq m\ \text{by Lemma~{}\ref{lem:moment-identity}},% \qquad K_{m}G_{m}(T)\in\mathbb{Z}[T],\qquad K_{m}\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0},
lim supm→∞4∣mlog⁡Kmm2≤τ<3.87273,\displaystyle\limsup_{\begin{subarray}{c}m\to\infty\\ 4\mid m\end{subarray}}\frac{\log K_{m}}{m^{2}}\leq\tau<3.87273,
(1.1) log⁡|Gm⁢(θ)|≤−3.8757⁢m2+C⁢m⁢log⁡m(m=4⁢n≥4).\displaystyle\log|G_{m}(\theta)|\leq-3.8757\,m^{2}+C\,m\log m\quad(m=4n\geq 4).

The exact value of τ\tau is in (3.12), and 3.87573.8757 is a lower bound for the constant of (4.5). The finite constant CC of Lemma 4.4 depends only on the reference measure. Since 3.87273<3.87573.87273<3.8757, the quadratic exponent is negative. If θ=u/q0\theta=u/q_{0} with q0>0q_{0}>0, then q0m⁢Km⁢Gm⁢(θ)∈ℤq_{0}^{m}K_{m}G_{m}(\theta)\in\mathbb{Z}. Section 5 shows that it is nonzero for m=4⋅17tm=4\cdot 17^{t} and tt large, and (1.1) shows that it tends to zero.

The only numerical margin in the proof is α0−τ>0\alpha_{0}-\tau>0. The size of CC is not used. Lemma 4.2 is computer-assisted. It is proved by interval arithmetic on the reference measure of Tables C.1 and C.2, over the uniform subdivision of Lemma C.1. The integral (3.8) is an exact sum over the 7676 affine pieces of Table A.2, each determined by the explicit lines of Table A. Tables 2.1, A and A.2 and (5.2) can be checked by hand. Python scripts recheck Lemma 4.2 and part of the remaining proof (Appendix D). Apart from this lemma, the proof is complete without them.

The proof uses three classical inputs.

Fact 1 (prime number theorem [4, Theorems 6 and 420, §§1.8 and 22.4]).

θCh⁢(y)=∑p≤ylog⁡p\theta_{\rm Ch}(y)=\sum_{p\leq y}\log p satisfies θCh⁢(y)/y→1\theta_{\rm Ch}(y)/y\to 1 as y→∞y\to\infty.

Only this qualitative form is used.

Fact 2 ([12, Lemma I.1.8]).

If σ\sigma is a real compactly supported signed measure of total mass zero with ∬|log⁡|u−w|⁢|d|⁢σ⁢|(u)⁢d|⁢σ|⁢(w)<∞\iint|\log|u-w||\,d|\sigma|(u)\,d|\sigma|(w)<\infty, then ∬log⁡|u−w|⁢d⁢σ⁢(u)⁢𝑑σ⁢(w)≤0\iint\log|u-w|\,d\sigma(u)\,d\sigma(w)\leq 0.

A short proof is given in Appendix E.

Fact 3 (Cauchy–Vandermonde [7, Theorem 25], [3, Section 2]).

For s=(s1,…,sm)s=(s_{1},\ldots,s_{m}), v=(v1,…,vL)v=(v_{1},\ldots,v_{L}) and h=L−m≥0h=L-m\geq 0,

det(((si′+vb)−1)1≤i′≤m, 1≤b≤L(vbℓ−1)1≤ℓ≤h, 1≤b≤L)=Δ⁢(s)⁢Δ⁢(v)∏i′,b(si′+vb),Δ⁢(u)=∏i<j(uj−ui).\det\begin{pmatrix}((s_{i^{\prime}}+v_{b})^{-1})_{1\leq i^{\prime}\leq m,\,1% \leq b\leq L}\\ (v_{b}^{\ell-1})_{1\leq\ell\leq h,\,1\leq b\leq L}\end{pmatrix}=\frac{\Delta(s% )\Delta(v)}{\prod_{i^{\prime},b}(s_{i^{\prime}}+v_{b})},\qquad\Delta(u)=\prod_% {i<j}(u_{j}-u_{i}).

A proof, including the sign, is given in the proof of Lemma 2.2.

The use of AI tools is described at the end of the paper.

2. The determinant

Put a=3a=3. For n≥1n\geq 1 let

m=4⁢n,σ=k=h=n,L=m+h,I={σ+k,…,σ+k+m−1},J={σ,…,σ+2⁢m+h−1},Λ={1,…,h},\begin{gathered}m=4n,\qquad\sigma=k=h=n,\qquad L=m+h,\\ I=\{\sigma+k,\ldots,\sigma+k+m-1\},\quad J=\{\sigma,\ldots,\sigma+2m+h-1\},% \quad\Lambda=\{1,\ldots,h\},\end{gathered}

all ordered increasingly. For j≥0j\geq 0 put

tj=∑u=1jaj−uu,bj=∑u=1jaj−uu2;t0=b0=0.t_{j}=\sum_{u=1}^{j}\frac{a^{j-u}}{u},\qquad b_{j}=\sum_{u=1}^{j}\frac{a^{j-u}% }{u^{2}};\qquad t_{0}=b_{0}=0.

For i∈Ii\in I, j∈Jj\in J and ℓ∈Λ\ell\in\Lambda let

Ci⁢j={(ai−aj)/(j−i),i≠j,0,i=j,Bi⁢j={(ti−tj)/(j−i),i≠j,bi,i=j,Ai⁢j=ai⁢δi⁢j,Vℓ⁢j=1j+ℓ,Mi⁢j=∫01∫01xi⁢yjx⁢y−3⁢𝑑x⁢𝑑y,\begin{gathered}C_{ij}=\begin{cases}(a^{i}-a^{j})/(j-i),&i\neq j,\\ 0,&i=j,\end{cases}\quad B_{ij}=\begin{cases}(t_{i}-t_{j})/(j-i),&i\neq j,\\ b_{i},&i=j,\end{cases}\\ A_{ij}=a^{i}\delta_{ij},\qquad V_{\ell j}=\frac{1}{j+\ell},\qquad M_{ij}=\int_% {0}^{1}\!\int_{0}^{1}\frac{x^{i}y^{j}}{xy-3}\,dx\,dy,\end{gathered}

and put

(2.1) Gm⁢(T)=det(CB−T⁢AV),G_{m}(T)=\det\begin{pmatrix}C\\ B-TA\\ V\end{pmatrix},

a determinant of size 2⁢m+h=9⁢n2m+h=9n. For an indeterminate aa the same formulas define

Gm⁢(T;a)=det(C⁢(a)B⁢(a)−T⁢A⁢(a)V)∈ℚ⁢[a,T];Gm⁢(T)=Gm⁢(T;3).G_{m}(T;a)=\det\begin{pmatrix}C(a)\\ B(a)-TA(a)\\ V\end{pmatrix}\in\mathbb{Q}[a,T];\qquad G_{m}(T)=G_{m}(T;3).
Lemma 2.1.

One has Gm∈ℚ⁢[T]G_{m}\in\mathbb{Q}[T], deg⁡Gm≤m\deg G_{m}\leq m, and

(2.2) M=B+log⁡(2/3)⁢C−θ⁢A,Gm⁢(θ)=det(CMV).M=B+\log(2/3)\,C-\theta A,\qquad G_{m}(\theta)=\det\begin{pmatrix}C\\ M\\ V\end{pmatrix}.
Proof.

Write λ=log⁡(2/3)\lambda=\log(2/3) and

𝔪j=∫01uju−3⁢𝑑u,𝔫j=∫01uj⁢log⁡(1/u)u−3⁢𝑑u.\mathfrak{m}_{j}=\int_{0}^{1}\frac{u^{j}}{u-3}\,du,\qquad\mathfrak{n}_{j}=\int% _{0}^{1}\frac{u^{j}\log(1/u)}{u-3}\,du.

Polynomial division and the geometric series give

𝔪0=λ,𝔫0=−θ,𝔪j=a⁢𝔪j−1+1j,𝔫j=a⁢𝔫j−1+1j2(j≥1),𝔪j=aj⁢λ+tj,𝔫j=bj−aj⁢θ.\begin{gathered}\mathfrak{m}_{0}=\lambda,\quad\mathfrak{n}_{0}=-\theta,\qquad% \mathfrak{m}_{j}=a\mathfrak{m}_{j-1}+\frac{1}{j},\quad\mathfrak{n}_{j}=a% \mathfrak{n}_{j-1}+\frac{1}{j^{2}}\quad(j\geq 1),\\ \mathfrak{m}_{j}=a^{j}\lambda+t_{j},\qquad\mathfrak{n}_{j}=b_{j}-a^{j}\theta.% \end{gathered}

The substitution u=x⁢yu=xy gives

Mi⁢j=𝔪i−𝔪jj−i(i≠j),Mi⁢i=𝔫i.M_{ij}=\frac{\mathfrak{m}_{i}-\mathfrak{m}_{j}}{j-i}\quad(i\neq j),\qquad M_{% ii}=\mathfrak{n}_{i}.

Hence the first identity in (2.2). Add λ\lambda times each CC row to the corresponding row of B−θ⁢AB-\theta A. Only the mm middle rows depend on TT, and their coefficients are rational. ∎

Put r=2/5r=2/5 and γ⁢(ϑ)=r⁢ei⁢ϑ\gamma(\vartheta)=re^{i\vartheta} (0≤ϑ≤2⁢π)(0\leq\vartheta\leq 2\pi). Let [3,1][3,1] be the segment from 33 to 11, and let

Γ=[3,1]+cΓ⁢γ,cΓ=log⁡32⁢π⁢i,\Gamma=[3,1]+c_{\Gamma}\gamma,\qquad c_{\Gamma}=\frac{\log 3}{2\pi i},

a linear combination of paths with complex coefficients. For every integer dd,

(2.3) ∫Γzd−1⁢𝑑z={(1−ad)/d,d≠0,0,d=0.\int_{\Gamma}z^{d-1}\,dz=\begin{cases}(1-a^{d})/d,&d\neq 0,\\ 0,&d=0.\end{cases}

For d≠0d\neq 0 integrate zd/dz^{d}/d on each path. For d=0d=0 the segment gives −log⁡3-\log 3 and the circle gives 2⁢π⁢i⁢cΓ=log⁡32\pi ic_{\Gamma}=\log 3. The total variation is

(2.4) Tr=2+r⁢log⁡3=2.43944⁢…<3.T_{r}=2+r\log 3=2.43944\ldots<3.

With Δ\Delta as in Fact 3, use variables x=(x1,…,xm)x=(x_{1},\ldots,x_{m}), v=(v1,…,vL)v=(v_{1},\ldots,v_{L}) and z=(z1,…,zm)z=(z_{1},\ldots,z_{m}).

Lemma 2.2.

With product differentials d⁢x⁢d⁢v⁢d⁢zdx\,dv\,dz,

(2.5) Gm⁢(θ)=33⁢m2/2−m(m!)2⁢L!⁢∫[0,1]m∫[0,1]L∫ΓmΦ⁢(x,v,z)⁢𝑑z⁢𝑑v⁢𝑑x,G_{m}(\theta)=\frac{3^{3m^{2}/2-m}}{(m!)^{2}L!}\int_{[0,1]^{m}}\int_{[0,1]^{L}% }\int_{\Gamma^{m}}\Phi(x,v,z)\,dz\,dv\,dx,

where

Φ⁢(x,v,z)=Δ⁢(x)2⁢Δ⁢(v)2⁢Δ⁢(z)2⁢∏d=1m∏b=1L(zd−vb)⁢∏i′=1mxi′σ+k+h⁢∏b=1Lvbσ⁢∏d=1mzd−m−k∏i′=1m∏b=1L(3−xi′⁢vb).\Phi(x,v,z)=\frac{\Delta(x)^{2}\Delta(v)^{2}\Delta(z)^{2}\displaystyle\prod_{d% =1}^{m}\prod_{b=1}^{L}(z_{d}-v_{b})\displaystyle\prod_{i^{\prime}=1}^{m}x_{i^{% \prime}}^{\sigma+k+h}\prod_{b=1}^{L}v_{b}^{\sigma}\prod_{d=1}^{m}z_{d}^{-m-k}}% {\displaystyle\prod_{i^{\prime}=1}^{m}\prod_{b=1}^{L}(3-x_{i^{\prime}}v_{b})}.
Proof.

By (2.3), Ci⁢j=ai⁢∫Γzj−i−1⁢𝑑zC_{ij}=a^{i}\int_{\Gamma}z^{j-i-1}\,dz. Put fi⁢(v)=∫01xi/(x⁢v−3)⁢𝑑xf_{i}(v)=\int_{0}^{1}x^{i}/(xv-3)\,dx. Then

Mi⁢j=∫01fi⁢(v)⁢vj⁢𝑑v,Vℓ⁢j=∫01vℓ−1⁢vj⁢𝑑v.M_{ij}=\int_{0}^{1}f_{i}(v)v^{j}\,dv,\qquad V_{\ell j}=\int_{0}^{1}v^{\ell-1}v% ^{j}\,dv.

Set eΔ=m⁢(m−1)/2e_{\Delta}=m(m-1)/2 and 𝐰=(z1,…,zm,v1,…,vL)\mathbf{w}=(z_{1},\ldots,z_{m},v_{1},\ldots,v_{L}). Multilinearity in the rows and antisymmetrization, applied to the LL rows [M;V][M;V], then to the mm rows CC, and then to the mm functions fif_{i}, give

Gm⁢(θ)=1(m!)2⁢L!⁢∫[0,1]m×[0,1]L×ΓmDz⁢Dz⁢v⁢Dx⁢Dx⁢v⁢𝑑x⁢𝑑v⁢𝑑z,G_{m}(\theta)=\frac{1}{(m!)^{2}L!}\int_{[0,1]^{m}\times[0,1]^{L}\times\Gamma^{% m}}D_{z}D_{zv}D_{x}D_{xv}\,dx\,dv\,dz,

where

Dz\displaystyle D_{z} =det(ai⁢zd−i−1)i∈I, 1≤d≤m=(−1)eΔ⁢am⁢(σ+k)+eΔ⁢Δ⁢(z)⁢∏dzd−σ−k−m,\displaystyle=\det(a^{i}z_{d}^{-i-1})_{i\in I,\,1\leq d\leq m}=(-1)^{e_{\Delta% }}a^{m(\sigma+k)+e_{\Delta}}\Delta(z)\prod_{d}z_{d}^{-\sigma-k-m},
Dz⁢v\displaystyle D_{zv} =det(𝐰bj)1≤b≤2⁢m+h,j∈J=(−1)m⁢L⁢Δ⁢(z)⁢Δ⁢(v)⁢∏dzdσ⁢∏bvbσ⁢∏d,b(zd−vb),\displaystyle=\det(\mathbf{w}_{b}^{j})_{1\leq b\leq 2m+h,\,j\in J}=(-1)^{mL}% \Delta(z)\Delta(v)\prod_{d}z_{d}^{\sigma}\prod_{b}v_{b}^{\sigma}\prod_{d,b}(z_% {d}-v_{b}),
Dx\displaystyle D_{x} =det(xi′i)i∈I, 1≤i′≤m=Δ⁢(x)⁢∏i′xi′σ+k,\displaystyle=\det(x_{i^{\prime}}^{i})_{i\in I,\,1\leq i^{\prime}\leq m}=% \Delta(x)\prod_{i^{\prime}}x_{i^{\prime}}^{\sigma+k},
Dx⁢v\displaystyle D_{xv} =det(((xi′⁢vb−3)−1)1≤i′≤m, 1≤b≤L(vbℓ−1)1≤ℓ≤h, 1≤b≤L)=(−1)m⁢L⁢3eΔ⁢Δ⁢(x)⁢Δ⁢(v)⁢∏i′xi′h∏i′,b(3−xi′⁢vb).\displaystyle=\det\begin{pmatrix}((x_{i^{\prime}}v_{b}-3)^{-1})_{1\leq i^{% \prime}\leq m,\,1\leq b\leq L}\\ (v_{b}^{\ell-1})_{1\leq\ell\leq h,\,1\leq b\leq L}\end{pmatrix}=\frac{(-1)^{mL% }3^{e_{\Delta}}\Delta(x)\Delta(v)\prod_{i^{\prime}}x_{i^{\prime}}^{h}}{\prod_{% i^{\prime},b}(3-x_{i^{\prime}}v_{b})}.

The last equality follows from the Cauchy–Vandermonde identity. Explicitly, for si′=−3/xi′s_{i^{\prime}}=-3/x_{i^{\prime}},

det(((xi′⁢vb−3)−1)i′,b(vbℓ−1)ℓ,b)=∏i′xi′−1⁢det(((si′+vb)−1)i′,b(vbℓ−1)ℓ,b),\det\begin{pmatrix}((x_{i^{\prime}}v_{b}-3)^{-1})_{i^{\prime},b}\\ (v_{b}^{\ell-1})_{\ell,b}\end{pmatrix}=\prod_{i^{\prime}}x_{i^{\prime}}^{-1}% \det\begin{pmatrix}((s_{i^{\prime}}+v_{b})^{-1})_{i^{\prime},b}\\ (v_{b}^{\ell-1})_{\ell,b}\end{pmatrix},

and Δ⁢(s)=3eΔ⁢Δ⁢(x)⁢∏i′xi′1−m\Delta(s)=3^{e_{\Delta}}\Delta(x)\prod_{i^{\prime}}x_{i^{\prime}}^{1-m}, ∏i′,b(si′+vb)=(−1)m⁢L⁢∏i′,b(3−xi′⁢vb)⁢∏i′xi′−L\prod_{i^{\prime},b}(s_{i^{\prime}}+v_{b})=(-1)^{mL}\prod_{i^{\prime},b}(3-x_{% i^{\prime}}v_{b})\prod_{i^{\prime}}x_{i^{\prime}}^{-L}. Fact 3 and this row scaling give the formula for Dx⁢vD_{xv}. Continuity covers xi′=0x_{i^{\prime}}=0.

We prove Fact 3 as an identity of rational functions, with si′,vbs_{i^{\prime}},v_{b} independent indeterminates. We use induction on mm, for all h≥0h\geq 0 at once. The case m=0m=0 is the Vandermonde identity. Let m≥1m\geq 1, let v′=(v1,…,vL−1)v^{\prime}=(v_{1},\ldots,v_{L-1}), and let s^i′\widehat{s}_{i^{\prime}} denote ss with si′s_{i^{\prime}} omitted. As a function of vLv_{L}, expansion along the last column writes the determinant as ∑i′(−1)i′+L⁢Mi′/(si′+vL)\sum_{i^{\prime}}(-1)^{i^{\prime}+L}M_{i^{\prime}}/(s_{i^{\prime}}+v_{L}) plus a polynomial of degree at most h−1h-1, where Mi′M_{i^{\prime}} is the minor without row i′i^{\prime} and column LL. The right side is a polynomial of degree L−1=m+h−1L-1=m+h-1 in vLv_{L} divided by ∏i′(si′+vL)\prod_{i^{\prime}}(s_{i^{\prime}}+v_{L}), so it has the same form. By the induction hypothesis for (s^i′,v′)(\widehat{s}_{i^{\prime}},v^{\prime}), Mi′M_{i^{\prime}} is the right side of the fact for (s^i′,v′)(\widehat{s}_{i^{\prime}},v^{\prime}). We have Δ⁢(s)=(−1)i′−1⁢Δ⁢(s^i′)⁢∏j≠i′(sj−si′)\Delta(s)=(-1)^{i^{\prime}-1}\Delta(\widehat{s}_{i^{\prime}})\prod_{j\neq i^{% \prime}}(s_{j}-s_{i^{\prime}}), and Δ⁢(v)=(−1)L−1⁢Δ⁢(v′)⁢∏b<L(si′+vb)\Delta(v)=(-1)^{L-1}\Delta(v^{\prime})\prod_{b<L}(s_{i^{\prime}}+v_{b}) at vL=−si′v_{L}=-s_{i^{\prime}}. Hence, after the factors sj+vL=sj−si′s_{j}+v_{L}=s_{j}-s_{i^{\prime}} (j≠i′)(j\neq i^{\prime}) and si′+vbs_{i^{\prime}}+v_{b} (b<L)(b<L) cancel, the residue of the right side at vL=−si′v_{L}=-s_{i^{\prime}} is

(−1)i′+L⁢Δ⁢(s^i′)⁢Δ⁢(v′)∏j≠i′∏b<L(sj+vb)=(−1)i′+L⁢Mi′.(-1)^{i^{\prime}+L}\frac{\Delta(\widehat{s}_{i^{\prime}})\Delta(v^{\prime})}{% \prod_{j\neq i^{\prime}}\prod_{b<L}(s_{j}+v_{b})}=(-1)^{i^{\prime}+L}M_{i^{% \prime}}.

So the residues agree, and the difference of the two sides is a polynomial in vLv_{L} of degree at most h−1h-1, zero if h=0h=0. It vanishes at the L−1≥hL-1\geq h points vL=vbv_{L}=v_{b}, b<Lb<L, where the determinant has two equal columns and Δ⁢(v)=0\Delta(v)=0. Hence it is zero.

The product of the four factors is (−1)eΔ⁢am⁢(σ+k)+2⁢eΔ⁢Φ(-1)^{e_{\Delta}}a^{m(\sigma+k)+2e_{\Delta}}\Phi. Since m=4⁢nm=4n, eΔ=2⁢n⁢(4⁢n−1)e_{\Delta}=2n(4n-1) is even and m⁢(σ+k)+2⁢eΔ=3⁢m2/2−mm(\sigma+k)+2e_{\Delta}=3m^{2}/2-m. All integrals converge absolutely: 3−x⁢v≥23-xv\geq 2 on [0,1]2[0,1]^{2}, |z|≥r|z|\geq r on Γ\Gamma, and Γ\Gamma has finite variation. ∎

An exact calculation gives

(2.6) G4⁢(T)=967228000000000⁢∑j=04qj⁢Tj,67228000000000=211⁢59⁢75,G_{4}(T)=\frac{9}{67228000000000}\sum_{j=0}^{4}q_{j}T^{j},\qquad 6722800000000% 0=2^{11}5^{9}7^{5},

with the coefficients in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1. The integer coefficients in (2.6).
jj qjq_{j}
0 1139058645746103095456311390586457461030954563
11 −124400937938521703661570-124400937938521703661570
22 509486272807705849983600509486272807705849983600
33 −927382286191365446400000-927382286191365446400000
44 633018449291268096000000633018449291268096000000

3. The divisor

Put

Nden=10⁢n−1,U=11⁢n−1,dℓ=lcm⁡(1,…,ℓ),𝒟m=dNden3⁢m⁢dUn.N_{\mathrm{den}}=10n-1,\qquad U=11n-1,\qquad d_{\ell}=\operatorname{lcm}(1,% \ldots,\ell),\qquad\mathcal{D}_{m}=d_{N_{\mathrm{den}}}^{3m}d_{U}^{n}.

For F∈ℚ⁢[T]F\in\mathbb{Q}[T] let vp⁢(F)=minj⁡vp⁢([Tj]⁢F)v_{p}(F)=\min_{j}v_{p}([T^{j}]F). From now on kk is a running index, and the parameter kk of Section 2 equals nn. Fix the seam R=8R=8. Primes p≤m/Rp\leq m/R are cleared by 𝒟m\mathcal{D}_{m} alone. For primes m/R<p<5⁢m/4m/R<p<5m/4 we use the rank bound of Lemma 3.2.

Lemma 3.1.

For an indeterminate aa,

(3.1) Pm⁢(a,T):=𝒟m⁢Gm⁢(T;a)∈ℤ⁢[a,T].P_{m}(a,T):=\mathcal{D}_{m}G_{m}(T;a)\in\mathbb{Z}[a,T].
Proof.

The denominators of a CC entry divide dNdend_{N_{\mathrm{den}}}. An off-diagonal BB entry is a difference of harmonic sums divided by j−ij-i, so its denominator divides dNden2d_{N_{\mathrm{den}}}^{2}, and so does that of bib_{i}. The entries T⁢aiTa^{i} are integral. The denominators of a VV entry divide dUd_{U}. ∎

3.1. Residue classes

For ρ>0\rho>0 and 0≤x<ρ0\leq x<\rho let

(3.2) K⁢(x,ρ)\displaystyle K(x,\rho) ={k≥0:1/2≤x+k⁢ρ<3/2},\displaystyle=\{k\geq 0:1/2\leq x+k\rho<3/2\},
ℒ⁢(x,ρ)\displaystyle\mathcal{L}(x,\rho) ={l≥0:1/4≤x+l⁢ρ<5/2},\displaystyle=\{l\geq 0:1/4\leq x+l\rho<5/2\},
W⁢(x,ρ)\displaystyle W(x,\rho) ={w≥1:0<w⁢ρ−x≤1/4},\displaystyle=\{w\geq 1:0<w\rho-x\leq 1/4\},

and

(3.3) 𝔯⁢(x,ρ)=min⁡(2⁢|K|+|W|,|ℒ|)−𝟏{K={0},ℒ={0,1},W=∅},𝔠⁢(ρ)=1+∫0ρ𝔯⁢(x,ρ)⁢𝑑x.\mathfrak{r}(x,\rho)=\min(2|K|+|W|,|\mathcal{L}|)-\mathbf{1}_{\{K=\{0\},\,% \mathcal{L}=\{0,1\},\,W=\varnothing\}},\qquad\mathfrak{c}(\rho)=1+\int_{0}^{% \rho}\mathfrak{r}(x,\rho)\,dx.
Lemma 3.2.

Let pp be a prime with p2>Up^{2}>U, so that p≥5p\geq 5, and let a=3a=3. Then

(3.4) vp⁢(Gm)≥−m−∑u=0p−1𝔯⁢(u/m,p/m)=−m⁢𝔠⁢(p/m).v_{p}(G_{m})\geq-m-\sum_{u=0}^{p-1}\mathfrak{r}(u/m,p/m)=-m\mathfrak{c}(p/m).
Proof.

Multiply the whole rows of CC, B−T⁢AB-TA and VV by pp, p2p^{2} and pp. The resulting matrix Sp⁢(T)S_{p}(T) has detSp⁢(T)=p3⁢m+n⁢Gm⁢(T)\det S_{p}(T)=p^{3m+n}G_{m}(T) and entries in ℤ(p)⁢[T]\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}[T], and Sp⁢(T)≡Sp⁢(0)(modp)S_{p}(T)\equiv S_{p}(0)\pmod{p} because p2⁢T⁢A≡0p^{2}TA\equiv 0. Write i=u+k⁢pi=u+kp, j=u+l⁢pj=u+lp with 0≤u<p0\leq u<p. Only the harmonic terms with pp in the denominator survive modulo pp. Their quotients are pp-units because all indices are less than p2p^{2}, and ap≡a(modp)a^{p}\equiv a\pmod{p}, so

p⁢tu+k⁢p≡au⁢tk,p2⁢bu+k⁢p≡au⁢bk(modp).pt_{u+kp}\equiv a^{u}t_{k},\qquad p^{2}b_{u+kp}\equiv a^{u}b_{k}\pmod{p}.

The scaled CC and BB entries vanish modulo pp between distinct residue classes modulo pp. For a cross-class BB entry, the numerator is pp-integral after the row scaling and the remaining factor p/(j−i)p/(j-i) is zero modulo pp. Within a class, for j≠ij\neq i, j−i=p⁢(l−k)j-i=p(l-k) with 0<|l−k|<p0<|l-k|<p, so the quotient denominator is a unit. Diagonal entries are given by the separate cases i=ji=j in the definitions of CC and BB. Since au+k⁢p≡au+k(modp)a^{u+kp}\equiv a^{u+k}\pmod{p}, for i≠ji\neq j

p⁢Ci⁢j=ai−ajl−k≡au⁢ak−all−k=au⁢Ck⁢l,p2⁢Bi⁢j=p⁢ti−p⁢tjl−k≡au⁢Bk⁢l(modp).pC_{ij}=\frac{a^{i}-a^{j}}{l-k}\equiv a^{u}\frac{a^{k}-a^{l}}{l-k}=a^{u}C_{kl}% ,\qquad p^{2}B_{ij}=\frac{pt_{i}-pt_{j}}{l-k}\equiv a^{u}B_{kl}\pmod{p}.

A VV row reduces to zero unless ℓ+u=p⁢w\ell+u=pw. Then its entry is 1/(l+w)1/(l+w), without the factor aua^{u}, and l+w=(j+ℓ)/p<pl+w=(j+\ell)/p<p. So, after permutations, the reduction has blocks with 2⁢|K|+|W|2|K|+|W| rows and |ℒ||\mathcal{L}| columns, where (x,ρ)=(u/m,p/m)(x,\rho)=(u/m,p/m).

For K={0}K=\{0\}, ℒ={0,1}\mathcal{L}=\{0,1\}, W=∅W=\varnothing the block, with its rows divided by the unit aua^{u}, is

(3.5) (01−a0−1)=(0−20−1),\begin{pmatrix}0&1-a\\ 0&-1\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}0&-2\\ 0&-1\end{pmatrix},

of rank one for every pp. Every other block has rank at most the minimum of its dimensions. So the rank of Sp⁢(0)S_{p}(0) modulo pp is at most rkp=∑u𝔯⁢(u/m,p/m)\mathrm{rk}_{p}=\sum_{u}\mathfrak{r}(u/m,p/m). The matrix has 2⁢m+n2m+n rows. Row operations over ℤ(p)\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}, independent of TT, make its last 2⁢m+n−rkp2m+n-\mathrm{rk}_{p} rows divisible by pp coefficientwise. Subtracting the scaling exponent 3⁢m+n3m+n gives the first inequality in (3.4).

Every boundary in (3.2) has the form x=c0+b⁢ρx=c_{0}+b\rho with 4⁢c0,b∈ℤ4c_{0},b\in\mathbb{Z}. At ρ=p/m\rho=p/m, m=4⁢nm=4n, it lies in m−1⁢ℤm^{-1}\mathbb{Z}. The K,ℒK,\mathcal{L} conditions are closed on the left and open on the right in xx, and the WW condition is w⁢ρ−1/4≤x<w⁢ρw\rho-1/4\leq x<w\rho. So 𝔯\mathfrak{r} is constant on each [u/m,(u+1)/m)[u/m,(u+1)/m), and

(3.6) ∑u=0p−1𝔯⁢(u/m,p/m)=m⁢∫0p/m𝔯⁢(x,p/m)⁢𝑑x.∎\sum_{u=0}^{p-1}\mathfrak{r}(u/m,p/m)=m\int_{0}^{p/m}\mathfrak{r}(x,p/m)\,dx.\qed

The lines that bound the sets (3.2) are x=z0−k⁢ρx=z_{0}-k\rho (z0∈{1/4,1/2,3/2,5/2},k≥0)(z_{0}\in\{1/4,1/2,3/2,5/2\},\ k\geq 0) and x=w⁢ρ−1/4x=w\rho-1/4 (w≥1)(w\geq 1). The first meets the strip 0<x<ρ0<x<\rho exactly for z0/(k+1)<ρ<z0/kz_{0}/(k+1)<\rho<z_{0}/k, the second exactly for 1/(4⁢w)<ρ<1/(4⁢(w−1))1/(4w)<\rho<1/(4(w-1)). For k=0k=0 and for w=1w=1 the upper endpoint is +∞+\infty. So x=z0−k⁢ρx=z_{0}-k\rho meets the strip for some ρ∈(1/R,5/4)\rho\in(1/R,5/4) if and only if 4⁢z0/5−1<k<z0⁢R4z_{0}/5-1<k<z_{0}R, and x=w⁢ρ−1/4x=w\rho-1/4 if and only if 1≤w<R/4+11\leq w<R/4+1. Hence, for 1/R<ρ<5/41/R<\rho<5/4, the sets (3.2) change only on the 3939 lines

(3.7) x=0,x=ρ,x=w⁢ρ−1/4(1≤w≤2),x=1/4−k⁢ρ(0≤k≤1),x=1/2−k⁢ρ(0≤k≤3),x=3/2−k⁢ρ(1≤k≤11),x=5/2−k⁢ρ(2≤k≤19).\begin{gathered}x=0,\quad x=\rho,\quad x=w\rho-1/4\quad(1\leq w\leq 2),\\ x=1/4-k\rho\quad(0\leq k\leq 1),\quad x=1/2-k\rho\quad(0\leq k\leq 3),\\ x=3/2-k\rho\quad(1\leq k\leq 11),\quad x=5/2-k\rho\quad(2\leq k\leq 19).\end{gathered}

Cut (1/R,5/4)(1/R,5/4) at the finitely many values of ρ\rho where two of these lines meet in 0≤x≤ρ0\leq x\leq\rho, and let 𝒞\mathcal{C} be the set of these cut points. For ρ∈(1/R,5/4)∖𝒞\rho\in(1/R,5/4)\setminus\mathcal{C} and each z0z_{0} exactly one line x=z0−k⁢ρx=z_{0}-k\rho meets 0<x<ρ0<x<\rho, namely k=⌊z0/ρ⌋k=\lfloor z_{0}/\rho\rfloor, and exactly one line x=w⁢ρ−1/4x=w\rho-1/4 does, namely w=⌊1/(4⁢ρ)⌋+1w=\lfloor 1/(4\rho)\rfloor+1. These indices lie in the ranges of (3.7). So on each open interval of (1/R,5/4)∖𝒞(1/R,5/4)\setminus\mathcal{C} the order of the lines in 0<x<ρ0<x<\rho is fixed, exactly five lines lie there, the sets (3.2) are constant on each of the six xx-intervals between consecutive lines, and 𝔠\mathfrak{c} is affine. A change of ρ\rho by δ\delta moves each of these lines by O⁢(|δ|)O(|\delta|) and the endpoint of the integral by δ\delta. So the sets (3.2) change only on strips of total length O⁢(|δ|)O(|\delta|). As 𝔯\mathfrak{r} is bounded, |𝔠⁢(ρ)−𝔠⁢(ρ′)|=O⁢(|ρ−ρ′|)|\mathfrak{c}(\rho)-\mathfrak{c}(\rho^{\prime})|=O(|\rho-\rho^{\prime}|), and 𝔠\mathfrak{c} is continuous. Table A.2 (Appendix A) lists 7676 consecutive intervals with union (1/R,5/4)(1/R,5/4) up to finitely many points, and the affine function 𝔠\mathfrak{c} on each. Each row follows from (3.2)–(3.3) and (3.7). The affine functions of adjacent rows agree at all 7575 internal joins. Summation of the rows gives

(3.8) ∫1/R5/4𝔠⁢(ρ)⁢𝑑ρ=580566971177365760.\int_{1/R}^{5/4}\mathfrak{c}(\rho)\,d\rho=\frac{580566971}{177365760}.

The configuration K={0}K=\{0\}, ℒ={0,1}\mathcal{L}=\{0,1\}, W=∅W=\varnothing of (3.5) means max⁡(1/2,3/2−ρ)≤x<3/2\max(1/2,3/2-\rho)\leq x<3/2, max⁡(1/4,5/2−2⁢ρ)≤x<5/2−ρ\max(1/4,5/2-2\rho)\leq x<5/2-\rho and x<ρ−1/4x<\rho-1/4. For ρ<5/4\rho<5/4 this is max⁡(1/2,3/2−ρ,5/2−2⁢ρ)≤x<ρ−1/4\max(1/2,3/2-\rho,5/2-2\rho)\leq x<\rho-1/4, which is nonempty only for ρ>11/12\rho>11/12. So it occupies 5/2−2⁢ρ≤x<ρ−1/45/2-2\rho\leq x<\rho-1/4 for 11/12<ρ<111/12<\rho<1, and 1/2≤x<ρ−1/41/2\leq x<\rho-1/4 for 1≤ρ<5/41\leq\rho<5/4. As 1/R<11/121/R<11/12, its contribution to (3.8) is

−∫11/121(3⁢ρ−11/4)⁢𝑑ρ−∫15/4(ρ−3/4)⁢𝑑ρ=−548.-\int_{11/12}^{1}(3\rho-11/4)\,d\rho-\int_{1}^{5/4}(\rho-3/4)\,d\rho=-\frac{5}% {48}.

3.2. Larger primes

For p>5⁢np>5n define row potentials λC=0\lambda_{C}=0, λB⁢(i)\lambda_{B}(i), λV⁢(ℓ)\lambda_{V}(\ell) and column potentials χ⁢(j)\chi(j) by

5⁢n<p<6⁢n:\displaystyle 5n<p<6n: (λB,λV,χ)=(1+𝟏i≥p, 1, 1j≥p+2⁢n),\displaystyle\quad(\lambda_{B},\lambda_{V},\chi)=(1+\mathbf{1}_{i\geq p},\,1,% \,\mathbf{1}_{j\geq p+2n}),
6⁢n≤p<8⁢n:\displaystyle 6n\leq p<8n: (λB,λV,χ)=(𝟏i+p<10⁢n, 1, 1j≥p),\displaystyle\quad(\lambda_{B},\lambda_{V},\chi)=(\mathbf{1}_{i+p<10n},\,1,\,% \mathbf{1}_{j\geq p}),
8⁢n≤p<10⁢n:\displaystyle 8n\leq p<10n: (λB,λV,χ)=(0, 1, 1j≥p),\displaystyle\quad(\lambda_{B},\lambda_{V},\chi)=(0,\,1,\,\mathbf{1}_{j\geq p}),
10⁢n≤p≤11⁢n−1:\displaystyle 10n\leq p\leq 11n-1: (λB,λV,χ)=(0, 1p−ℓ∈J, 0),\displaystyle\quad(\lambda_{B},\lambda_{V},\chi)=(0,\,\mathbf{1}_{p-\ell\in J}% ,\,0),

and put

Epout={19⁢n−2⁢p,5⁢n<p<8⁢n,11⁢n−p,8⁢n≤p≤U.E_{p}^{\rm out}=\begin{cases}19n-2p,&5n<p<8n,\\ 11n-p,&8n\leq p\leq U.\end{cases}
Lemma 3.3.

For a prime 5⁢n<p≤U5n<p\leq U one has vp⁢(Gm)≥−Epoutv_{p}(G_{m})\geq-E_{p}^{\rm out}.

Proof.

A CC entry has a pole only at j=i+pj=i+p, of order at most one. A BB entry has pole order at most

𝟏max⁡(i,j)≥p+𝟏{max⁡(i,j)≥p,i≡j(modp)},\mathbf{1}_{\max(i,j)\geq p}+\mathbf{1}_{\{\max(i,j)\geq p,\ i\equiv j\pmod{p}% \}},

including the double pole of bib_{i} for i≥pi\geq p. A VV entry has a simple pole when p∣j+ℓp\mid j+\ell. As p2>Up^{2}>U, there are no higher powers.

In the first range every BB row has potential at least one, and two if i≥pi\geq p. A collision j=i+pj=i+p has j≥p+2⁢nj\geq p+2n, and its column gives the second unit. In the second range all i<pi<p. The columns j≥pj\geq p cover the simple BB poles and the CC poles. A collision needs i+p<10⁢ni+p<10n, and its row gives the other unit. In the third range i<pi<p and i+p≥10⁢ni+p\geq 10n, so only simple BB poles remain. In these three ranges every VV row has potential one, which covers j+ℓ=pj+\ell=p and j+ℓ=2⁢pj+\ell=2p. In the fourth range i,j<pi,j<p, only VV poles remain, and the rows with λV=1\lambda_{V}=1 are those containing one. So λrow+χj\lambda_{\rm row}+\chi_{j} dominates every pole order. Multiply each row and column by pp to the power of its potential. The potentials add up to (10⁢n−p)+n+(8⁢n−p)(10n-p)+n+(8n-p), (8⁢n−p)+n+(10⁢n−p)(8n-p)+n+(10n-p), n+(10⁢n−p)n+(10n-p) and 11⁢n−p11n-p in the four ranges. ∎

3.3. The factor at three

Lemma 3.4.

Let Nm=⌈53⁢m2/48⌉−mN_{m}=\lceil 53m^{2}/48\rceil-m. Then

(3.9) Pm⁢(a,T)∈aNm⁢ℤ⁢[a,T].P_{m}(a,T)\in a^{N_{m}}\mathbb{Z}[a,T].

In particular v3⁢(Gm)≥Nm−v3⁢(𝒟m)v_{3}(G_{m})\geq N_{m}-v_{3}(\mathcal{D}_{m}).

Proof.

Work in ℚ⁢[[a]]⁢[T]\mathbb{Q}[[a]][T]. Write

Sj⁢(a)=∑u≥1auuj,𝗏k⁢(i)={(i−k)−1,i≠k,0,i=k,𝗓k⁢(i)=𝗏k⁢(i)2,𝖾k⁢(i)=𝟏i=k.S_{j}(a)=\sum_{u\geq 1}\frac{a^{u}}{u^{j}},\qquad\mathsf{v}_{k}(i)=\begin{% cases}(i-k)^{-1},&i\neq k,\\ 0,&i=k,\end{cases}\quad\mathsf{z}_{k}(i)=\mathsf{v}_{k}(i)^{2},\quad\mathsf{e}% _{k}(i)=\mathbf{1}_{i=k}.

Subtract S1⁢(a)S_{1}(a) times each CC row from the paired row of B−T⁢AB-TA. Comparison of coefficients, including the diagonal, gives

(3.10) (CB−T⁢A−S1⁢C)\displaystyle\begin{pmatrix}C\\ B-TA-S_{1}C\end{pmatrix} =∑k≥0ak⁢(𝗏k⁢(I)−𝗓k⁢(I)−(T+S2)⁢𝖾k⁢(I))⁢𝖾k⁢(J)t\displaystyle=\sum_{k\geq 0}a^{k}\begin{pmatrix}\mathsf{v}_{k}(I)\\ -\mathsf{z}_{k}(I)-(T+S_{2})\mathsf{e}_{k}(I)\end{pmatrix}\mathsf{e}_{k}(J)^{t}
+∑k≥0ak⁢(𝖾k⁢(I)𝗏k⁢(I))⁢𝗏k⁢(J)t+∑k≥0ak⁢(0−𝖾k⁢(I))⁢𝗓k⁢(J)t.\displaystyle\quad+\sum_{k\geq 0}a^{k}\begin{pmatrix}\mathsf{e}_{k}(I)\\ \mathsf{v}_{k}(I)\end{pmatrix}\mathsf{v}_{k}(J)^{t}+\sum_{k\geq 0}a^{k}\begin{% pmatrix}0\\ -\mathsf{e}_{k}(I)\end{pmatrix}\mathsf{z}_{k}(J)^{t}.

For example, the off-diagonal lower entry is ∑k≥0ak⁢𝗏k⁢(i)⁢𝗏k⁢(j)−(ai+aj)/(i−j)2\sum_{k\geq 0}a^{k}\mathsf{v}_{k}(i)\mathsf{v}_{k}(j)-(a^{i}+a^{j})/(i-j)^{2}, and the diagonal entry is ∑k≥0ak⁢𝗏k⁢(i)2−ai⁢(T+S2)=bi−T⁢ai\sum_{k\geq 0}a^{k}\mathsf{v}_{k}(i)^{2}-a^{i}(T+S_{2})=b_{i}-Ta^{i}. Each coefficient of aa involves finitely many terms.

Expand along the nn rows of VV, and expand each remaining 2⁢m2m-row minor by the rank-one summands in (3.10). A nonzero term selects 2⁢m=8⁢n2m=8n distinct rank-one summands. At weight kk at most

ck=1+𝟏k∈J+𝟏k∈Ic_{k}=1+\mathbf{1}_{k\in J}+\mathbf{1}_{k\in I}

occur: the first summand needs k∈Jk\in J, the third needs k∈Ik\in I. All entries, including T+S2T+S_{2}, have nonnegative order in aa. So every term has order at least the sum of the 8⁢n8n smallest available weights. The infinite expansion is used coefficientwise. Modulo aNm+1a^{N_{m}+1} only finitely many kk occur, so Cauchy–Binet applies to a finite truncation.

There is one weight at each 0≤k<n0\leq k<n, two at each n≤k<2⁢nn\leq k<2n, and three at each 2⁢n≤k<6⁢n2n\leq k<6n. Write 5⁢n=3⁢d+ϵ′5n=3d+\epsilon^{\prime}, 0≤ϵ′<30\leq\epsilon^{\prime}<3. The minimum available-weight sum is

∑k=0n−1k+2⁢∑k=n2⁢n−1k+3⁢∑k=2⁢n2⁢n+d−1k+ϵ′⁢(2⁢n+d)\displaystyle\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}k+2\sum_{k=n}^{2n-1}k+3\sum_{k=2n}^{2n+d-1}k+% \epsilon^{\prime}(2n+d) =53⁢n23−4⁢n+ϵ′⁢(3−ϵ′)6\displaystyle=\frac{53n^{2}}{3}-4n+\frac{\epsilon^{\prime}(3-\epsilon^{\prime}% )}{6}
=⌈53⁢n23⌉−4⁢n=Nm.\displaystyle=\left\lceil\frac{53n^{2}}{3}\right\rceil-4n=N_{m}.

The minors of VV do not depend on a,Ta,T, so aNm∣Gm⁢(T;a)a^{N_{m}}\mid G_{m}(T;a) in ℚ⁢[a,T]\mathbb{Q}[a,T]. By (3.1), division by the monic aNma^{N_{m}} gives (3.9). Specialization at a=3a=3 gives the last statement. ∎

3.4. Summation over primes

Put e0⁢(p)=3⁢m⁢⌊logp⁡Nden⌋+n⁢⌊logp⁡U⌋=vp⁢(𝒟m)e_{0}(p)=3m\lfloor\log_{p}N_{\mathrm{den}}\rfloor+n\lfloor\log_{p}U\rfloor=v_{% p}(\mathcal{D}_{m}). With the first applicable line taking precedence, let

(3.11) Ep={e0⁢(3)−Nm,p=3,e0⁢(p),p≤m/R⁢or⁢p2≤U⁢or⁢p=5⁢m/4,m⁢𝔠⁢(p/m),m/R<p<5⁢m/4,Epout,5⁢m/4<p≤U,0,p>U,Km=∏ppEp∈ℚ>0.E_{p}=\begin{cases}e_{0}(3)-N_{m},&p=3,\\ e_{0}(p),&p\leq m/R\ \text{or}\ p^{2}\leq U\ \text{or}\ p=5m/4,\\ m\mathfrak{c}(p/m),&m/R<p<5m/4,\\ E_{p}^{\rm out},&5m/4<p\leq U,\\ 0,&p>U,\end{cases}\qquad K_{m}=\prod_{p}p^{E_{p}}\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0}.
Lemma 3.5.

One has Km⁢Gm⁢(T)∈ℤ⁢[T]K_{m}G_{m}(T)\in\mathbb{Z}[T] for every m=4⁢nm=4n, and log⁡Km≤τ⁢m2+o⁢(m2)\log K_{m}\leq\tau m^{2}+o(m^{2}) as m→∞m\to\infty, where

(3.12) A=134⁢R+∫1/R5/4𝔠⁢(ρ)⁢𝑑ρ+4532=902042411177365760,τ=A−5348⁢log⁡3=3.872724286099666640⁢…,\begin{gathered}A=\frac{13}{4R}+\int_{1/R}^{5/4}\mathfrak{c}(\rho)\,d\rho+% \frac{45}{32}=\frac{902042411}{177365760},\\ \tau=A-\frac{53}{48}\log 3=3.872724286099666640\ldots,\end{gathered}

so that α0−τ>0.00305\alpha_{0}-\tau>0.00305 for the constant α0\alpha_{0} defined after (4.5) in Section 4.

Proof.

By (3.6), m⁢𝔠⁢(p/m)∈ℤm\mathfrak{c}(p/m)\in\mathbb{Z}. Lemmas 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 give vp⁢(Km⁢Gm)≥0v_{p}(K_{m}G_{m})\geq 0 for every pp. The exponent at three may be negative. Since 𝔯≤|ℒ|\mathfrak{r}\leq|\mathcal{L}| and ∑u|ℒ⁢(u/m,p/m)|=|J|=9⁢n\sum_{u}|\mathcal{L}(u/m,p/m)|=|J|=9n, every inner exponent is at most 13⁢n13n.

If m≥11⁢R2/4m\geq 11R^{2}/4, then p>m/Rp>m/R implies p2>m2/R2≥11⁢m/4>Up^{2}>m^{2}/R^{2}\geq 11m/4>U. Put

ηPNT⁢(X)=supy≥X|θCh⁢(y)/y−1|.\eta_{\rm PNT}(X)=\sup_{y\geq X}|\theta_{\rm Ch}(y)/y-1|.

By Fact 1, ηPNT⁢(X)→0\eta_{\rm PNT}(X)\to 0. For an affine ff on [t0,t1]⊂[1/R,11/4][t_{0},t_{1}]\subset[1/R,11/4], Stieltjes integration by parts gives

m⁢∑t0⁢m<p<t1⁢mf⁢(p/m)⁢log⁡p=m2⁢∫t0t1f⁢(ρ)⁢𝑑ρ+Of⁢(ηPNT⁢(m/R)⁢m2+m⁢log⁡m).m\sum_{t_{0}m<p<t_{1}m}f(p/m)\log p=m^{2}\int_{t_{0}}^{t_{1}}f(\rho)\,d\rho+O_% {f}\bigl{(}\eta_{\rm PNT}(m/R)m^{2}+m\log m\bigr{)}.

There are finitely many pieces, and the primes at the finitely many points of 𝒞∪{1/R,5/4,2,11/4}\mathcal{C}\cup\{1/R,5/4,2,11/4\}, at most one for each point and each mm, contribute O⁢(m⁢log⁡m)O(m\log m). For p≤m/Rp\leq m/R the first powers contribute (13⁢m/4)⁢θCh⁢(m/R)=134⁢R⁢m2+o⁢(m2)(13m/4)\theta_{\rm Ch}(m/R)=\frac{13}{4R}m^{2}+o(m^{2}), and the higher powers, including those of two and three,

O⁢(m⁢∑j=2⌊log2⁡U⌋θCh⁢(U1/j))=O⁢(m3/2⁢log⁡(3⁢m)).O\Bigl{(}m\sum_{j=2}^{\lfloor\log_{2}U\rfloor}\theta_{\rm Ch}(U^{1/j})\Bigr{)}% =O(m^{3/2}\log(3m)).

Subtract Nm⁢log⁡3N_{m}\log 3 once. For p>5⁢m/4p>5m/4 the exponent is m⁢𝔠out⁢(p/m)m\mathfrak{c}_{\rm out}(p/m) with

𝔠out⁢(ρ)={19/4−2⁢ρ,5/4<ρ<2,11/4−ρ,2≤ρ≤11/4,∫5/411/4𝔠out⁢(ρ)⁢𝑑ρ=98+932=4532.\mathfrak{c}_{\rm out}(\rho)=\begin{cases}19/4-2\rho,&5/4<\rho<2,\\ 11/4-\rho,&2\leq\rho\leq 11/4,\end{cases}\qquad\int_{5/4}^{11/4}\mathfrak{c}_{% \rm out}(\rho)\,d\rho=\frac{9}{8}+\frac{9}{32}=\frac{45}{32}.

With (3.8) this gives A−5348⁢log⁡3=τA-\frac{53}{48}\log 3=\tau. The total error is O⁢(ηPNT⁢(m/R)⁢m2+m3/2⁢log⁡(3⁢m))=o⁢(m2)O(\eta_{\rm PNT}(m/R)m^{2}+m^{3/2}\log(3m))=o(m^{2}). The bounds log⁡3>2⁢∑k=099((2⁢k+1)⁢22⁢k+1)−1\log 3>2\sum_{k=0}^{99}((2k+1)2^{2k+1})^{-1} and log⁡3<2⁢∑k=099((2⁢k+1)⁢22⁢k+1)−1+8/(3⋅201⋅2201)\log 3<2\sum_{k=0}^{99}((2k+1)2^{2k+1})^{-1}+8/(3\cdot 201\cdot 2^{201}) give the digits of τ\tau and of α0−τ\alpha_{0}-\tau. ∎

4. Analytic estimate

In (2.5) there are mm, L=5⁢m/4L=5m/4 and mm variables xx, vv, zz. Let

𝒦x=𝒦v=[0,1],𝒦z=[1,3]∪{z:|z|=r}.\mathcal{K}_{x}=\mathcal{K}_{v}=[0,1],\qquad\mathcal{K}_{z}=[1,3]\cup\{z:|z|=r\}.

For finite positive measures put

I⁢(σ,σ′)\displaystyle I(\sigma,\sigma^{\prime}) =∬log⁡|u−w|⁢d⁢σ⁢(u)⁢𝑑σ′⁢(w),D⁢(σ,σ′)=∬log⁡|3−u⁢w|⁢d⁢σ⁢(u)⁢𝑑σ′⁢(w),\displaystyle=\iint\log|u-w|\,d\sigma(u)\,d\sigma^{\prime}(w),\qquad D(\sigma,% \sigma^{\prime})=\iint\log|3-uw|\,d\sigma(u)\,d\sigma^{\prime}(w),
𝒬⁢(μ)\displaystyle\mathcal{Q}(\mu) =I⁢(μx,μx)+I⁢(μv,μv)+I⁢(μz,μz)+I⁢(μv,μz)−D⁢(μx,μv).\displaystyle=I(\mu_{x},\mu_{x})+I(\mu_{v},\mu_{v})+I(\mu_{z},\mu_{z})+I(\mu_{% v},\mu_{z})-D(\mu_{x},\mu_{v}).

For a fixed ν=(νx,νv,νz)\nu=(\nu_{x},\nu_{v},\nu_{z}) let 𝒰i⁢(q)=∫log⁡|q−t|⁢d⁢νi⁢(t)\mathcal{U}_{i}(q)=\int\log|q-t|\,d\nu_{i}(t), Di⁢(q)=∫log⁡|3−q⁢t|⁢d⁢νi⁢(t)D_{i}(q)=\int\log|3-qt|\,d\nu_{i}(t) (i=x,v)(i=x,v),

ψx\displaystyle\psi_{x} =2⁢𝒰x−Dv,ψv=2⁢𝒰v+𝒰z−Dx,ψz=2⁢𝒰z+𝒰v,\displaystyle=2\mathcal{U}_{x}-D_{v},\qquad\psi_{v}=2\mathcal{U}_{v}+\mathcal{% U}_{z}-D_{x},\qquad\psi_{z}=2\mathcal{U}_{z}+\mathcal{U}_{v},
Fx⁢(q)\displaystyle F_{x}(q) =ψx⁢(q)+34⁢log⁡q,Fv⁢(q)=ψv⁢(q)+14⁢log⁡q(0<q≤1),\displaystyle=\psi_{x}(q)+\tfrac{3}{4}\log q,\quad F_{v}(q)=\psi_{v}(q)+\tfrac% {1}{4}\log q\quad(0<q\leq 1),
Fz⁢(q)\displaystyle F_{z}(q) =ψz⁢(q)−54⁢log⁡|q|(q∈𝒦z).\displaystyle=\psi_{z}(q)-\tfrac{5}{4}\log|q|\quad(q\in\mathcal{K}_{z}).

For a compact line segment or circle Γ⊂ℂ\Gamma\subset\mathbb{C} let ℓΓ\ell_{\Gamma} be arclength on Γ\Gamma. A segment meets the open disk B⁢(q,t)={w:|w−q|<t}B(q,t)=\{w:|w-q|<t\} in length at most 2⁢t2t. A circle meets it in arclength at most 2⁢π⁢t2\pi t. If tt is at least the radius, this follows from the length of the circle. Otherwise the intersection is an arc of at most a semicircle, of length at most π/2\pi/2 times its chord. So ℓΓ⁢(B⁢(q,t))≤2⁢π⁢t\ell_{\Gamma}(B(q,t))\leq 2\pi t for all q∈ℂq\in\mathbb{C}, t>0t>0. A positive measure η\eta is tame if η≤H⁢(ℓΓ1+⋯+ℓΓN)\eta\leq H(\ell_{\Gamma_{1}}+\dots+\ell_{\Gamma_{N}}) for some H≥0H\geq 0 and compact segments or circles Γ1,…,ΓN\Gamma_{1},\ldots,\Gamma_{N}, that is, if η\eta is a finite sum of measures with arclength density at most HH on finitely many segments and circles. Tame measures are finite and compactly supported, and sums of tame measures are tame. Let 𝔐\mathfrak{M} be the set of triples μ=(μx,μv,μz)\mu=(\mu_{x},\mu_{v},\mu_{z}) of tame measures of masses (1,5/4,1)(1,5/4,1) with supp⁡μx⊆{|q|≤19/16}\operatorname{supp}\mu_{x}\subseteq\{|q|\leq 19/16\} and supp⁡μv⊆{ζ≤|q|≤19/16}\operatorname{supp}\mu_{v}\subseteq\{\zeta\leq|q|\leq 19/16\} for some ζ>0\zeta>0. On these supports |3−u⁢w|≥3−(19/16)2>1|3-uw|\geq 3-(19/16)^{2}>1.

Lemma 4.1.

For μ,ν∈𝔐\mu,\nu\in\mathfrak{M}, with ψx,ψv,ψz\psi_{x},\psi_{v},\psi_{z} formed from ν\nu,

(4.1) 𝒬⁢(μ)≤−𝒬⁢(ν)+∫ψx⁢𝑑μx+∫ψv⁢𝑑μv+∫ψz⁢𝑑μz.\mathcal{Q}(\mu)\leq-\mathcal{Q}(\nu)+\int\psi_{x}\,d\mu_{x}+\int\psi_{v}\,d% \mu_{v}+\int\psi_{z}\,d\mu_{z}.
Proof.

We first show that for tame η,η′\eta,\eta^{\prime}

∬|log⁡|u−w||⁢𝑑η⁢(u)⁢𝑑η′⁢(w)<∞.\iint|\log|u-w||\,d\eta(u)\,d\eta^{\prime}(w)<\infty.

By the definition of tame it suffices to take η=ℓΓ\eta=\ell_{\Gamma}, η′=ℓΓ′\eta^{\prime}=\ell_{\Gamma^{\prime}}. Let Λ≥1\Lambda\geq 1 bound |u−w||u-w| on Γ×Γ′\Gamma\times\Gamma^{\prime}. For u∈Γu\in\Gamma the layer-cake formula and the bound on ℓΓ′⁢(B⁢(u,t))\ell_{\Gamma^{\prime}}(B(u,t)) give

∫|log⁡|u−w||⁢𝑑ℓΓ′⁢(w)≤∫0∞ℓΓ′⁢(B⁢(u,e−s))⁢𝑑s+ℓΓ′⁢(ℂ)⁢log⁡Λ≤2⁢π+ℓΓ′⁢(ℂ)⁢log⁡Λ,\int|\log|u-w||\,d\ell_{\Gamma^{\prime}}(w)\leq\int_{0}^{\infty}\ell_{\Gamma^{% \prime}}(B(u,e^{-s}))\,ds+\ell_{\Gamma^{\prime}}(\mathbb{C})\log\Lambda\leq 2% \pi+\ell_{\Gamma^{\prime}}(\mathbb{C})\log\Lambda,

and integration over uu gives the bound.

Let VV be the space of real signed measures η−η′\eta-\eta^{\prime} with η,η′\eta,\eta^{\prime} tame and η⁢(ℂ)=η′⁢(ℂ)\eta(\mathbb{C})=\eta^{\prime}(\mathbb{C}). By this bound II is finite on V×VV\times V and on pairs of tame measures, so all pairings below are finite. For σ=η−η′∈V\sigma=\eta-\eta^{\prime}\in V one has |σ|≤η+η′|\sigma|\leq\eta+\eta^{\prime}, and Fact 2 gives

‖σ‖2=−I⁢(σ,σ)≥0.\|\sigma\|^{2}=-I(\sigma,\sigma)\geq 0.

So −I-I is a positive semidefinite symmetric form on VV, and |I⁢(σ,σ′)|≤‖σ‖⁢‖σ′‖|I(\sigma,\sigma^{\prime})|\leq\|\sigma\|\,\|\sigma^{\prime}\|.

Put σi=μi−νi∈V\sigma_{i}=\mu_{i}-\nu_{i}\in V, ι⁢(v)=3/v\iota(v)=3/v and β=ι∗⁢σv\beta=\iota_{*}\sigma_{v}. The vv-parts are supported in A={ζ≤|q|≤19/16}A=\{\zeta\leq|q|\leq 19/16\} (the smaller ζ\zeta). The map ι\iota sends Γ∖{0}\Gamma\setminus\{0\} into a line or circle and AA into {|q|≤3/ζ}\{|q|\leq 3/\zeta\}, and |ι′⁢(v)|=3/|v|2>1|\iota^{\prime}(v)|=3/|v|^{2}>1 on AA. So ι∗⁢(ℓΓ|A)≤ℓΓ′\iota_{*}(\ell_{\Gamma}|_{A})\leq\ell_{\Gamma^{\prime}} for a compact segment or circle Γ′\Gamma^{\prime}. Hence ι∗⁢μv\iota_{*}\mu_{v} and ι∗⁢νv\iota_{*}\nu_{v} are tame, β∈V\beta\in V, and log⁡|v|\log|v| is bounded on AA. From

log⁡|ι⁢(v)−ι⁢(w)|\displaystyle\log|\iota(v)-\iota(w)| =log⁡3+log⁡|v−w|−log⁡|v|−log⁡|w|,\displaystyle=\log 3+\log|v-w|-\log|v|-\log|w|,
log⁡|3−x⁢v|\displaystyle\log|3-xv| =log⁡|x−ι⁢(v)|+log⁡|v|,\displaystyle=\log|x-\iota(v)|+\log|v|,

and the zero masses,

I⁢(β,β)=I⁢(σv,σv),D⁢(σx,σv)=I⁢(σx,β).I(\beta,\beta)=I(\sigma_{v},\sigma_{v}),\qquad D(\sigma_{x},\sigma_{v})=I(% \sigma_{x},\beta).

With sx=‖σx‖s_{x}=\|\sigma_{x}\|, sv=‖σv‖=‖β‖s_{v}=\|\sigma_{v}\|=\|\beta\| and sz=‖σz‖s_{z}=\|\sigma_{z}\|,

𝒬⁢(σ)\displaystyle\mathcal{Q}(\sigma) =−sx2−sv2−sz2+I⁢(σv,σz)−I⁢(σx,β)≤−sx2−sv2−sz2+sv⁢sz+sx⁢sv\displaystyle=-s_{x}^{2}-s_{v}^{2}-s_{z}^{2}+I(\sigma_{v},\sigma_{z})-I(\sigma% _{x},\beta)\leq-s_{x}^{2}-s_{v}^{2}-s_{z}^{2}+s_{v}s_{z}+s_{x}s_{v}
=−(sx−sv/2)2−(sz−sv/2)2−sv2/2≤0.\displaystyle=-(s_{x}-s_{v}/2)^{2}-(s_{z}-s_{v}/2)^{2}-s_{v}^{2}/2\leq 0.

Let 𝒬⁢(⋅,⋅)\mathcal{Q}(\cdot,\cdot) be the symmetric bilinear form with 𝒬⁢(μ,μ)=𝒬⁢(μ)\mathcal{Q}(\mu,\mu)=\mathcal{Q}(\mu). Then 2⁢𝒬⁢(ν,μ)=∫ψx⁢𝑑μx+∫ψv⁢𝑑μv+∫ψz⁢𝑑μz2\mathcal{Q}(\nu,\mu)=\int\psi_{x}\,d\mu_{x}+\int\psi_{v}\,d\mu_{v}+\int\psi_{% z}\,d\mu_{z} and

𝒬⁢(μ)=𝒬⁢(ν)+2⁢𝒬⁢(ν,σ)+𝒬⁢(σ)≤2⁢𝒬⁢(ν,μ)−𝒬⁢(ν).∎\mathcal{Q}(\mu)=\mathcal{Q}(\nu)+2\mathcal{Q}(\nu,\sigma)+\mathcal{Q}(\sigma)% \leq 2\mathcal{Q}(\nu,\mu)-\mathcal{Q}(\nu).\qed
Lemma 4.2 (computer-assisted).

The measure ν\nu of Tables C.1 and C.2 lies in 𝔐\mathfrak{M}, supp⁡νi⊆𝒦i\operatorname{supp}\nu_{i}\subseteq\mathcal{K}_{i}, and

(4.2) 𝒬⁢(ν)≥q−:=−5.193572,\displaystyle\mathcal{Q}(\nu)\geq q_{-}:=-5.193572,
(4.3) Fx≤Kx:=−4.83148,Fv≤Kv:=−4.74318,Fz≤Kz:=0.04318\displaystyle F_{x}\leq K_{x}:=-4.83148,\qquad F_{v}\leq K_{v}:=-4.74318,% \qquad F_{z}\leq K_{z}:=0.04318

on (0,1](0,1], (0,1](0,1] and 𝒦z\mathcal{K}_{z}. On |z|=r|z|=r even Fz≤0.04283F_{z}\leq 0.04283.

Proof.

By Appendix C, νx\nu_{x}, νv\nu_{v} and the interval part νzint\nu_{z}^{\rm int} of νz\nu_{z} are sums of 131131, 143143 and 105105 intervals [t0,t1][t_{0},t_{1}] of positive mass ww, each carrying w⁢d⁢t/(t1−t0)w\,dt/(t_{1}-t_{0}). The intervals of each part form a chain of adjacent intervals, contained in [v0,1][v_{0},1] for νv\nu_{v}, v0=0.00960735979838v_{0}=0.00960735979838. The circular part νzPoi\nu_{z}^{\rm Poi} is a sum of 167167 Poisson measures (c,w)(c,w) with w>0w>0 and |c|<r|c|<r,

w⁢(r2−|c|2)2⁢π⁢|r⁢ei⁢ϑ−c|2⁢d⁢ϑ(0≤ϑ≤2⁢π).\frac{w(r^{2}-|c|^{2})}{2\pi|re^{i\vartheta}-c|^{2}}\,d\vartheta\qquad(0\leq% \vartheta\leq 2\pi).

Its arclength density is at most HcH_{c} in (4.7). The masses are 11, 5/45/4 and 11, and νz\nu_{z} is invariant under conjugation. Let Hx,Hv,HzH_{x},H_{v},H_{z} be the largest values of w/(t1−t0)w/(t_{1}-t_{0}) over the intervals of the three parts. So the parts of ν\nu are tame, supp⁡νv⊆[v0,1]\operatorname{supp}\nu_{v}\subseteq[v_{0},1], and ν∈𝔐\nu\in\mathfrak{M}. An interval has potential

wt1−t0⁢Re⁡{f⁢(q−t0)−f⁢(q−t1)},f⁢(u)=u⁢log⁡u−u,\frac{w}{t_{1}-t_{0}}\operatorname{Re}\{f(q-t_{0})-f(q-t_{1})\},\qquad f(u)=u% \log u-u,

with u⁢log⁡|u|−uu\log|u|-u on the real line and 0⁢log⁡0=00\log 0=0. A Poisson measure has potential

(4.4) w⁢{log⁡|r2−q⁢c¯|−log⁡r,|q|≤r,log⁡|q−c|,|q|≥r.w\begin{cases}\log|r^{2}-q\overline{c}|-\log r,&|q|\leq r,\\ \log|q-c|,&|q|\geq r.\end{cases}

Energy. Interval pairs use g⁢(u)=12⁢u2⁢log⁡|u|−34⁢u2g(u)=\tfrac{1}{2}u^{2}\log|u|-\tfrac{3}{4}u^{2}, with g′′⁢(u)=log⁡|u|g^{\prime\prime}(u)=\log|u|. A pair of Poisson measures (c,w)(c,w), (c′,w′)(c^{\prime},w^{\prime}) gives w⁢w′⁢(log⁡|r2−c⁢c′¯|−log⁡r)ww^{\prime}(\log|r^{2}-c\overline{c^{\prime}}|-\log r), by (4.4) and harmonicity. Interval–Poisson pairs integrate (4.4) with the primitives of log⁡|t−c|\log|t-c| and log⁡|r2−t⁢c¯|\log|r^{2}-t\overline{c}|, split at t=rt=r. For the denominator, with 𝖬ji=∫tj⁢𝑑νi\mathsf{M}_{j}^{i}=\int t^{j}\,d\nu_{i} and N=150N=150,

D⁢(νx,νv)=54⁢log⁡3−∑j=1N𝖬jx⁢𝖬jvj⁢3j−ℰN,0≤ℰN≤5/42⁢(N+1)⁢3N.D(\nu_{x},\nu_{v})=\frac{5}{4}\log 3-\sum_{j=1}^{N}\frac{\mathsf{M}_{j}^{x}% \mathsf{M}_{j}^{v}}{j3^{j}}-\mathcal{E}_{N},\qquad 0\leq\mathcal{E}_{N}\leq% \frac{5/4}{2(N+1)3^{N}}.

Table B.1 gives the outward enclosures, at 320320-bit precision. The enclosure of D⁢(νx,νv)D(\nu_{x},\nu_{v}) contains the partial sum minus [0,(5/4)/(2⁢(N+1)⁢3N)][0,(5/4)/(2(N+1)3^{N})]. The interval sum of the rows gives 𝒬⁢(ν)>q−+5⋅10−7\mathcal{Q}(\nu)>q_{-}+5\cdot 10^{-7}.

Small arguments. Put ε0=10−12\varepsilon_{0}=10^{-12}. For 0<q≤ε00<q\leq\varepsilon_{0}, 𝒰x⁢(q),𝒰v⁢(q)≤0\mathcal{U}_{x}(q),\mathcal{U}_{v}(q)\leq 0, 𝒰z⁢(q)≤log⁡(3+ε0)\mathcal{U}_{z}(q)\leq\log(3+\varepsilon_{0}), Dv⁢(q)≥54⁢log⁡(3−ε0)D_{v}(q)\geq\frac{5}{4}\log(3-\varepsilon_{0}) and Dx⁢(q)≥log⁡(3−ε0)D_{x}(q)\geq\log(3-\varepsilon_{0}). Hence

Fx⁢(q)\displaystyle F_{x}(q) ≤−54⁢log⁡(3−ε0)+34⁢log⁡ε0<−22.09,\displaystyle\leq-\tfrac{5}{4}\log(3-\varepsilon_{0})+\tfrac{3}{4}\log% \varepsilon_{0}<-22.09,
Fv⁢(q)\displaystyle F_{v}(q) ≤log⁡(3+ε0)−log⁡(3−ε0)+14⁢log⁡ε0<−6.90.\displaystyle\leq\log(3+\varepsilon_{0})-\log(3-\varepsilon_{0})+\tfrac{1}{4}% \log\varepsilon_{0}<-6.90.

Both are below the caps.

Subdivision. The bounds on [ε0,1][\varepsilon_{0},1], [ε0,1][\varepsilon_{0},1], [1,3][1,3] and the upper half of |z|=r|z|=r are proved on the 126464126464 closed pieces (leaves) of Lemma C.1. The lower half of the circle follows by conjugation. All bounds are computed in Arb ball arithmetic [6] at 192192-bit precision.

Let [l,u][l,u] be a leaf on a real support, with centre c0c_{0} and half-width h0h_{0}. The interval components of FF come from the chains of νx\nu_{x} on xx-leaves and of νv\nu_{v}, νzint\nu_{z}^{\rm int} on vv- and zz-leaves. The endpoints of the chains of νx\nu_{x}, νv\nu_{v}, νzint\nu_{z}^{\rm int} cut the initial pieces of the xx-, vv-, zz-support. The chain of νzint\nu_{z}^{\rm int} misses the vv-support, and that of νv\nu_{v} meets the zz-support only at 11. So the open leaf meets at most one interval [t0,t1][t_{0},t_{1}] of each of these chains, and then lies in it. A vv-leaf lies in [0,r][0,r] or in [r,1][r,1]. Write F=FC+FNF=F_{C}+F_{N}, where FCF_{C} is the sum of the interval components of FF, with their coefficient 22, whose interval contains [l,u][l,u]. Inside its interval a component is convex, since 𝒰′′=w/((q−t0)⁢(t1−q))>0\mathcal{U}^{\prime\prime}=w/((q-t_{0})(t_{1}-q))>0 there, so FCF_{C} lies below its chord on [l,u][l,u]. With B≥max⁡{0,sup(l,u)FN′′}B\geq\max\{0,\sup_{(l,u)}F_{N}^{\prime\prime}\}, Taylor’s formula with integral remainder for FNF_{N} at c0c_{0} gives

max[l,u]⁡F≤maxq∈{l,u}⁡(FC⁢(q)+FN⁢(c0)+FN′⁢(c0)⁢(q−c0))+12⁢h02⁢B,\max_{[l,u]}F\leq\max_{q\in\{l,u\}}\bigl{(}F_{C}(q)+F_{N}(c_{0})+F_{N}^{\prime% }(c_{0})(q-c_{0})\bigr{)}+\tfrac{1}{2}h_{0}^{2}B,

because the chord plus an affine function is affine. The other interval components have 𝒰′′=−w/((q−t0)⁢(q−t1))≤0\mathcal{U}^{\prime\prime}=-w/((q-t_{0})(q-t_{1}))\leq 0 on (l,u)(l,u). The terms 34⁢log⁡q\frac{3}{4}\log q and 14⁢log⁡q\frac{1}{4}\log q are concave, and (−54⁢log⁡q)′′≤54⁢l−2(-\frac{5}{4}\log q)^{\prime\prime}\leq\frac{5}{4}l^{-2} on [l,u][l,u]. The terms −Dv-D_{v}, −Dx-D_{x} are expanded as −M⁢log⁡3+∑j≥1𝖬j⁢qj/(j⁢3j)-M\log 3+\sum_{j\geq 1}\mathsf{M}_{j}q^{j}/(j3^{j}) with the first N′=90N^{\prime}=90 moments. The omitted value is at most M/(2⁢(N′+1)⁢3N′)M/(2(N^{\prime}+1)3^{N^{\prime}}), the omitted derivative lies in [0,M/(2⋅3N′)][0,M/(2\cdot 3^{N^{\prime}})], and the second derivative is at most M/4M/4. On the real line a Poisson measure has second derivative w⁢Re⁡(−c¯2/(r2−q⁢c¯)2)≤w⁢|c|2/|r2−q⁢c¯|2w\operatorname{Re}(-\overline{c}^{2}/(r^{2}-q\overline{c})^{2})\leq w|c|^{2}/|% r^{2}-q\overline{c}|^{2} for |q|≤r|q|\leq r and w⁢Re⁡(−(q−c)−2)≤w/|q−c|2w\operatorname{Re}(-(q-c)^{-2})\leq w/|q-c|^{2} for |q|≥r|q|\geq r; BB uses enclosures of these second derivatives over the leaf.

On an arc q=r⁢ei⁢ϑq=re^{i\vartheta}, |ϑ−ϑ0|≤h0|\vartheta-\vartheta_{0}|\leq h_{0}, of the circle we take the smaller of two bounds. The first is

F⁢(ϑ0)+h0⁢|F′⁢(ϑ0)|+12⁢h02⁢B,B≥max⁡{0,supF′′},F(\vartheta_{0})+h_{0}|F^{\prime}(\vartheta_{0})|+\tfrac{1}{2}h_{0}^{2}B,% \qquad B\geq\max\{0,\sup F^{\prime\prime}\},

with derivatives in ϑ\vartheta and

dd⁢ϑ⁢log⁡|q−s|=Re⁡i⁢qq−s,d2d⁢ϑ2⁢log⁡|q−s|=Re⁡q⁢s(q−s)2≤r⁢|s||q−s|2.\frac{d}{d\vartheta}\log|q-s|=\operatorname{Re}\frac{iq}{q-s},\qquad\frac{d^{2% }}{d\vartheta^{2}}\log|q-s|=\operatorname{Re}\frac{qs}{(q-s)^{2}}\leq\frac{r|s% |}{|q-s|^{2}}.

Here BB uses enclosures over the arc of these second derivatives for the Poisson terms (s=cs=c). For an interval component of mass ww and density HH on [t0,t1][t_{0},t_{1}] it uses the smaller upper end of two enclosures: of the exact second derivative H⁢Re⁡(q⁢log⁡q−t1q−t0+q2q−t1−q2q−t0)H\operatorname{Re}\bigl{(}q\log\frac{q-t_{1}}{q-t_{0}}+\frac{q^{2}}{q-t_{1}}-% \frac{q^{2}}{q-t_{0}}\bigr{)}, and of w⁢Re⁡(q⁢s/(q−s)2)w\operatorname{Re}(qs/(q-s)^{2}) with ss ranging over [t0,t1][t_{0},t_{1}]. The second bound uses that the distance from r⁢ei⁢ϑre^{i\vartheta} to a point s≥0s\geq 0 increases with ϑ∈[0,π]\vartheta\in[0,\pi]. It bounds the real-interval terms by their value at the right end of the arc and applies the first bound to the Poisson terms alone. On the arc starting at ϑ=0\vartheta=0 only the second bound is used.

On every leaf the upper end of the resulting bound is below the cap of its support in Table B.2: KxK_{x}, KvK_{v}, KzK_{z} on [1,3][1,3], and 0.04283<Kz0.04283<K_{z} on the circle. Table B.2 gives the largest upper end on each support. The least margin, attained on [1,3][1,3], is at least 2⋅10−62\cdot 10^{-6}. ∎

For this ν\nu put

(4.5) α=q−−32⁢log⁡3−Kx−54⁢Kv−Kz.\alpha=q_{-}-\tfrac{3}{2}\log 3-K_{x}-\tfrac{5}{4}K_{v}-K_{z}.

Since 32⁢log⁡3<1647919/106\frac{3}{2}\log 3<1647919/10^{6},

α>α0:=q−−1647919106−Kx−54⁢Kv−Kz=3.875784.\alpha>\alpha_{0}:=q_{-}-\frac{1647919}{10^{6}}-K_{x}-\frac{5}{4}K_{v}-K_{z}=3% .875784.
Lemma 4.3.

Let η\eta be a compactly supported positive measure of mass MM with η⁢(B⁢(q,t))≤A⁢t\eta(B(q,t))\leq At for all q∈ℂq\in\mathbb{C}, t>0t>0. If 0<d=|q−q′|≤1/30<d=|q-q^{\prime}|\leq 1/3, then

|∫log⁡|q−t|⁢d⁢η⁢(t)−∫log⁡|q′−t|⁢d⁢η⁢(t)|≤(6⁢A+2⁢M)⁢d⁢(1+log⁡(1/d)).\Bigl{|}\int\log|q-t|\,d\eta(t)-\int\log|q^{\prime}-t|\,d\eta(t)\Bigr{|}\leq(6% A+2M)\,d\,(1+\log(1/d)).

The components of the reference of Lemma 4.2 are compactly supported, and for them one may take

(4.6) Ax=2⁢Hx,Av=2⁢Hv,Az=2⁢Hz+∑cwc⁢(r+|c|)r⁢(r−|c|),A_{x}=2H_{x},\qquad A_{v}=2H_{v},\qquad A_{z}=2H_{z}+\sum_{c}\frac{w_{c}(r+|c|% )}{r(r-|c|)},

the sum over the 167167 Poisson measures (c,wc)(c,w_{c}). It is finite, since |c|<r|c|<r for every centre.

Proof.

The closed disk {w:|w−q|≤s}\{w:|w-q|\leq s\} is the intersection of the B⁢(q,s′)B(q,s^{\prime}), s′>ss^{\prime}>s, so its η\eta-measure is also at most A⁢sAs. Let N={t:|q−t|≤2⁢d}N=\{t:|q-t|\leq 2d\}. On NN both distances are at most 3⁢d≤13d\leq 1, and the layer-cake formula gives

∫Nlog⁡1|q−t|⁢d⁢η\displaystyle\int_{N}\log\frac{1}{|q-t|}\,d\eta ≤2⁢A⁢d⁢log⁡12⁢d+2⁢A⁢d,\displaystyle\leq 2Ad\log\frac{1}{2d}+2Ad,
∫Nlog⁡1|q′−t|⁢d⁢η\displaystyle\int_{N}\log\frac{1}{|q^{\prime}-t|}\,d\eta ≤2⁢A⁢d⁢log⁡13⁢d+3⁢A⁢d.\displaystyle\leq 2Ad\log\frac{1}{3d}+3Ad.

Off NN, |q′−t|≥|q−t|/2|q^{\prime}-t|\geq|q-t|/2, the logarithmic difference is at most 2⁢d/|q−t|2d/|q-t|, and

∫|q−t|>2⁢dd⁢η⁢(t)|q−t|≤∫01M⁢𝑑s+∫11/(2⁢d)As⁢𝑑s=M+A⁢log⁡12⁢d.\int_{|q-t|>2d}\frac{d\eta(t)}{|q-t|}\leq\int_{0}^{1}M\,ds+\int_{1}^{1/(2d)}% \frac{A}{s}\,ds=M+A\log\frac{1}{2d}.

The sum is at most 6⁢A⁢d⁢log⁡(1/d)+5⁢A⁢d+2⁢M⁢d6Ad\log(1/d)+5Ad+2Md.

By the bounds on ℓΓ⁢(B⁢(q,t))\ell_{\Gamma}(B(q,t)) before Lemma 4.1, an interval of density at most HiH_{i} gives 2⁢Hi2H_{i}, and a Poisson measure gives 2⁢π⁢Hc2\pi H_{c}: since |r⁢ei⁢ϑ−c|≥r−|c||re^{i\vartheta}-c|\geq r-|c| and arclength is r⁢d⁢ϑr\,d\vartheta, its arclength density is at most

(4.7) Hc=w⁢(r+|c|)2⁢π⁢r⁢(r−|c|).∎H_{c}=\frac{w(r+|c|)}{2\pi r(r-|c|)}.\qed

Put Mx=1M_{x}=1, Mv=5/4M_{v}=5/4, Mz=1M_{z}=1, and

(4.8) Bi=6⁢Ai+2⁢Mi,S=2⁢Bx+72⁢Bv+134⁢Bz,C=10+3⁢S.B_{i}=6A_{i}+2M_{i},\qquad S=2B_{x}+\tfrac{7}{2}B_{v}+\tfrac{13}{4}B_{z},% \qquad C=10+3S.

SS and CC are finite and depend only on ν\nu.

Lemma 4.4.

For every m=4⁢n≥4m=4n\geq 4,

(4.9) log⁡|Gm⁢(θ)|≤−α⁢m2+132⁢m⁢log⁡m+3⁢S⁢(1+log⁡(m2/3))+454+m⁢log⁡(Tr/3)−log⁡((m!)2⁢L!),\begin{split}\log|G_{m}(\theta)|\leq{}&-\alpha m^{2}+\tfrac{13}{2}m\log m+3S% \bigl{(}1+\log(m^{2}/3)\bigr{)}+\tfrac{45}{4}\\ &+m\log(T_{r}/3)-\log\bigl{(}(m!)^{2}L!\bigr{)},\end{split}

and hence log⁡|Gm⁢(θ)|≤−α0⁢m2+C⁢m⁢log⁡m\log|G_{m}(\theta)|\leq-\alpha_{0}m^{2}+Cm\log m with CC as in (4.8).

Proof.

Expand Γm\Gamma^{m} in (2.5) into products of its pieces and take absolute values. By (2.4) the paths contribute a factor at most TrmT_{r}^{m}, and [0,1]m×[0,1]L[0,1]^{m}\times[0,1]^{L} has volume one. So it suffices to bound log⁡|Φ|\log|\Phi| for x∈[0,1]mx\in[0,1]^{m}, v∈[0,1]Lv\in[0,1]^{L}, z∈𝒦zmz\in\mathcal{K}_{z}^{m}. If Φ=0\Phi=0 there is nothing to prove. Otherwise xi′,vb>0x_{i^{\prime}},v_{b}>0 and the points of each species are distinct. Let μx\mu_{x}, μv\mu_{v}, μz\mu_{z} put mass 1/m1/m at each xi′x_{i^{\prime}}, vbv_{b}, zdz_{d}. Since σ+k+h=3⁢m/4\sigma+k+h=3m/4, σ=m/4\sigma=m/4 and m+k=5⁢m/4m+k=5m/4,

(4.10) log⁡|Φ|m2=𝒬disc⁢(μ)+34⁢∫log⁡x⁢d⁢μx+14⁢∫log⁡v⁢d⁢μv−54⁢∫log⁡|z|⁢d⁢μz,\frac{\log|\Phi|}{m^{2}}=\mathcal{Q}_{\rm disc}(\mu)+\frac{3}{4}\int\log x\,d% \mu_{x}+\frac{1}{4}\int\log v\,d\mu_{v}-\frac{5}{4}\int\log|z|\,d\mu_{z},

where 𝒬disc\mathcal{Q}_{\rm disc} omits the diagonal in the three self-energies.

Put ϵ=m−2≤1/16\epsilon=m^{-2}\leq 1/16. Replace every atom qq by the uniform measure of mass 1/m1/m on the circle q+2⁢i⁢ϵ+ϵ⁢ei⁢ϑq+2i\epsilon+\epsilon e^{i\vartheta}, and let μϵ\mu^{\epsilon} be the result. Since 12⁢π⁢∫02⁢πlog⁡|u+ϵ⁢ei⁢ϑ|⁢d⁢ϑ=log⁡max⁡(|u|,ϵ)\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\log|u+\epsilon e^{i\vartheta}|\,d\vartheta=\log% \max(|u|,\epsilon) and the common translation cancels in differences, averaging does not decrease any off-diagonal positive pair. Each circle has energy log⁡ϵ\log\epsilon, and there are 13⁢m/413m/4 atoms. The function log⁡|3−X⁢V|\log|3-XV| is harmonic in each variable on the product of two smearing disks, since |X|,|V|≤1+3⁢ϵ≤19/16|X|,|V|\leq 1+3\epsilon\leq 19/16. Its mean is log⁡|3−(x+2⁢i⁢ϵ)⁢(v+2⁢i⁢ϵ)|≤log⁡(3−x⁢v)+3⁢ϵ\log|3-(x+2i\epsilon)(v+2i\epsilon)|\leq\log(3-xv)+3\epsilon, because |(x+2⁢i⁢ϵ)⁢(v+2⁢i⁢ϵ)−x⁢v|≤4⁢ϵ+4⁢ϵ2|(x+2i\epsilon)(v+2i\epsilon)-xv|\leq 4\epsilon+4\epsilon^{2} and 3−x⁢v≥23-xv\geq 2. With the masses 1⋅5/41\cdot 5/4,

(4.11) 𝒬disc⁢(μ)≤𝒬⁢(μϵ)+134⁢m⁢log⁡1ϵ+154⁢ϵ.\mathcal{Q}_{\rm disc}(\mu)\leq\mathcal{Q}(\mu^{\epsilon})+\frac{13}{4m}\log% \frac{1}{\epsilon}+\frac{15}{4}\epsilon.

The measures μϵ\mu^{\epsilon} and ν\nu lie in 𝔐\mathfrak{M}: μϵ\mu^{\epsilon} is a sum of uniform measures on circles, inside {|q|≤19/16}\{|q|\leq 19/16\} for xx and vv, with Im⁡q≥ϵ\operatorname{Im}q\geq\epsilon on the vv-circles. For ν\nu this is part of Lemma 4.2. By Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2,

𝒬⁢(μϵ)≤−q−+∑i∫ψi⁢𝑑μiϵ.\mathcal{Q}(\mu^{\epsilon})\leq-q_{-}+\sum_{i}\int\psi_{i}\,d\mu_{i}^{\epsilon}.

Each point of a smearing circle lies within d=3⁢ϵ≤3/16d=3\epsilon\leq 3/16 of the atom qq it replaces. Since s↦s⁢(1+log⁡(1/s))s\mapsto s(1+\log(1/s)) increases on (0,1](0,1], Lemma 4.3 bounds the change of 𝒰i\mathcal{U}_{i} by Bi⁢d⁢(1+log⁡(1/d))B_{i}d(1+\log(1/d)). For q∈[0,1]q\in[0,1], |p−q|≤d|p-q|\leq d and 0≤t≤10\leq t\leq 1, |∇plog⁡|3−p⁢t||≤t/|3−p⁢t|≤1|\nabla_{p}\log|3-pt||\leq t/|3-pt|\leq 1, so DiD_{i} changes by at most Mi⁢dM_{i}d. Counting masses, the coefficients of Bx,Bv,BzB_{x},B_{v},B_{z} are 22, 54⋅2+1=72\frac{5}{4}\cdot 2+1=\frac{7}{2} and 54+2=134\frac{5}{4}+2=\frac{13}{4}, and the DD terms give 54+54=52\frac{5}{4}+\frac{5}{4}=\frac{5}{2}. Hence

∑i∫ψi⁢𝑑μiϵ≤∑i∫ψi⁢𝑑μi+S⁢d⁢(1+log⁡(1/d))+52⁢d.\sum_{i}\int\psi_{i}\,d\mu_{i}^{\epsilon}\leq\sum_{i}\int\psi_{i}\,d\mu_{i}+Sd% (1+\log(1/d))+\tfrac{5}{2}d.

The atoms lie in (0,1](0,1], (0,1](0,1] and 𝒦z\mathcal{K}_{z}. Adding the original external terms of (4.10) turns ψi\psi_{i} into FiF_{i}, and (4.3) gives

log⁡|Φ|m2≤−q−+Kx+54⁢Kv+Kz+134⁢m⁢log⁡1ϵ+3⁢S⁢ϵ⁢(1+log⁡13⁢ϵ)+454⁢ϵ,\frac{\log|\Phi|}{m^{2}}\leq-q_{-}+K_{x}+\tfrac{5}{4}K_{v}+K_{z}+\frac{13}{4m}% \log\frac{1}{\epsilon}+3S\epsilon\Bigl{(}1+\log\frac{1}{3\epsilon}\Bigr{)}+% \frac{45}{4}\epsilon,

with 45/4=15/4+3⋅5/245/4=15/4+3\cdot 5/2. Multiply by m2m^{2}, put ϵ=m−2\epsilon=m^{-2}, add the logarithm (3⁢m2/2−m)⁢log⁡3−log⁡((m!)2⁢L!)(3m^{2}/2-m)\log 3-\log((m!)^{2}L!) of the prefactor in (2.5) and m⁢log⁡Trm\log T_{r}. By (4.5) this is (4.9).

For the last statement drop −log⁡((m!)2⁢L!)-\log((m!)^{2}L!) and m⁢log⁡(Tr/3)<0m\log(T_{r}/3)<0. As m≥4m\geq 4, 3⁢S⁢(1+2⁢log⁡m−log⁡3)≤6⁢S⁢log⁡m≤3⁢S⁢m⁢log⁡m3S(1+2\log m-\log 3)\leq 6S\log m\leq 3Sm\log m and 45/4≤3⁢m⁢log⁡m45/4\leq 3m\log m. So the right-hand side is at most −α⁢m2+(10+3⁢S)⁢m⁢log⁡m=−α⁢m2+C⁢m⁢log⁡m-\alpha m^{2}+(10+3S)m\log m=-\alpha m^{2}+Cm\log m. ∎

5. Nonvanishing

Let ℤ(17)={u/v∈ℚ:17∤v}\mathbb{Z}_{(17)}=\{u/v\in\mathbb{Q}:17\nmid v\}, and let v17v_{17} be the 1717-adic valuation, v17⁢(0)=+∞v_{17}(0)=+\infty.

Lemma 5.1.

For m=4m=4, coefficientwise in ℤ(17)⁢[T]\mathbb{Z}_{(17)}[T],

(5.1) G4⁢(T)≡g⁢(T):=11+5⁢T2+4⁢T4(mod17).G_{4}(T)\equiv g(T):=11+5T^{2}+4T^{4}\pmod{17}.
Proof.

Here I={2,…,5}I=\{2,\ldots,5\}, J={1,…,9}J=\{1,\ldots,9\}, Λ={1}\Lambda=\{1\}, and all denominators divide 6350400=252026350400=2520^{2}, prime to 1717. Modulo 1717 the matrix (2.1) is

(5.2) (110161577313951601411449581514081612121087118071422616+8⁢T413103151485416+7⁢T513145163513513+4⁢T4105669101343+12⁢T1614115961373515212).\begin{pmatrix}11&0&16&15&7&7&3&13&9\\ 5&16&0&14&11&4&4&9&5\\ 8&15&14&0&8&16&12&12&10\\ 8&7&11&8&0&7&14&2&2\\ 6&16+8T&4&13&10&3&15&14&8\\ 5&4&16+7T&5&13&14&5&16&3\\ 5&13&5&13+4T&4&10&5&6&6\\ 9&10&13&4&3+12T&16&14&1&15\\ 9&6&13&7&3&5&15&2&12\end{pmatrix}.

Its determinant is g⁢(T)g(T). Reduction of (2.6), where 9/67228000000000≡13(mod17)9/67228000000000\equiv 13\pmod{17} and (q0,q1,q2,q3,q4)≡(10,0,3,0,16)(mod17)(q_{0},q_{1},q_{2},q_{3},q_{4})\equiv(10,0,3,0,16)\pmod{17}, gives the same polynomial. ∎

Lemma 5.2.

Let ξ∈ℚ\xi\in\mathbb{Q}. For every integer t≥1t\geq 1 with 2⁢t+v17⁢(ξ)>02t+v_{17}(\xi)>0, G4⋅17t⁢(ξ)≠0G_{4\cdot 17^{t}}(\xi)\neq 0.

Proof.

Put Qt=17tQ_{t}=17^{t}, mt=4⁢Qtm_{t}=4Q_{t} and h=σ=k=Qth=\sigma=k=Q_{t}, and

(5.3) Pt⁢(W)=Qt3⁢mt+h⁢Gmt⁢(W/Qt2).P_{t}(W)=Q_{t}^{3m_{t}+h}G_{m_{t}}(W/Q_{t}^{2}).

This is the determinant obtained after T=W/Qt2T=W/Q_{t}^{2} by multiplying the CC, B−T⁢AB-TA and VV rows by QtQ_{t}, Qt2Q_{t}^{2} and QtQ_{t}. The middle rows become Qt2⁢B−W⁢AQ_{t}^{2}B-WA. Every nonzero index, difference and Cauchy denominator has absolute value less than 17⁢Qt17Q_{t}, hence 1717-adic valuation at most tt. So Qt⁢tiQ_{t}t_{i} and Qt2⁢biQ_{t}^{2}b_{i} lie in ℤ(17)\mathbb{Z}_{(17)}, and for i≠ji\neq j

Qt2⁢Bi⁢j=Qtj−i⁢(Qt⁢ti−Qt⁢tj),Qt⁢Ci⁢j=Qtj−i⁢(ai−aj),Qt⁢Vℓ⁢j=Qtj+ℓ,Q_{t}^{2}B_{ij}=\frac{Q_{t}}{j-i}\,(Q_{t}t_{i}-Q_{t}t_{j}),\qquad Q_{t}C_{ij}=% \frac{Q_{t}}{j-i}\,(a^{i}-a^{j}),\qquad Q_{t}V_{\ell j}=\frac{Q_{t}}{j+\ell},

with v17⁢(j−i),v17⁢(j+ℓ)≤tv_{17}(j-i),v_{17}(j+\ell)\leq t. So all entries of the scaled matrix lie in ℤ(17)⁢[W]\mathbb{Z}_{(17)}[W]. Hence Pt∈ℤ(17)⁢[W]P_{t}\in\mathbb{Z}_{(17)}[W].

Let 0≤u<Qt0\leq u<Q_{t}. Only the summation indices divisible by QtQ_{t} survive, and aQt≡a(mod17)a^{Q_{t}}\equiv a\pmod{17}, so

Qt⁢tQt⁢j+u≡au⁢tj,Qt2⁢bQt⁢j+u≡au⁢bj(mod17).Q_{t}t_{Q_{t}j+u}\equiv a^{u}t_{j},\qquad Q_{t}^{2}b_{Q_{t}j+u}\equiv a^{u}b_{% j}\pmod{17}.

The scaled CC and BB entries vanish modulo 1717 between distinct residue classes modulo QtQ_{t}. In the class uu write i=Qt⁢i0+ui=Q_{t}i_{0}+u, j=Qt⁢j0+uj=Q_{t}j_{0}+u. Then 2≤i0≤52\leq i_{0}\leq 5, 1≤j0≤91\leq j_{0}\leq 9, and Ai⁢i≡au⁢Ai0⁢i0A_{ii}\equiv a^{u}A_{i_{0}i_{0}}. The only VV row in this class is ℓ=Qt−u\ell=Q_{t}-u, with

Qtj+ℓ=1j0+1.\frac{Q_{t}}{j+\ell}=\frac{1}{j_{0}+1}.

Cross-class CC and BB entries have 1717-adic valuation at least 11. Within a class the nonzero differences j0−i0j_{0}-i_{0} satisfy |j0−i0|≤7<17|j_{0}-i_{0}|\leq 7<17 and are units. All other scaled VV entries vanish modulo 1717. So, after permutations, the matrix has QtQ_{t} diagonal blocks

[au⁢C4au⁢(B4−W⁢A4)V4],0≤u<Qt,\begin{bmatrix}a^{u}C_{4}\\ a^{u}(B_{4}-WA_{4})\\ V_{4}\end{bmatrix},\qquad 0\leq u<Q_{t},

where the subscript 44 refers to G4G_{4}. Each block has eight rows with the factor aua^{u}. Hence

(5.4) Pt⁢(W)≡εt⁢ 34⁢Qt⁢(Qt−1)⁢g⁢(W)Qt(mod17),εt∈{1,−1},P_{t}(W)\equiv\varepsilon_{t}\,3^{4Q_{t}(Q_{t}-1)}g(W)^{Q_{t}}\pmod{17},\qquad% \varepsilon_{t}\in\{1,-1\},

coefficientwise. In particular Pt⁢(0)≡±34⁢Qt⁢(Qt−1)⁢11Qt≢0(mod17)P_{t}(0)\equiv\pm 3^{4Q_{t}(Q_{t}-1)}11^{Q_{t}}\not\equiv 0\pmod{17}.

Take W=Qt2⁢ξW=Q_{t}^{2}\xi. Then v17⁢(W)=2⁢t+v17⁢(ξ)>0v_{17}(W)=2t+v_{17}(\xi)>0, and since Pt∈ℤ(17)⁢[W]P_{t}\in\mathbb{Z}_{(17)}[W], Pt⁢(W)≡Pt⁢(0)≢0(mod17)P_{t}(W)\equiv P_{t}(0)\not\equiv 0\pmod{17}. By (5.3), Gmt⁢(ξ)≠0G_{m_{t}}(\xi)\neq 0. ∎

The restriction 2⁢t+v17⁢(ξ)>02t+v_{17}(\xi)>0 is needed in this argument: gg has the roots 77 and 1010 in 𝔽17\mathbb{F}_{17}.

6. Proof of Theorem 1

Suppose θ=u/q0\theta=u/q_{0} with u∈ℤu\in\mathbb{Z} and q0∈ℤ>0q_{0}\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0}. By Lemmas 2.1 and 3.5,

Zm:=q0m⁢Km⁢Gm⁢(u/q0)∈ℤ.Z_{m}:=q_{0}^{m}K_{m}G_{m}(u/q_{0})\in\mathbb{Z}.

By Lemma 5.2 with ξ=θ\xi=\theta, Zm≠0Z_{m}\neq 0 for m=4⋅17tm=4\cdot 17^{t} and all large tt. By Lemmas 3.5 and 4.4,

log⁡|Zm|≤−(α0−τ)⁢m2+C⁢m⁢log⁡m+o⁢(m2)+m⁢log⁡q0.\log|Z_{m}|\leq-(\alpha_{0}-\tau)m^{2}+Cm\log m+o(m^{2})+m\log q_{0}.

As α0−τ>0.00305>0\alpha_{0}-\tau>0.00305>0, the right-hand side tends to −∞-\infty along this sequence. So 0<|Zm|<10<|Z_{m}|<1 for large tt, which is impossible. ∎

Appendix A Arithmetic integration

Table A lists the lines (3.7) for the seam R=8R=8. The index ranges are the integer solutions of 4⁢z0/5−1<k<z0⁢R4z_{0}/5-1<k<z_{0}R and 1≤w<R/4+11\leq w<R/4+1 (Section 3).

Table A.2 gives, for ρ0<ρ<ρ1\rho_{0}<\rho<\rho_{1}, the function 𝔠⁢(ρ)=c0+c1⁢ρ\mathfrak{c}(\rho)=c_{0}+c_{1}\rho. Consecutive rows share an endpoint. The first row starts at 1/R1/R and the last ends at 5/45/4. The rows are the 7676 open intervals of (1/R,5/4)∖𝒞(1/R,5/4)\setminus\mathcal{C}, so a row can be checked at one interior point ρ\rho: the six cells of (3.2) at ρ\rho give an affine function of ρ\rho, which must equal c0+c1⁢ρc_{0}+c_{1}\rho. Then

∫1/R5/4𝔠⁢(ρ)⁢𝑑ρ=∑rows(ρ1−ρ0)⁢(c0+c1⁢ρ0+ρ12).\int_{1/R}^{5/4}\mathfrak{c}(\rho)\,d\rho=\sum_{\rm rows}(\rho_{1}-\rho_{0})% \Bigl{(}c_{0}+c_{1}\frac{\rho_{0}+\rho_{1}}{2}\Bigr{)}.
Table A.1. Line families of (3.7).
family lines count
strip x=0x=0, x=ρx=\rho 22
ℒ\mathcal{L} lower x=1/4−k⁢ρx=1/4-k\rho, 0≤k≤10\leq k\leq 1 22
KK lower x=1/2−k⁢ρx=1/2-k\rho, 0≤k≤30\leq k\leq 3 44
KK upper x=3/2−k⁢ρx=3/2-k\rho, 1≤k≤111\leq k\leq 11 1111
ℒ\mathcal{L} upper x=5/2−k⁢ρx=5/2-k\rho, 2≤k≤192\leq k\leq 19 1818
WW x=w⁢ρ−1/4x=w\rho-1/4, 1≤w≤21\leq w\leq 2 22
total 3939
Table A.2. The affine pieces of 𝔠\mathfrak{c} on (1/R,5/4)(1/R,5/4), R=8R=8: 𝔠⁢(ρ)=c0+c1⁢ρ\mathfrak{c}(\rho)=c_{0}+c_{1}\rho for ρ0<ρ<ρ1\rho_{0}<\rho<\rho_{1}.
ρ0\rho_{0} ρ1\rho_{1} c0c_{0} c1c_{1} ρ0\rho_{0} ρ1\rho_{1} c0c_{0} c1c_{1} ρ0\rho_{0} ρ1\rho_{1} c0c_{0} c1c_{1}
1/81/8 11/8411/84 9/29/2 −10-10 2/112/11 11/6011/60 11/411/4 22 1/31/3 11/3211/32 9/29/2 −4-4
11/8411/84 5/385/38 7/47/4 1111 11/6011/60 3/163/16 11/411/4 22 11/3211/32 7/207/20 7/47/4 44
5/385/38 9/689/68 17/417/4 −8-8 3/163/16 5/265/26 1/21/2 1414 7/207/20 5/145/14 7/27/2 −1-1
9/689/68 2/152/15 17/417/4 −8-8 5/265/26 7/367/36 33 11 5/145/14 3/83/8 66 −8-8
2/152/15 7/527/52 9/49/4 77 7/367/36 11/5611/56 19/419/4 −8-8 3/83/8 11/2811/28 15/415/4 −2-2
7/527/52 3/223/22 44 −6-6 11/5611/56 1/51/5 22 66 11/2811/28 2/52/5 15/415/4 −2-2
3/223/22 11/8011/80 5/25/2 55 1/51/5 9/449/44 33 11 2/52/5 5/125/12 7/47/4 33
11/8011/80 5/365/36 5/25/2 55 9/449/44 5/245/24 21/421/4 −10-10 5/125/12 7/167/16 1/21/2 66
5/365/36 9/649/64 5/45/4 1414 5/245/24 11/5211/52 44 −4-4 7/167/16 9/209/20 9/49/4 22
9/649/64 1/71/7 7/27/2 −2-2 11/5211/52 3/143/14 44 −4-4 9/209/20 11/2411/24 9/29/2 −3-3
1/71/7 11/7611/76 9/29/2 −9-9 3/143/14 7/327/32 5/25/2 33 11/2411/24 1/21/2 7/47/4 33
11/7611/76 7/487/48 7/47/4 1010 7/327/32 2/92/9 17/417/4 −5-5 1/21/2 11/2011/20 19/419/4 −3-3
7/487/48 5/345/34 7/27/2 −2-2 2/92/9 9/409/40 9/49/4 44 11/2011/20 9/169/16 22 22
5/345/34 3/203/20 66 −19-19 9/409/40 5/225/22 9/49/4 44 9/169/16 7/127/12 17/417/4 −2-2
3/203/20 11/7211/72 15/415/4 −4-4 5/225/22 11/4811/48 19/419/4 −7-7 7/127/12 5/85/8 66 −5-5
11/7211/72 2/132/13 15/415/4 −4-4 11/4811/48 1/41/4 22 55 5/85/8 2/32/3 19/419/4 −3-3
2/132/13 5/325/32 7/47/4 99 1/41/4 11/4011/40 9/29/2 −5-5 2/32/3 11/1611/16 11/411/4 0
5/325/32 7/447/44 1/21/2 1717 11/4011/40 5/185/18 7/47/4 55 11/1611/16 3/43/4 11/411/4 0
7/447/44 9/569/56 9/49/4 66 5/185/18 9/329/32 17/417/4 −4-4 3/43/4 5/65/6 1/21/2 33
9/569/56 11/6811/68 9/29/2 −8-8 9/329/32 2/72/7 17/417/4 −4-4 5/65/6 7/87/8 33 0
11/6811/68 1/61/6 7/47/4 99 2/72/7 7/247/24 9/49/4 33 7/87/8 11/1211/12 19/419/4 −2-2
1/61/6 11/6411/64 19/419/4 −9-9 7/247/24 3/103/10 44 −3-3 11/1211/12 11 19/419/4 −2-2
11/6411/64 9/529/52 22 77 3/103/10 11/3611/36 5/25/2 22 11 9/89/8 15/415/4 −1-1
9/529/52 7/407/40 17/417/4 −6-6 11/3611/36 5/165/16 5/25/2 22 9/89/8 5/45/4 66 −3-3
7/407/40 5/285/28 66 −16-16 5/165/16 9/289/28 5/45/4 66
5/285/28 2/112/11 19/419/4 −9-9 9/289/28 1/31/3 7/27/2 −1-1

With (3.8),

A=1332+∫1/R5/4𝔠⁢(ρ)⁢𝑑ρ+4532,A=\frac{13}{32}+\int_{1/R}^{5/4}\mathfrak{c}(\rho)\,d\rho+\frac{45}{32},

the constant of (3.12). The coefficient of log⁡3\log 3 is 53/4853/48, and the block (3.5) contributes −5/48-5/48 to (3.8).

Appendix B Certified values

Table B.1 gives the energy of ν\nu. Here νzint\nu_{z}^{\rm int} and νzPoi\nu_{z}^{\rm Poi} are the interval and Poisson parts of νz\nu_{z}, IintI_{\rm int} is the energy of νzint\nu_{z}^{\rm int}, Imix=I⁢(νzint,νzPoi)I_{\rm mix}=I(\nu_{z}^{\rm int},\nu_{z}^{\rm Poi}), IPoiI_{\rm Poi} is the energy of νzPoi\nu_{z}^{\rm Poi}, and

𝒬⁢(ν)=I⁢(νx,νx)+I⁢(νv,νv)+Iint+2⁢Imix+IPoi+I⁢(νv,νzint)+I⁢(νv,νzPoi)−D⁢(νx,νv).\mathcal{Q}(\nu)=I(\nu_{x},\nu_{x})+I(\nu_{v},\nu_{v})+I_{\rm int}+2I_{\rm mix% }+I_{\rm Poi}+I(\nu_{v},\nu_{z}^{\rm int})+I(\nu_{v},\nu_{z}^{\rm Poi})-D(\nu_% {x},\nu_{v}).

Every displayed interval is outward rounded, and the row of D⁢(νx,νv)D(\nu_{x},\nu_{v}) contains the tail ℰN\mathcal{E}_{N}. The interval sum of the first eight rows, with these coefficients, exceeds q−q_{-}, which is (4.2).

Table B.1. The pair decomposition of 𝒬⁢(ν)\mathcal{Q}(\nu) and its enclosures.
term outward enclosure
I⁢(νx,νx)I(\nu_{x},\nu_{x}) [-1.604087582665193,-1.604087582665192]
I⁢(νv,νv)I(\nu_{v},\nu_{v}) [-2.279694146532524,-2.279694146532523]
IintI_{\rm int} [-0.159655877431972,-0.159655877431971]
ImixI_{\rm mix} [0.226965417324502,0.226965417324503]
IPoiI_{\rm Poi} [-0.495113146744583,-0.495113146744582]
I⁢(νv,νzint)I(\nu_{v},\nu_{z}^{\rm int}) [0.278231287125003,0.278231287125004]
I⁢(νv,νzPoi)I(\nu_{v},\nu_{z}^{\rm Poi}) [-0.191796788958401,-0.191796788958400]
D⁢(νx,νv)D(\nu_{x},\nu_{v}) [1.195386024949843,1.195386024949844]
𝒬⁢(ν)\mathcal{Q}(\nu) [-5.193571445508505,-5.193571445508504]
Table B.2. The caps (4.3): leaves of Lemma C.1, the largest upper bound over the leaves (rounded upward at 10−610^{-6}) and the cap. On 𝒦z\mathcal{K}_{z} the cap is Kz=max⁡(0.04318,0.04283)=0.04318K_{z}=\max(0.04318,0.04283)=0.04318.
support leaves upper bound cap
x∈[ε0,1]x\in[\varepsilon_{0},1] 6758467584 −4.831488-4.831488 −4.83148-4.83148
v∈[ε0,1]v\in[\varepsilon_{0},1] 3712037120 −4.743190-4.743190 −4.74318-4.74318
z∈[1,3]z\in[1,3] 1356813568 0.0431780.043178 0.043180.04318
|z|=r|z|=r, Im⁡z≥0\operatorname{Im}z\geq 0 81928192 0.0428230.042823 0.042830.04283

Appendix C Reference measure and subdivision

Terminating decimals are exact. Other values are printed as fractions p/qp/q.

C.1. Intervals

Table C.1 gives νx\nu_{x}, νv\nu_{v} and νzint\nu_{z}^{\rm int}. Each is a chain of adjacent intervals. Its heading gives the start point b0b_{0}, and its row (k,bk,wk)(k,b_{k},w_{k}) is the interval [bk−1,bk][b_{k-1},b_{k}] carrying wk⁢d⁢t/(bk−bk−1)w_{k}\,dt/(b_{k}-b_{k-1}). The three chains have 131131, 143143 and 105105 rows and end at 11, 11 and 33. Outside its chain a part vanishes. The masses are 11, 5/45/4 and 170340748021/500000000000170340748021/500000000000.

Table C.1. Interval chains of the reference measure. A line gives the rows (k,bk,wk)(k,b_{k},w_{k}), (k+1,bk+1,wk+1)(k+1,b_{k+1},w_{k+1}) and (k+2,bk+2,wk+2)(k+2,b_{k+2},w_{k+2}).
kk bkb_{k} wkw_{k} bk+1b_{k+1} wk+1w_{k+1} bk+2b_{k+2} wk+2w_{k+2}
νx\nu_{x}: b0=0.08426519384873b_{0}=0.08426519384873
1 0.093794260.09379426 0.0048786680.004878668 0.10332330.1033233 0.0053886180.005388618 0.11370170.1137017 0.0069940530.006994053
4 0.12408010.1240801 0.0075690040.007569004 0.13526340.1352634 0.0085640160.008564016 0.14644660.1464466 0.0088180970.008818097
7 0.15838690.1583869 0.0095900980.009590098 0.17032710.1703271 0.0096923720.009692372 0.18297320.1829732 0.01032320.0103232
10 0.19561930.1956193 0.010344850.01034485 0.20891710.2089171 0.010876420.01087642 0.22221490.2222149 0.01085770.0108577
13 0.23610740.2361074 0.011311390.01131139 0.250.25 0.011271060.01127106 0.26442780.2644278 0.011660850.01166085
16 0.27885570.2788557 0.011613650.01161365 0.2937570.293757 0.011948750.01194875 0.30865830.3086583 0.011903870.01190387
19 0.32396930.3239693 0.012190790.01219079 0.33928030.3392803 0.012154940.01215494 0.35493540.3549354 0.012397960.01239796
22 0.37059050.3705905 0.012374910.01237491 0.38652270.3865227 0.012578140.01257814 0.40245480.4024548 0.012570390.01257039
25 0.41859590.4185959 0.012736790.01273679 0.43473690.4347369 0.012747780.01274778 0.45101770.4510177 0.012878790.01287879
28 0.46729840.4672984 0.012909650.01290965 0.48364920.4836492 0.013006650.01300665 0.50.5 0.013058580.01305858
31 0.51635080.5163508 0.013122260.01312226 0.53270160.5327016 0.013198180.01319818 0.54898230.5489823 0.013227690.01322769
34 0.56526310.5652631 0.013327810.01332781 0.58140410.5814041 0.013325930.01332593 0.59754520.5975452 0.013450340.01345034
37 0.61347730.6134773 0.013415140.01341514 0.62940950.6294095 0.013567880.01356788 0.64506460.6450646 0.013497740.01349774
40 0.66071970.6607197 0.013679220.01367922 0.67603070.6760307 0.013573960.01357396 0.69134170.6913417 0.013787710.01378771
43 0.7062430.706243 0.013641480.01364148 0.72114430.7211443 0.013892630.01389263 0.73557220.7355722 0.013705710.01370571
46 0.750.75 0.013993460.01399346 0.76389260.7638926 0.013764030.01376403 0.77778510.7777851 0.014088740.01408874
49 0.79108290.7910829 0.013813730.01381373 0.80438070.8043807 0.014188460.01418846 0.81702680.8170268 0.013857030.01385703
52 0.82967290.8296729 0.014279750.01427975 0.84161310.8416131 0.013897190.01389719 0.85355340.8535534 0.014371420.01437142
55 0.86473660.8647366 0.013924210.01392421 0.87591990.8759199 0.01446710.0144671 0.88629830.8862983 0.013943310.01394331
58 0.89667670.8966767 0.01455470.0145547 0.90620570.9062057 0.013948950.01394895 0.91573480.9157348 0.01465630.0146563
61 0.92437380.9243738 0.013944650.01394465 0.93301270.9330127 0.014754760.01475476 0.94072450.9407245 0.013921360.01392136
64 0.94843640.9484364 0.014855330.01485533 0.95518810.9551881 0.013876910.01387691 0.96193980.9619398 0.014979380.01497938
67 0.96770240.9677024 0.013790060.01379006 0.97346510.9734651 0.015130130.01513013 0.9782140.978214 0.013646070.01364607
70 0.98296290.9829629 0.015348246070.01534824607 0.98648150.9864815 0.012644690.01264469 0.990.99 0.014680050.01468005
73 0.99019630.9901963 0.00093047980.0009304798 0.99039260.9903926 0.00081769460.0008176946 0.99238460.9923846 0.0095260880.009526088
76 0.99437660.9943766 0.010987530.01098753 0.99504950.9950495 0.0042827780.004282778 0.99572240.9957224 0.0043577940.004357794
79 0.99628010.9962801 0.0039078970.003907897 0.99683770.9968377 0.0041989660.004198966 0.99752970.9975297 0.0057609080.005760908
82 0.99822170.9982217 0.0067805320.006780532 0.99857560.9985756 0.0039095060.003909506 0.99892950.9989295 0.0045194280.004519428
85 0.99894980.9989498 0.00029786460.0002978646 0.99897020.9989702 0.00027591060.0002759106 0.99898510.9989851 0.00020575530.0002057553
88 0.9990.999 0.00020639480.0002063948 0.99904310.9990431 0.00061063050.0006106305 0.99908620.9990862 0.00062010.0006201
91 0.99917310.9991731 0.0013048770.001304877 0.99925990.9992599 0.001375480.00137548 0.99934880.9993488 0.0014925870.001492587
94 0.99943770.9994377 0.0016077450.001607745 0.99945120.9994512 0.00025617170.0002561717 0.99946470.9994647 0.00024623610.0002462361
97 0.99956720.9995672 0.0020588410.002058841 0.99966960.9996696 0.0023559550.002355955 0.99967670.9996767 0.00018149950.0001814995
100 0.99968380.9996838 0.00016332330.0001633233 0.9997530.999753 0.001819670.00181967 0.99982220.9998222 0.0021438870.002143887
103 0.99983270.9998327 0.00036876290.0003687629 0.99984320.9998432 0.00035548930.0003554893 0.99987160.9998716 0.0010510550.001051055
106 0.99990.9999 0.0011862250.001186225 0.99992190.9999219 0.0010226220.001022622 0.99994380.9999438 0.0012046020.001204602
109 0.99995150.9999515 0.00047871530.0004787153 0.99995930.9999593 0.00051569370.0005156937 0.99996380.9999638 0.00032589940.0003258994
112 0.99996840.9999684 0.0003436690.000343669 0.99997530.9999753 0.0005753190.000575319 0.99998220.9999822 0.0006760040.000676004
115 0.99998610.9999861 0.00043126480.0004312648 0.999990.99999 0.00050666440.0005066644 0.99999220.9999922 0.00032328570.0003232857
118 0.99999440.9999944 0.00037983820.0003798382 0.99999560.9999956 0.00024237030.0002423703 0.99999680.9999968 0.00028477430.0002847743
121 0.99999750.9999975 0.0001817130.000181713 0.99999820.9999982 0.00021350550.0002135055 0.99999860.9999986 0.00013623650.0001362365
124 0.9999990.999999 0.00016007140.0001600714 0.99999920.9999992 0.00010214010.0001021401 0.99999940.9999994 0.00012000760.0001200076
127 0.99999960.9999996 0.000076574290.00007657429 0.99999970.9999997 0.000089966470.00008996647 0.99999980.9999998 0.000057404270.00005740427
130 0.99999990.9999999 0.00011046810.0001104681 11 0.00033139660.0003313966
νv\nu_{v}: b0=0.00960735979838b_{0}=0.00960735979838
1 0.013322220.01332222 0.0016567340.001656734 0.017037090.01703709 0.005424870.00542487 0.021786010.02178601 0.0080722680.008072268
4 0.026534940.02653494 0.0082803990.008280399 0.032297580.03229758 0.0098878510.009887851 0.038060230.03806023 0.0095617010.009561701
7 0.044811930.04481193 0.010771750.01077175 0.051563630.05156363 0.010303860.01030386 0.059275460.05927546 0.011283660.01128366
10 0.06698730.0669873 0.010798120.01079812 0.075626250.07562625 0.011631290.01163129 0.084265190.08426519 0.011166640.01116664
13 0.093794260.09379426 0.011887840.01188784 0.10332330.1033233 0.011461280.01146128 0.11370170.1137017 0.012092650.01209265
16 0.12408010.1240801 0.011715820.01171582 0.13526340.1352634 0.012279610.01227961 0.14644660.1464466 0.01194440.0119444
19 0.15838690.1583869 0.012448860.01244886 0.17032710.1703271 0.012160450.01216045 0.18297320.1829732 0.012616110.01261611
22 0.19561930.1956193 0.012367270.01236727 0.20891710.2089171 0.01278430.0127843 0.22221490.2222149 0.01257450.0125745
25 0.23610740.2361074 0.012951370.01295137 0.250.25 0.012782150.01278215 0.26442780.2644278 0.013125390.01312539
28 0.27885570.2788557 0.012989950.01298995 0.2937570.293757 0.013300750.01330075 0.30865830.3086583 0.013198740.01319874
31 0.32396930.3239693 0.013477290.01347729 0.33928030.3392803 0.013407070.01340707 0.35493540.3549354 0.013652230.01365223
34 0.37059050.3705905 0.013609870.01360987 0.38652270.3865227 0.013819090.01381909 0.40245480.4024548 0.013788930.01378893
37 0.41859590.4185959 0.013984870.01398487 0.43473690.4347369 0.014018750.01401875 0.45101770.4510177 0.014178340.01417834
40 0.46729840.4672984 0.0142270.014227 0.48364920.4836492 0.014348490.01434849 0.50.5 0.014420080.01442008
43 0.51635080.5163508 0.014504780.01450478 0.53270160.5327016 0.014602880.01460288 0.54898230.5489823 0.014648880.01464888
46 0.56526310.5652631 0.014772830.01477283 0.58140410.5814041 0.014783050.01478305 0.59754520.5975452 0.014932370.01493237
49 0.61347730.6134773 0.014903850.01490385 0.62940950.6294095 0.015083170.01508317 0.64506460.6450646 0.015013680.01501368
52 0.66071970.6607197 0.015223170.01522317 0.67603070.6760307 0.015112530.01511253 0.69134170.6913417 0.015356070.01535607
55 0.7062430.706243 0.015197630.01519763 0.72114430.7211443 0.015481080.01548108 0.73557220.7355722 0.015275320.01527532
58 0.750.75 0.015597710.01559771 0.76389260.7638926 0.015342760.01534276 0.77778510.7777851 0.01570470.0157047
61 0.79108290.7910829 0.015397360.01539736 0.80438070.8043807 0.015813450.01581345 0.81702680.8170268 0.015441950.01544195
64 0.82967290.8296729 0.015910080.01591008 0.84161310.8416131 0.01548060.0154806 0.85355340.8535534 0.016004810.01600481
67 0.86473660.8647366 0.015502640.01550264 0.87591990.8759199 0.016102110.01610211 0.88629830.8862983 0.015514370.01551437
70 0.89667670.8966767 0.016189080.01618908 0.90620570.9062057 0.015510110.01551011 0.91573480.9157348 0.016290580.01629058
73 0.92437380.9243738 0.015494240.01549424 0.93301270.9330127 0.016388170.01638817 0.94072450.9407245 0.015457180.01545718
76 0.94843640.9484364 0.01648810.0164881 0.95518810.9551881 0.015396980.01539698 0.96193980.9619398 0.01661440.0166144
79 0.96770240.9677024 0.015290570.01529057 0.97346510.9734651 0.016771050.01677105 0.9782140.978214 0.015121970.01512197
82 0.98296290.9829629 0.017003371850.01700337185 0.98648150.9864815 0.014005310.01400531 0.990.99 0.016255950.01625595
85 0.99019630.9901963 0.0010302020.001030202 0.99039260.9903926 0.00090547350.0009054735 0.99238460.9923846 0.010546990.01054699
88 0.99437660.9943766 0.01216350.0121635 0.99504950.9950495 0.0047406790.004740679 0.99572240.9957224 0.0048236870.004823687
91 0.99628010.9962801 0.0043255060.004325506 0.99683770.9968377 0.0046475270.004647527 0.99752970.9975297 0.0063760760.006376076
94 0.99822170.9982217 0.0075042220.007504222 0.99857560.9985756 0.0043266530.004326653 0.99892950.9989295 0.0050015310.005001531
97 0.99894980.9989498 0.00032963270.0003296327 0.99897020.9989702 0.00030534040.0003053404 0.99898510.9989851 0.00022770130.0002277013
100 0.9990.999 0.00022840920.0002284092 0.99904310.9990431 0.0006757590.000675759 0.99908620.9990862 0.00068623730.0006862373
103 0.99917310.9991731 0.0014440430.001444043 0.99925990.9992599 0.0015221670.001522167 0.99934880.9993488 0.0016517550.001651755
106 0.99943770.9994377 0.0017791820.001779182 0.99945120.9994512 0.00028348680.0002834868 0.99946470.9994647 0.00027249260.0002724926
109 0.99956720.9995672 0.0022783630.002278363 0.99966960.9996696 0.0026071380.002607138 0.99967670.9996767 0.00020084940.0002008494
112 0.99968380.9996838 0.00018073610.0001807361 0.9997530.999753 0.0020136660.002013666 0.99982220.9998222 0.0023724350.002372435
115 0.99983270.9998327 0.00040807370.0004080737 0.99984320.9998432 0.00039338540.0003933854 0.99987160.9998716 0.0011630990.001163099
118 0.99990.9999 0.0013126750.001312675 0.99992190.9999219 0.0011316310.001131631 0.99994380.9999438 0.0013330070.001333007
121 0.99995150.9999515 0.00052974370.0005297437 0.99995930.9999593 0.00057066350.0005706635 0.99996380.9999638 0.00036063810.0003606381
124 0.99996840.9999684 0.00038030180.0003803018 0.99997530.9999753 0.00063664390.0006366439 0.99998220.9999822 0.00074806090.0007480609
127 0.99998610.9999861 0.00047723410.0004772341 0.999990.99999 0.00056067070.0005606707 0.99999220.9999922 0.00035774520.0003577452
130 0.99999440.9999944 0.00042032560.0004203256 0.99999560.9999956 0.0002682050.000268205 0.99999680.9999968 0.00031512860.0003151286
133 0.99999750.9999975 0.0002010820.000201082 0.99999820.9999982 0.00023626330.0002362633 0.99999860.9999986 0.00015075810.0001507581
136 0.9999990.999999 0.00017713350.0001771335 0.99999920.9999992 0.00011302730.0001130273 0.99999940.9999994 0.00013279940.0001327994
139 0.99999960.9999996 0.000084736360.00008473636 0.99999970.9999997 0.000099556190.00009955619 0.99999980.9999998 0.00006352290.0000635229
142 0.99999990.9999999 0.0001222430.000122243 11 0.00036672060.0003667206
νzint\nu_{z}^{\rm int}: b0=28303039933611/17500000000000b_{0}=28303039933611/17500000000000
1 1.6479391.647939 0.0008000390.000800039 1.6785611.678561 0.0016340180.001634018 1.7098711.709871 0.0021957220.002195722
4 1.7411811.741181 0.0025698870.002569887 1.7730451.773045 0.0029413590.002941359 1.804911.80491 0.0032065110.003206511
7 1.8371921.837192 0.0034922920.003492292 1.8694741.869474 0.0037074470.003707447 1.9020351.902035 0.0039351080.003935108
10 1.9345971.934597 0.0041189140.004118914 1.9672981.967298 0.004309090.00430909 22 0.0044695240.004469524
13 2.0327022.032702 0.004625880.00462588 2.0654032.065403 0.0047774430.004777443 2.0979652.097965 0.0049015020.004901502
16 2.1305262.130526 0.0050457690.005045769 2.1628082.162808 0.0051450230.005145023 2.195092.19509 0.0052849740.005284974
19 2.2269552.226955 0.0053580490.005358049 2.2588192.258819 0.0055006290.005500629 2.2901292.290129 0.0055474220.005547422
22 2.3214392.321439 0.0056935620.005693562 2.3520612.352061 0.0057161040.005716104 2.3826832.382683 0.0058691120.005869112
25 2.4124862.412486 0.00586430.0058643 2.4422892.442289 0.0060288790.006028879 2.4711442.471144 0.005998050.00599805
28 2.52.5 0.006173740.00617374 2.5277852.527785 0.00611670.0061167 2.555572.55557 0.0063046480.006304648
31 2.5821662.582166 0.006220330.00622033 2.6087612.608761 0.006428160.00642816 2.6340542.634054 0.0063114120.006311412
34 2.6593462.659346 0.0065382530.006538253 2.6832262.683226 0.0063927050.006392705 2.7071072.707107 0.0066405910.006640591
37 2.7294732.729473 0.0064596660.006459666 2.751842.75184 0.0067378540.006737854 2.7725972.772597 0.0065159460.006515946
40 2.7933532.793353 0.0068244220.006824422 2.8124112.812411 0.0065594830.006559483 2.831472.83147 0.0069121010.006912101
43 2.8487482.848748 0.0065926250.006592625 2.8660252.866025 0.0069927280.006992728 2.8814492.881449 0.0066114070.006611407
46 2.8968732.896873 0.0070694170.007069417 2.9103762.910376 0.0066153460.006615346 2.923882.92388 0.0071529910.007152991
49 2.9354052.935405 0.0065944390.006594439 2.946932.94693 0.007244780.00724478 2.9564282.956428 0.0065431480.006543148
52 2.9659262.965926 0.0073582820.007358282 2.9733562.973356 0.006432430.00643243 2.9807852.980785 0.0075381035280.007538103528
55 2.9853932.985393 0.005327010.00532701 2.992.99 0.0064212160.006421216 2.9907222.990722 0.0011614620.001161462
58 2.9914452.991445 0.0011276660.001127666 2.9929112.992911 0.0024981850.002498185 2.9943772.994377 0.0027957140.002795714
61 2.9956072.995607 0.002614790.00261479 2.9968382.996838 0.0030809480.003080948 2.9973482.997348 0.0014363160.001436316
64 2.9978592.997859 0.0015926020.001592602 2.99792.9979 0.00013948520.0001394852 2.997942.99794 0.0001325490.000132549
67 2.9980562.998056 0.00039092910.0003909291 2.9981722.998172 0.00040392910.0004039291 2.9981972.998197 0.000087335820.00008733582
70 2.9982222.998222 0.000086265310.00008626531 2.9983712.998371 0.00054586440.0005458644 2.998522.99852 0.00056865280.0005686528
73 2.9987252.998725 0.00083289350.0008328935 2.9989292.998929 0.00091097510.0009109751 2.9989652.998965 0.00016650630.0001665063
76 2.9992.999 0.00016171290.0001617129 2.999172.99917 0.00084514660.0008451466 2.9993392.999339 0.00094897540.0009489754
79 2.9993882.999388 0.00029824470.0002982447 2.9994382.999438 0.00030024940.0003002494 2.9995612.999561 0.00082707910.0008270791
82 2.9996842.999684 0.00097305420.0009730542 2.9996852.999685 0.000012669740.00001266974 2.9996862.999686 0.0000094343840.000009434384
85 2.9997542.999754 0.00061052420.0006105242 2.9998222.999822 0.00071531160.0007153116 2.9998612.999861 0.00046471030.0004647103
88 2.99992.9999 0.00054737790.0005473779 2.9999092.999909 0.00014643550.0001464355 2.9999192.999919 0.00014874650.0001487465
91 2.9999312.999931 0.00021954010.0002195401 2.9999442.999944 0.0002413530.000241353 2.9999562.999956 0.00026131120.0002613112
94 2.9999682.999968 0.00030713030.0003071303 2.9999752.999975 0.00019595020.0001959502 2.9999822.999982 0.00023021580.0002302158
97 2.9999862.999986 0.00014689510.0001468951 2.999992.99999 0.00017259340.0001725934 2.9999922.999992 0.00011013060.0001101306
100 2.9999942.999994 0.00012939950.0001293995 2.9999962.999996 0.000082569520.00008256952 2.9999972.999997 0.000097016630.00009701663
103 2.9999982.999998 0.000061906210.00006190621 2.9999992.999999 0.00011915140.0001191514 33 0.00035704950.0003570495

C.2. Poisson measures

Table C.2 gives νzPoi\nu_{z}^{\rm Poi}. A row (c,w)(c,w) with Im⁡c>0\operatorname{Im}c>0 stands for the two Poisson measures on |q|=r=2/5|q|=r=2/5 with centres cc and c¯\overline{c}, each of mass ww. The row k=0k=0, with cc real, stands for one Poisson measure. The measures are those of the proof of Lemma 4.2, and their logarithmic potential is (4.4). This gives 2⋅83+1=1672\cdot 83+1=167 measures of total mass 329659251979/500000000000329659251979/500000000000.

Table C.2. Poisson centres cc and masses ww: rows k≥1k\geq 1 have Im⁡c>0\operatorname{Im}c>0, in increasing order of arg⁡c\arg c, and stand also for c¯\overline{c}; row k=0k=0 is the real centre.
kk Re⁡c\operatorname{Re}c Im⁡c\operatorname{Im}c ww kk Re⁡c\operatorname{Re}c Im⁡c\operatorname{Im}c ww
0 −0.394-0.394 0 0.0066879680.006687968 42 −0.2046129-0.2046129 0.3413760.341376 0.00026116430.0002611643
1 0.25350360.2535036 0.3088950.308895 0.00027248890.0002724889 43 −0.2080587-0.2080587 0.33458570.3345857 0.0049431390.004943139
2 0.23708830.2370883 0.31967660.3196766 0.0017347680010.001734768001 44 −0.2188947-0.2188947 0.3275990.327599 0.0060914310040.006091431004
3 0.2211170.221117 0.33092490.3309249 0.0031602580.003160258 45 −0.2294962-0.2294962 0.32026160.3202616 0.0049781190.004978119
4 0.20461290.2046129 0.3413760.341376 0.0023556980.002355698 46 −0.2370883-0.2370883 0.31967660.3196766 0.00031722270.0003172227
5 0.1970.197 0.3412140.341214 0.002033160.00203316 47 −0.239852-0.239852 0.31258120.3125812 0.0049537560.004953756
6 0.18761590.1876159 0.35100470.3510047 0.0019455930.001945593 48 −0.249951-0.249951 0.30456610.3045661 0.0062930540050.006293054005
7 0.17426170.1742617 0.35336790.3533679 0.003330030.00333003 49 −0.2597823-0.2597823 0.29622490.2962249 0.004987010.00498701
8 0.16260660.1626066 0.35888030.3588803 0.0034866250.003486625 50 −0.2672805-0.2672805 0.29489850.2948985 0.00034079530.0003407953
9 0.1523080.152308 0.36770410.3677041 0.0023757370.002375737 51 −0.2693354-0.2693354 0.28756640.2875664 0.0050259510.005025951
10 0.13878650.1387865 0.36874690.3687469 0.0038175930.003817593 52 −0.2786001-0.2786001 0.27860010.2786001 0.0063792290020.006379229002
11 0.12664710.1266471 0.37309050.3730905 0.0039425790.003942579 53 −0.2875664-0.2875664 0.26933540.2693354 0.0050746170.005074617
12 0.11553330.1155333 0.38086230.3808623 0.0027756250.002775625 54 −0.2948985-0.2948985 0.26728050.2672805 0.00034515080.0003451508
13 0.10197470.1019747 0.38057480.3805748 0.0041811100020.004181110002 55 −0.2962249-0.2962249 0.25978230.2597823 0.0050685620.005068562
14 0.089468050.08946805 0.38370750.3837075 0.0043311150.004331115 56 −0.3045661-0.3045661 0.2499510.249951 0.0064566530.006456653
15 0.077645950.07764595 0.39035250.3903525 0.0030821570.003082157 57 −0.3125812-0.3125812 0.2398520.239852 0.0051328430.005132843
16 0.064180820.06418082 0.38873750.3887375 0.0045154210.004515421 58 −0.3196766-0.3196766 0.23708830.2370883 0.00032751580.0003275158
17 0.051427320.05142732 0.39062930.3906293 0.0046184040.004618404 59 −0.3202616-0.3202616 0.22949620.2294962 0.005201690.00520169
18 0.039010820.03901082 0.39608350.3960835 0.0033465460.003346546 60 −0.327599-0.327599 0.21889470.2188947 0.0064080250.006408025
19 0.025768830.02576883 0.39315640.3931564 0.0046237230.004623723 61 −0.3345857-0.3345857 0.20805870.2080587 0.0052656050.005265605
20 0.012891320.01289132 0.3937890.393789 0.0053703240.005370324 62 −0.341376-0.341376 0.20461290.2046129 0.00027485670.0002748567
21 0 0.3980.398 0.0029547710.002954771 63 −0.341214-0.341214 0.1970.197 0.0053514030.005351403
22 −0.01289132-0.01289132 0.3937890.393789 0.005585120.00558512 64 −0.347477-0.347477 0.18573030.1857303 0.0063227450010.006322745001
23 −0.02576883-0.02576883 0.39315640.3931564 0.0041476720.004147672 65 −0.3533679-0.3533679 0.17426170.1742617 0.005394970.00539497
24 −0.03861875-0.03861875 0.39210280.3921028 0.0053775010.005377501 66 −0.3597877-0.3597877 0.17016690.1701669 0.00022308950.0002230895
25 −0.05142732-0.05142732 0.39062930.3906293 0.0043642020.004364202 67 −0.3588803-0.3588803 0.16260660.1626066 0.0054940930.005494093
26 −0.05839873-0.05839873 0.39369230.3936923 0.00026812140.0002681214 68 −0.3640085-0.3640085 0.15077730.1507773 0.0062368320.006236832
27 −0.06418082-0.06418082 0.38873750.3887375 0.0044356990.004435699 69 −0.3687469-0.3687469 0.13878650.1387865 0.0055156120.005515612
28 −0.07686559-0.07686559 0.38642940.3864294 0.005498730.00549873 70 −0.3747345-0.3747345 0.13408220.1340822 0.00022525120.0002252512
29 −0.08946805-0.08946805 0.38370750.3837075 0.0045699280.004569928 71 −0.3730905-0.3730905 0.12664710.1266471 0.0054319670.005431967
30 −0.09670611-0.09670611 0.38607240.3860724 0.00023591340.0002359134 72 −0.3770345-0.3770345 0.11437220.1143722 0.0063987250.006398725
31 −0.1019747-0.1019747 0.38057480.3805748 0.0046735230.004673523 73 −0.3805748-0.3805748 0.10197470.1019747 0.0054315840.005431584
32 −0.1143722-0.1143722 0.37703450.3770345 0.0055529040.005552904 74 −0.3860724-0.3860724 0.096706110.09670611 0.00028134610.0002813461
33 −0.1266471-0.1266471 0.37309050.3730905 0.0047833630.004783363 75 −0.3837075-0.3837075 0.089468050.08946805 0.0053618190.005361819
34 −0.1340822-0.1340822 0.37473450.3747345 0.00019763970.0001976397 76 −0.3864294-0.3864294 0.076865590.07686559 0.006560590.00656059
35 −0.1387865-0.1387865 0.36874690.3687469 0.0048919990.004891999 77 −0.3887375-0.3887375 0.064180820.06418082 0.0053414110.005341411
36 −0.1507773-0.1507773 0.36400850.3640085 0.0055996640010.005599664001 78 −0.3936923-0.3936923 0.058398730.05839873 0.0003381350.000338135
37 −0.1626066-0.1626066 0.35888030.3588803 0.004975470.00497547 79 −0.3906293-0.3906293 0.051427320.05142732 0.0052907320.005290732
38 −0.1701669-0.1701669 0.35978770.3597877 0.00020602860.0002060286 80 −0.3921028-0.3921028 0.038618750.03861875 0.006685587760.00668558776
39 −0.1742617-0.1742617 0.35336790.3533679 0.0049268760.004926876 81 −0.3931564-0.3931564 0.025768830.02576883 0.0052718690.005271869
40 −0.1857303-0.1857303 0.3474770.347477 0.0058477200030.005847720003 82 −0.3975206-0.3975206 0.019528930.01952893 0.00035960480.0003596048
41 −0.197-0.197 0.3412140.341214 0.0049847040.004984704 83 −0.393789-0.393789 0.012891320.01289132 0.0052950080.005295008

C.3. Dyadic subdivision

The four supports are

s=x,v:[ε0,1],s=z:[1,3],s=∘:{rei⁢π⁢t:0≤t≤1},s=x,v:\ [\varepsilon_{0},1],\qquad s=z:\ [1,3],\qquad s=\circ:\ \{re^{i\pi t}:% 0\leq t\leq 1\},

the last parametrized by t∈[0,1]t\in[0,1]. The initial pieces of a support are the closed intervals between consecutive points of the following sets, in increasing order:

  • xx:

    ε0\varepsilon_{0}, 11, and the endpoints of the νx\nu_{x}-chain in (ε0,1)(\varepsilon_{0},1);

  • vv:

    ε0\varepsilon_{0}, 11, r=2/5r=2/5, and the endpoints of the νv\nu_{v}-chain in (ε0,1)(\varepsilon_{0},1);

  • zz:

    11, 33, and the endpoints of the νzint\nu_{z}^{\rm int}-chain in (1,3)(1,3);

  • ∘\circ:

    t=k/32t=k/32, 0≤k≤320\leq k\leq 32.

Since the chains start at 0.0842⁢…0.0842\ldots, v0v_{0} and 1.617⁢…1.617\ldots and end at 11, 11 and 33, and rr is not an endpoint of the νv\nu_{v}-chain, there are 132132, 145145, 106106 and 3232 initial pieces.

Lemma C.1.

Let dx=9d_{x}=9, dv=8d_{v}=8, dz=7d_{z}=7, d∘=8d_{\circ}=8. Bisect every initial piece of the support ss to depth dsd_{s}: a piece [A,B][A,B] gives the 2ds2^{d_{s}} leaves

[A+(B−A)⁢(j−1)⁢2−ds,A+(B−A)⁢j⁢2−ds],1≤j≤2ds,[A+(B-A)(j-1)2^{-d_{s}},\,A+(B-A)j2^{-d_{s}}],\qquad 1\leq j\leq 2^{d_{s}},

in qq on the real supports and in tt on the circle. The leaves of each support have rational endpoints, disjoint interiors and union equal to the support. There are 132⋅29132\cdot 2^{9}, 145⋅28145\cdot 2^{8}, 106⋅27106\cdot 2^{7} and 32⋅2832\cdot 2^{8} leaves, 126464126464 in all (Table C.3).

Proof.

Within a piece the leaves are consecutive and their lengths add up to B−AB-A. The pieces of a support are consecutive and cover it. The counts are products. ∎

The leaves are the closed pieces of the proof of Lemma 4.2. On each of them the bound of that proof is below the cap, so no piece needs a finer subdivision.

Table C.3. Uniform bisection depths.
support initial pieces depth dsd_{s} leaves
xx 132132 99 6758467584
vv 145145 88 3712037120
zz real 106106 77 1356813568
∘\circ 3232 88 81928192
total 415415 126464126464

Appendix D Computer checks

The ancillary scripts recheck printed data and run finite tests (Table D). They use exact rational arithmetic and, for the analytic bounds, Arb ball arithmetic [6] through python-flint 0.9.0 under Python 3.12.3.

Table D.1. Computer checks.
check statements checked
determinant the exact seed determinant: (2.6) and Table 2.1. Finite tests: Ci⁢j=3iC_{ij}=3^{i} times the right side of (2.3) with d=j−id=j-i, for 0≤i≤160\leq i\leq 16 and |j−i|≤16|j-i|\leq 16; the four determinant evaluations in Lemma 2.2 and their product for m≤3m\leq 3 and three choices of (s,k,h)(s,k,h).
arithmetic recomputes the arrangement of (3.7) for R=8R=8 in exact rational arithmetic; checks the line families of Table A, every row of Table A.2 (by evaluating 𝔠\mathfrak{c} from (3.2)–(3.3) at two interior points), (3.8), AA in (3.12), 45/3245/32 and −5/48-5/48; rational bounds for τ\tau and α0−τ\alpha_{0}-\tau; integrality of Km⁢GmK_{m}G_{m} for small nn.
analytic Lemmas 4.2 and C.1: the chains, masses, conjugation symmetry and |c|<r|c|<r of Tables C.1 and C.2; Tables B.1, B.2 and C.3, (4.2), (4.3) and α0\alpha_{0}, with the bound of the proof of Lemma 4.2 on each of the 126464126464 leaves.
mod 1717 (5.2), (5.1), and (5.4) for t=1t=1 at W=0,1,2W=0,1,2.

Appendix E Proof of Fact 2

For t>0t>0 let gt⁢(y)=(π⁢t)−1⁢e−|y|2/tg_{t}(y)=(\pi t)^{-1}e^{-|y|^{2}/t} on ℂ\mathbb{C}, a centred Gaussian density. Then gs∗gt=gs+tg_{s}*g_{t}=g_{s+t} and gt⁢(−y)=gt⁢(y)g_{t}(-y)=g_{t}(y). For a,b>0a,b>0, ∫0∞(e−a/t−e−b/t)⁢𝑑t/t=log⁡(b/a)\int_{0}^{\infty}(e^{-a/t}-e^{-b/t})\,dt/t=\log(b/a), and the integrand has constant sign. With a=|y|2a=|y|^{2} and b=1b=1 this gives, for y≠0y\neq 0,

−log⁡|y|=π2⁢∫0∞(gt⁢(y)−gt⁢(1))⁢𝑑t,∫0∞|gt⁢(y)−gt⁢(1)|⁢𝑑t=2π⁢|log⁡|y||.-\log|y|=\frac{\pi}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\bigl{(}g_{t}(y)-g_{t}(1)\bigr{)}\,dt,% \qquad\int_{0}^{\infty}|g_{t}(y)-g_{t}(1)|\,dt=\frac{2}{\pi}\bigl{|}\log|y|% \bigr{|}.

The hypothesis of Fact 2 makes the diagonal |σ|⊗|σ||\sigma|\otimes|\sigma|-null and, by the second identity, gt⁢(u−w)−gt⁢(1)g_{t}(u-w)-g_{t}(1) integrable for |σ|⊗|σ|⊗d⁢t|\sigma|\otimes|\sigma|\otimes dt. By Fubini’s theorem and σ⁢(ℂ)=0\sigma(\mathbb{C})=0 (for each t>0t>0, gtg_{t} is bounded, so ∬gt⁢(1)⁢𝑑σ⁢𝑑σ=gt⁢(1)⁢σ⁢(ℂ)2=0\iint g_{t}(1)\,d\sigma\,d\sigma=g_{t}(1)\sigma(\mathbb{C})^{2}=0),

−∬log⁡|u−w|⁢d⁢σ⁢(u)⁢𝑑σ⁢(w)=π2⁢∫0∞∬gt⁢(u−w)⁢𝑑σ⁢(u)⁢𝑑σ⁢(w)⁢𝑑t.-\iint\log|u-w|\,d\sigma(u)\,d\sigma(w)=\frac{\pi}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\iint g_% {t}(u-w)\,d\sigma(u)\,d\sigma(w)\,dt.

For fixed tt, gt⁢(u−w)=∫gt/2⁢(x−u)⁢gt/2⁢(x−w)⁢𝑑xg_{t}(u-w)=\int g_{t/2}(x-u)g_{t/2}(x-w)\,dx (d⁢xdx the Lebesgue measure on ℂ\mathbb{C}), and the corresponding triple integral against |σ|⊗|σ||\sigma|\otimes|\sigma| is at most |σ|⁢(ℂ)2/(π⁢t)|\sigma|(\mathbb{C})^{2}/(\pi t). So, by Fubini again,

∬gt⁢(u−w)⁢𝑑σ⁢(u)⁢𝑑σ⁢(w)=∫ℂ(∫gt/2⁢(x−u)⁢𝑑σ⁢(u))2⁢𝑑x≥0.\iint g_{t}(u-w)\,d\sigma(u)\,d\sigma(w)=\int_{\mathbb{C}}\Bigl{(}\int g_{t/2}% (x-u)\,d\sigma(u)\Bigr{)}^{2}dx\geq 0.

Hence ∬log⁡|u−w|⁢d⁢σ⁢(u)⁢𝑑σ⁢(w)≤0\iint\log|u-w|\,d\sigma(u)\,d\sigma(w)\leq 0. Compact support is not used.

Use of AI tools

The author devised the method of proof. Codex (OpenAI, GPT-6.1 Sol) computed the reference measure ν\nu and the other printed data, and wrote the Python scripts in anc/. Claude Code (Anthropic, Claude Opus 5.5) checked the scripts, the data and the tables. The author checked every step of the proof, every table and every reference, and takes full responsibility for the content of the paper.

Statements and declarations

Competing interests. The author has no competing interests.

Funding. No funding was received for this work.

Data availability. All data used in the proof are printed in Appendices A–C. The anc/ attachment holds the scripts of Appendix D and a README.md. The entry points are check_determinant.py, check_arith.py, check_analytic.py and check_mod17.py. The helpers are arith.py, caps.py, combine.py, energy.py, indep_caps_params.py, mod17_replay.py, parse_tex.py, refmeasure.py, tex2refjson.py and tex_tables.py. The scripts read the tables and constants from the  source of this manuscript. The analytic replay writes to a temporary directory. The reports in anc/verification/ record the SHA-256 of the  source they checked. The file anc/SCRIPTS_SHA256SUMS lists the SHA-256 of the scripts and the README.md. Its own SHA-256 is

890192149e125730cc0b9b0f85ddd7dab8e9ac391a6d14703849fb74d54f8cd7.

References

  • [1] A. Baker, Transcendental Number Theory, 2nd ed., Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990. MR1074572
  • [2] F. Calegari, V. Dimitrov, and Y. Tang, The linear independence of 11, ζ⁢(2)\zeta(2), and L⁢(2,χ−3)L(2,\chi_{-3}), preprint (2024), arXiv:2408.15403v2.
  • [3] G.-N. Han and C. Krattenthaler, Rectangular Scott-type permanents, Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire 43 (1999), Article B43g, 25 pp., arXiv:math/0003072. MR1741888
  • [4] G. H. Hardy and E. M. Wright, An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 6th ed., revised by D. R. Heath-Brown and J. H. Silverman, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008. MR2445243
  • [5] M. Hata, Rational approximations to the dilogarithm, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 336 (1993), no. 1, 363–387, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1993-1147401-5. MR1147401
  • [6] F. Johansson, Arb: efficient arbitrary-precision midpoint-radius interval arithmetic, IEEE Trans. Comput. 66 (2017), no. 8, 1281–1292, https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2017.2690633. MR3681746
  • [7] C. Krattenthaler, Advanced determinant calculus: a complement, Linear Algebra Appl. 411 (2005), 68–166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2005.06.042. MR2178686
  • [8] NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.8 of 2026-09-15, F. W. J. Olver et al., eds.
  • [9] T. Prellberg, Three irrationality results for the dilogarithm: Rhin–Viola and Viola–Zudilin constructions at −1/4-1/4, 1/51/5, and −1/3-1/3, preprint (2026), arXiv:2609.06895v1.
  • [10] G. Rhin and C. Viola, The permutation group method for the dilogarithm, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 4 (2005), no. 3, 389–437, https://doi.org/10.2422/2036-2145.2005.3.02. MR2185863
  • [11] G. Rhin and C. Viola, Linear independence of 11, Li1\mathrm{Li}_{1} and Li2\mathrm{Li}_{2}, Mosc. J. Comb. Number Theory 8 (2019), no. 1, 81–96, https://doi.org/10.2140/moscow.2019.8.81. MR3864310
  • [12] E. B. Saff and V. Totik, Logarithmic Potentials with External Fields, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 316, 1st ed., Springer, 1997, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03329-6. MR1485778
  • [13] C. Viola and W. Zudilin, Linear independence of dilogarithmic values, J. Reine Angew. Math. 736 (2018), 193–223, https://doi.org/10.1515/crelle-2015-0030; preprint version: Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik Preprint Series 2014 (26), https://archive.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/id/eprint/1914/. MR3769989