Contents

An Aggregate CM-Pair Estimate and a 5/35/3 Bound for Valuation Products of a⁢b⁢cabc Triples

Ruiyi Zhang
(Date: July 2026)
Abstract.

Let a+b=ca+b=c be pairwise coprime positive integers. Then, we introduce R=rad⁡(a⁢b⁢c)R=\operatorname{rad}(abc) and P⁢(a⁢b⁢c)=∏p∣a⁢b⁢cvp⁢(a⁢b⁢c)P(abc)=\prod_{p\mid abc}v_{p}(abc). We present here the proof of

P⁢(a⁢b⁢c),𝐝⁢(a⁢b⁢c)≪εR5/3+ε,P(abc),\ \mathbf{d}(abc)\ll_{\varepsilon}R^{5/3+\varepsilon},

where 𝐝\mathbf{d} is taken to be the divisor function. The first step in the deduction gives an aggregate fixed-radius estimate for CM points on an indefinite Shimura curve. In the case where the CM discriminants lie in [Δ,2⁢Δ][\Delta,2\Delta], the number of nearby ordered pairs is

#⁢{(P,Q)∈𝒫Δ2:d⁢(P,Q)≤r0}≪|𝒫Δ|+Δ⁢(1+Δ2N)⁢Nε,\#\{(P,Q)\in\mathscr{P}_{\Delta}^{2}:d(P,Q)\leq r_{0}\}\ll|\mathscr{P}_{\Delta% }|+\Delta\left(1+\frac{\Delta^{2}}{N}\right)N^{\varepsilon},

which holds uniformly in all polynomial ranges Δ≤NA\Delta\leq N^{A}. This is established by an elementary local orbit count in the Bruhat–Tits tree, using the characteristic-matrix framework of Bruinier, Li and Möller. The spatial Cauchy–Schwarz then yields a bound for the first absolute moment of the CM-packet. The ordinary AM–GM now applies directly to the logarithmic average in Pasten’s Arakelov estimate to complete the argument, and neither a fourth moment nor a pointwise subconvexity estimate is required.

Key words and phrases:
abc triples, Shimura curves, CM points, quaternion orders, valuations
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 11G18; Secondary 11G05, 11D75, 11R29
Independent Researcher, Columbia, Maryland, USA. Email: ryzfsu@gmail.com.

1. Introduction

Let a,b,ca,b,c be pairwise coprime positive integers satisfying a+b=ca+b=c. Here

R=rad⁡(a⁢b⁢c),P⁢(a⁢b⁢c)=∏p∣a⁢b⁢cvp⁢(a⁢b⁢c),𝐝⁢(n)=∏p∣n(vp⁢(n)+1).R=\operatorname{rad}(abc),\qquad P(abc)=\prod_{p\mid abc}v_{p}(abc),\qquad% \mathbf{d}(n)=\prod_{p\mid n}\bigl{(}v_{p}(n)+1\bigr{)}.

Using a comparison between classical and quaternionic modular degrees, Pasten was able to derive the unconditional bounds P⁢(a⁢b⁢c),𝐝⁢(a⁢b⁢c)≪εR8/3+εP(abc),\mathbf{d}(abc)\ll_{\varepsilon}R^{8/3+\varepsilon} by evaluating an integral differential at CM points [12, Theorem 1.11 and Theorem 16.8]. Our main result is a reduction of the exponent.

Rickards has established precise formulas regarding the intersections of closed geodesics associated with pairs of real quadratic embeddings. These formulas include xx-linking and local Eichler-order information [15, Theorems 10 and 63]. More recently, Bruinier–Li–Möller considered all signatures of a pair of quadratic vectors. More specifically, their formula gives the number of pairs of Heegner points at a given distance, and this number is a product of local factors [3, Theorem 1.1(iv) and Corollary 5.9]. We use Bruinier–Li–Möller’s characteristic-matrix and distance formalism, but prove the coarse orbit bound needed here directly from the local structure of quaternion orders and the Bruhat–Tits tree [16, Equation (23.2.4), Theorem 13.3.11, and Sections 23.5.11–23.5.16]. The aggregate estimate provides us with the divisor-sum bound we need for Pasten’s argument.

In the context of the theory of special cycles, Heegner points, and quaternionic Shimura varieties, the natural objects in that framework are CM points [8, 20, 19, 18]. Complete or structured packets satisfy the equidistribution, variance, and small-scale bounds [10, 5, 7, 9, 1, 6, 17]. None of these works states our fixed-radius bound for arbitrary selected submultisets. Our approach is to substitute the classical sup-norm techniques [2, 4] with a local L1L^{1} inequality. Later abc work treats different functionals or additional size hypotheses [13].

Theorem 1.1.

For every ε>0\varepsilon>0 and for every pairwise coprime triple of positive integers a+b=ca+b=c, we have

P(abc),𝐝(abc)≪εrad(abc)5/3+ε.P(abc),\ \mathbf{d}(abc)\ll_{\varepsilon}\operatorname{rad}(abc)^{5/3+% \varepsilon}.

Geometrically speaking, let RNR_{N} stand for an Eichler order of reduced discriminant NN in an indefinite quaternion division algebra, putting XN=RN1\ℌX_{N}=R_{N}^{1}\backslash\mathfrak{H}. We assume that the odd part of NN is square-free, and that v2⁢(N)≤8v_{2}(N)\leq 8. For odd fundamental discriminants, −d-d being coprime to NN, and d∈[Δ,2⁢Δ]d\in[\Delta,2\Delta], choose 𝒫Δ\mathscr{P}_{\Delta} as any multiset of the related CM centers where the multiplicity of each one does not exceed a fixed B0≥1B_{0}\geq 1.

Theorem 1.2 (Aggregate CM-pair estimate).

Fix A,r0>0A,r_{0}>0 and B0≥1B_{0}\geq 1. If Δ≤NA\Delta\leq N^{A} and every multiplicity in 𝒫Δ\mathscr{P}_{\Delta} is at most B0B_{0}, then

#⁢{(P,Q)∈𝒫Δ2:d⁢(P,Q)≤r0}≪A,r0,B0,ε|𝒫Δ|+Δ⁢(1+Δ2N)⁢Nε.\#\{(P,Q)\in\mathscr{P}_{\Delta}^{2}:d(P,Q)\leq r_{0}\}\ll_{A,r_{0},B_{0},% \varepsilon}|\mathscr{P}_{\Delta}|+\Delta\left(1+\frac{\Delta^{2}}{N}\right)N^% {\varepsilon}.

The estimate is uniform both in the chosen discriminant submultiset and in the admissible factorization N=D⁢MN=DM.

For pairs lying on the off-diagonal, we will set −d,−e-d,-e to be the discriminants and bb to be the integral pairing parameter. The local conditions state that the odd part of NN has to divide b2−d⁢eb^{2}-de. A direct local orbit count gives an upper bound of NεN^{\varepsilon} for each global orbit count. After we have fixed the radius we will be down to Or0⁢(Δ⁢(1+Δ2/N))O_{r_{0}}(\Delta(1+\Delta^{2}/N)) choices for bb and the quotient. These choices fix d⁢ede, and d⁢ede can have at most NεN^{\varepsilon} admissible factorizations. Further, the thinning of the packets considered here will only eliminate pairs.

In the case of 𝒫\mathscr{P}, that is, the corresponding full Galois CM multiset from Pasten’s construction, we use x=N2/3+δx=N^{2/3+\delta} and ϑ=δ/5\vartheta=\delta/5. Then, using theorem 1.2, the local holomorphic L1L^{1} inequality, and the spatial form of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, we obtain

1H⁢∑d12⁢hd⁢∑P∈𝒞d|FN⁢(P)|≪Nτ+ε,τ=(23+δ)⁢6⁢δ5.\frac{1}{H}\sum_{d}\frac{1}{2h_{d}}\sum_{P\in\mathscr{C}_{d}}|F_{N}(P)|\ll N^{% \tau+\varepsilon},\qquad\tau=\left(\frac{2}{3}+\delta\right)\frac{6\delta}{5}.

Here ‖FN‖L2⁢(μprob)=No⁢(1)\|F_{N}\|_{L^{2}(\mu_{\mathrm{prob}})}=N^{o(1)}. Applying zero-counting and Markov’s inequality at this point, we obtain a full packet that is free of zeros, on which the first absolute moment is ≪Nτ+ε\ll N^{\tau+\varepsilon}. We write uσ=|f⁢(τσ)|⁢Im⁡τσ>0u_{\sigma}=|f(\tau_{\sigma})|\operatorname{Im}\tau_{\sigma}>0, and for these we need only AM–GM:

12⁢hd⁢∑σlog⁡uσ≤log⁡(12⁢hd⁢∑σuσ).\frac{1}{2h_{d}}\sum_{\sigma}\log u_{\sigma}\leq\log\left(\frac{1}{2h_{d}}\sum% _{\sigma}u_{\sigma}\right).

Using these first moment and AM–GM bounds along with Pasten’s Proposition 14.2, height formula, and modular-degree comparison gives the cell exponent qδ=5/3+13⁢δ/5+12⁢δ2/5q_{\delta}=5/3+13\delta/5+12\delta^{2}/5. In place of Pasten’s norm exponent value of 5/65/6, we can put the value 1/3+o⁢(1)1/3+o(1) that our aggregate first-moment estimate gives us. With that replacement, 1+2⁢(5/6)=8/31+2(5/6)=8/3 changes to 1+2⁢(1/3)=5/31+2(1/3)=5/3. Finally, the cyclic pairs and triples will distribute the level factors that are left, and we let δ→0\delta\to 0 to obtain the proof of theorem 1.1.

2. Quaternionic CM packets

Let BB represent an indefinite quaternion division algebra over ℚ\mathbb{Q}, and let RNR_{N} denote an Eichler order of reduced discriminant N=D⁢MN=DM, where DD is the discriminant of BB and MM the Eichler level. As in Pasten, a factorization N=D⁢MN=DM is called admissible when (D,M)=1(D,M)=1 and DD is the product of an even number of distinct primes; in the compact case considered below, D>1D>1. We assume that the odd part of NN is square-free and that v2⁢(N)≤8v_{2}(N)\leq 8. Write

ΓN=RN1/{±1},XN=ΓN\ℌ.\Gamma_{N}=R_{N}^{1}/\{\pm 1\},\qquad X_{N}=\Gamma_{N}\backslash\mathfrak{H}.

In this notation we write d⁢μphys=d⁢x⁢d⁢y/y2d\mu_{\mathrm{phys}}=dx\,dy/y^{2} for the hyperbolic measure in the physical sense, we let μprob\mu_{\mathrm{prob}} be the probability measure, and we set VN=vol⁡(XN)V_{N}=\operatorname{vol}(X_{N}). Using the exact volume formula from [3, Equation (2.7)], we get, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0,

N1−ε≪εVN≪εN1+ε.N^{1-\varepsilon}\ll_{\varepsilon}V_{N}\ll_{\varepsilon}N^{1+\varepsilon}.

As for the Gross lattice, we can write it out in the following form

LN={2⁢a−trd⁡(a):a∈RN}⊂B0.L_{N}=\{2a-\operatorname{trd}(a):a\in R_{N}\}\subset B^{0}.

In what follows we adopt the source convention Q=−nrdQ=-\operatorname{nrd} on the trace-zero space, with its full polarization

BQ⁢(x,y)=Q⁢(x+y)−Q⁢(x)−Q⁢(y)B_{Q}(x,y)=Q(x+y)-Q(x)-Q(y)

on the same space, so that BQ⁢(x,y)=trd⁡(x⁢y)B_{Q}(x,y)=\operatorname{trd}(xy). We note that the primitive vectors representing imaginary quadratic discriminant −d-d satisfy Q⁢(x)=−d<0Q(x)=-d<0. Taking lifts and signs for the associated negative lines, we read off the relation

|BQ⁢(x,y)|2⁢Q⁢(x)⁢Q⁢(y)=cosh⁡d⁢(x,y).\frac{|B_{Q}(x,y)|}{2\sqrt{Q(x)Q(y)}}=\cosh d(x,y).

In fact, if we divide xx and yy by the square roots of −Q⁢(x)-Q(x) and −Q⁢(y)-Q(y), we recognize the standard distance equation for the negative sheet of the hyperboloid model, the 22 being the contribution of the full polarization.

Lemma 2.1 (Lattice and characteristic-matrix normalization).

The lattice LNL_{N} is exactly the index-four lattice LL that we find in [3, Equation (2.9)]. An optimal embedding of the imaginary quadratic maximal order of odd fundamental discriminant −d-d determines, up to sign, a primitive x∈LNx\in L_{N} with Q⁢(x)=−dQ(x)=-d, and the converse holds as well. For a pair x,yx,y, the characteristic matrix in the notation of Bruinier–Li–Möller is

T=12⁢(BQ⁢(xi,xj))i,j=(−dbb−e),b=12⁢BQ⁢(x,y).T=\frac{1}{2}\bigl{(}B_{Q}(x_{i},x_{j})\bigr{)}_{i,j}=\begin{pmatrix}-d&b\\ b&-e\end{pmatrix},\qquad b=\frac{1}{2}B_{Q}(x,y).
Proof.

If a∈RNa\in R_{N}, we can check that either 2⁢a−trd⁡(a)2a-\operatorname{trd}(a) lies in 2⁢(RN∩B0)2(R_{N}\cap B^{0}) or (1+2⁢a−trd⁡(a))/2∈RN(1+2a-\operatorname{trd}(a))/2\in R_{N}, according to the parity of trd⁡(a)\operatorname{trd}(a). In both cases the converse holds as well, and we obtain the equality with the lattice in [3, Equation (2.9)]. Let us assume now that x∈LNx\in L_{N} and Q⁢(x)=−dQ(x)=-d, with −d-d being an odd fundamental discriminant. Then xx cannot belong to 2⁢(RN∩B0)2(R_{N}\cap B^{0}), therefore α=(1+x)/2∈RN\alpha=(1+x)/2\in R_{N}. Since

α2−α+d+14=0,\alpha^{2}-\alpha+\frac{d+1}{4}=0,

α\alpha defines an embedding of the maximal order ℤ⁢[(1+−d)/2]\mathbb{Z}[(1+\sqrt{-d})/2] into RNR_{N}, and this embedding is optimal since the source order is maximal. Conversely, an optimal embedding φ\varphi sends −d\sqrt{-d} to the vector x=φ⁢(−d)∈LNx=\varphi(\sqrt{-d})\in L_{N} with Q⁢(x)=x2=−dQ(x)=x^{2}=-d. This vector is primitive. Indeed, Q⁢(LN)⊂ℤQ(L_{N})\subset\mathbb{Z} because Q(2a−trd(a))=trd(a)2−4nrd(a)Q(2a-\operatorname{trd}(a))=\operatorname{trd}(a)^{2}-4\operatorname{nrd}(a) for a∈RNa\in R_{N}, and hence a factorization x=k⁢x0x=kx_{0} in LNL_{N}, with k>1k>1, would force k2∣dk^{2}\mid d, contrary to the square-freeness of dd. This proves the stated correspondence, and it also proves the normalization in the characteristic matrix 12⁢(BQ⁢(xi,xj))\frac{1}{2}(B_{Q}(x_{i},x_{j})). In addition, let us state the values x=2⁢α−1x=2\alpha-1 and y=2⁢β−1y=2\beta-1, where α,β∈RN\alpha,\beta\in R_{N} both have the reduced trace value of one. Then

BQ⁢(x,y)=4⁢trd⁡(α⁢β)−2,b=2⁢trd⁡(α⁢β)−1∈ℤ,B_{Q}(x,y)=4\operatorname{trd}(\alpha\beta)-2,\qquad b=2\operatorname{trd}(% \alpha\beta)-1\in\mathbb{Z},

so bb is odd. This direct calculation fixes the normalization that we will use below, and we can check that its off-diagonal entry agrees with [3, Equation (2.14)]. ∎

In what follows, we will take CM discriminants to be coprime to NN and to lie in [Δ,2⁢Δ][\Delta,2\Delta].

Remark 2.2.

In the following, we will write hdh_{d} for the class number of ℚ⁢(−d)\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-d}), while 𝒞d\mathscr{C}_{d} will denote the complete 2⁢hd2h_{d}-element Galois multiset of Pasten, and not a selected orientation packet. Moreover, we can use the fact that the CM point of Pasten has a residue field equal to the Hilbert class field [12, Section 13.1], which ensures that these 2⁢hd2h_{d} conjugates are distinct quotient points. Each of the elements is a CM center of discriminant −d-d, and hence we can see that it has the primitive-vector realization in lemma 2.1. Since the pair estimate is uniform for submultisets, we do not need to identify this Galois multiset with one prescribed system of local orientations. As for standard optimal-embedding counts with a fixed local class, we can find such counts stated in [11, Theorem 2.5].

Remark 2.3.

For nonsingular TT, we can recall that Bruinier–Li–Möller identify RTR_{T} with the diagonal norm-one orbit set of ordered pairs in LN2L_{N}^{2} that have characteristic matrix TT. See their definition of RTR_{T} together with [3, Equation (2.9)]. The paragraph preceding their Theorem 5.7 explicitly states that the lattice in use for their subsequent local computations is reset to the localization of this same index-four lattice. Their count allows for the inclusion of imprimitive pairs while the CM centers are derived from primitive vectors, so we can see that the latter classes form a subset. The bound for the entire orbit set below is obtained from a direct local coset count and does not use an exact local-density formula. Indeed, a CM center determines its negative rational line, on which a primitive vector of norm −d-d is unique up to sign, since any two such vectors differ by a rational scalar with square equal to one. In moving to the quotient, at most an elliptic stabilizer can be added, and by the integral-trace argument in the proof of lemma 4.1, the projective order of that stabilizer is bounded by 33. Thus the fibers of the map from primitive-vector classes to CM centers are uniformly bounded, and the bounded multiplicities in 𝒫Δ\mathscr{P}_{\Delta} will be absorbed in the implied constant.

3. The aggregate CM-pair estimate

We prove theorem 1.2.

Lemma 3.1 (Primitive local-factor bound).

Let

T=(−dbb−e),N♭=N/2v2⁢(N),T=\begin{pmatrix}-d&b\\ b&-e\end{pmatrix},\qquad N^{\flat}=N/2^{v_{2}(N)},

where −d,−e-d,-e are odd fundamental discriminants, (d⁢e,N)=1(de,N)=1, bb is odd, and TT is nonsingular. Assume that the odd part of NN is square-free and v2⁢(N)≤8v_{2}(N)\leq 8. We let RT⁢(D,M)R_{T}(D,M) denote the complete set of all norm-one equivalence classes with characteristic matrix TT, for the order of discriminant DD and level MM. When the order is clear we write RTR_{T} for that set. If RTR_{T} is nonempty, then

N♭∣b2−d⁢e.N^{\flat}\mid b^{2}-de. (1)

Moreover, uniformly for d,e≍Δd,e\asymp\Delta, |b|≪r0Δ|b|\ll_{r_{0}}\Delta, and Δ≤NA\Delta\leq N^{A},

|RT|≪A,r0,εNε.|R_{T}|\ll_{A,r_{0},\varepsilon}N^{\varepsilon}. (2)
Proof.

Write M=2k⁢M0M=2^{k}M_{0} with M0M_{0} odd. For k>0k>0, let RD⁢M0R_{DM_{0}} be the Eichler overorder of RNR_{N} of level M0M_{0}; admissibility gives 2∤D2\nmid D. Then

LN⊂LD⁢M0,ΓN⊂ΓD⁢M0.L_{N}\subset L_{DM_{0}},\qquad\Gamma_{N}\subset\Gamma_{DM_{0}}.

Thus every ΓD⁢M0\Gamma_{DM_{0}}-orbit splits into at most [ΓD⁢M0:ΓN][\Gamma_{DM_{0}}:\Gamma_{N}] many orbits of ΓN\Gamma_{N}. The local Eichler index, equivalently the quotient of the exact volume formulas in [3, Equation (2.7)], is

|RT(D,M)|≤[ΓD⁢M0:ΓN]|RT(D,M0)|,[ΓD⁢M0:ΓN]=3⋅2k−1≤384.|R_{T}(D,M)|\leq[\Gamma_{DM_{0}}:\Gamma_{N}]|R_{T}(D,M_{0})|,\qquad[\Gamma_{DM% _{0}}:\Gamma_{N}]=3\cdot 2^{k-1}\leq 384. (3)

It remains to treat the odd-level order. Put N0=D⁢M0N_{0}=DM_{0}, R=RN0R=R_{N_{0}}, L=L⁢(R)L=L(R), and Γ=R1/{±1}\Gamma=R^{1}/\{\pm 1\} for the rest of this proof. Notice that the odd part of N0N_{0} is N♭N^{\flat}.

Put G=SO⁡(B0)≃B×/ℚ×G=\operatorname{SO}(B^{0})\simeq B^{\times}/\mathbb{Q}^{\times}. Fix a rational pair X0=(x0,y0)X_{0}=(x_{0},y_{0}) with Gram matrix TT, and, for each finite prime pp, write

𝒦p\displaystyle\mathcal{K}_{p} =im⁡(Rp×⟶G⁢(ℚp)),\displaystyle=\operatorname{im}(R_{p}^{\times}\longrightarrow G(\mathbb{Q}_{p}% )),
Sp⁢(T)\displaystyle S_{p}(T) ={g⁢𝒦p:g−1⁢X0∈Lp2},\displaystyle=\{g\mathcal{K}_{p}:g^{-1}X_{0}\in L_{p}^{2}\},
cp⁢(T)\displaystyle c_{p}(T) =#⁢Sp⁢(T).\displaystyle=\#S_{p}(T).

The action of G⁢(F)G(F) on ordered pairs of Gram matrix TT is simply transitive for F=ℚF=\mathbb{Q} and F=ℚpF=\mathbb{Q}_{p}. Indeed, an isometry between the two nondegenerate planes extends by Witt’s theorem, its determinant can be corrected on the orthogonal line, and an element of G⁢(F)G(F) fixing the pair also fixes that line because it has determinant one. The orbit map is a homeomorphism: its inverse is obtained by completing (x,y)(x,y) with their cross-product vector, and its only denominator is a fixed nonzero multiple of detT\det T. Hence the inverse image of the closed integral Gram fiber in the compact set Lp2L_{p}^{2} is compact. Since 𝒦p\mathcal{K}_{p} is open, every Sp⁢(T)S_{p}(T) is finite.

We next record the global-to-local injection. If 𝒦=∏p𝒦p\mathcal{K}=\prod_{p}\mathcal{K}_{p}, then

G⁢(ℚ)∩𝒦=im⁡(R×).G(\mathbb{Q})\cap\mathcal{K}=\operatorname{im}(R^{\times}). (4)

To see this, represent a class in the intersection by q∈B×⁢(ℚ)q\in B^{\times}(\mathbb{Q}) and write q=λp⁢upq=\lambda_{p}u_{p} locally, with λp∈ℚp×\lambda_{p}\in\mathbb{Q}_{p}^{\times} and up∈Rp×u_{p}\in R_{p}^{\times}. Since vp⁢(nrd⁡q)=2⁢vp⁢(λp)v_{p}(\operatorname{nrd}q)=2v_{p}(\lambda_{p}), multiplication by the rational number having valuation −vp⁢(λp)-v_{p}(\lambda_{p}) at every pp gives an element, and its inverse, in every RpR_{p}. The identity R=B⁢(ℚ)∩∏pRpR=B(\mathbb{Q})\cap\prod_{p}R_{p} proves (4). Simple transitivity now maps full-unit global orbits injectively into the restricted product ∏pSp⁢(T)\prod_{p}S_{p}(T). Passing from full units to norm-one units costs an index at most two, and hence

|RT⁢(D,M0)|≤2⁢∏pcp⁢(T).|R_{T}(D,M_{0})|\leq 2\prod_{p}c_{p}(T). (5)

We count the local cosets directly. At an odd prime, Lp=Rp0L_{p}=R_{p}^{0}. If BpB_{p} is split and RpR_{p} is maximal, then G⁢(ℚp)/𝒦pG(\mathbb{Q}_{p})/\mathcal{K}_{p} is the vertex set of the Bruhat–Tits tree. An integral change in the two pair coordinates puts the first elementary divisor first. If it is a unit, choose the first vector xx with Q⁢(x)=ϵ∈ℤp×Q(x)=\epsilon\in\mathbb{Z}_{p}^{\times}. When ϵ\epsilon is nonsquare, ℤp⁢[x]\mathbb{Z}_{p}[x] is the maximal unramified quadratic order and its stable lattices give at most one homothety class. When ϵ=s2\epsilon=s^{2}, the integral idempotents put

x=(s00−s),y=(0ru0).x=\begin{pmatrix}s&0\\ 0&-s\end{pmatrix},\qquad y=\begin{pmatrix}0&r\\ u&0\end{pmatrix}.

The xx-stable lattices are Λn=ℤp⁢e1⊕pn⁢ℤp⁢e2\Lambda_{n}=\mathbb{Z}_{p}e_{1}\oplus p^{n}\mathbb{Z}_{p}e_{2}, and yy stabilizes Λn\Lambda_{n} exactly for

−vp⁢(r)≤n≤vp⁢(u).-v_{p}(r)\leq n\leq v_{p}(u).

As vp⁢(r⁢u)=t:=vp⁢(detT)v_{p}(ru)=t:=v_{p}(\det T), this gives at most t+1t+1 vertices. If the first elementary divisor is pp, square-freeness of d,ed,e allows us to choose Q⁢(x)=p⁢ϵQ(x)=p\epsilon. The order ℤp⁢[x]\mathbb{Z}_{p}[x] is then the maximal order of a ramified quadratic field. Its fractional ideals, modulo central homothety, have two parity classes, so cp⁢(T)≤2c_{p}(T)\leq 2; here t≥2t\geq 2.

If pp is an odd division prime, the unique maximal order and its Gross lattice are invariant under conjugation, while

Bp×/(ℚp×⁢Rp×)≃ℤ/2⁢ℤ.B_{p}^{\times}/(\mathbb{Q}_{p}^{\times}R_{p}^{\times})\simeq\mathbb{Z}/2% \mathbb{Z}.

Thus a nonempty support has cp⁢(T)=2c_{p}(T)=2. Reduction of Rp0R_{p}^{0} modulo the radical is one-dimensional, so such a represented pair has p∣detTp\mid\det T. Finally, when p∣M0p\mid M_{0}, the group 𝒦p\mathcal{K}_{p} fixes an oriented edge. Since (d⁢e,N)=1(de,N)=1, the maximal-order support is either one vertex or an interval of t+1t+1 vertices as above. The former gives no edge, and the latter gives 2⁢t2t oriented edges. Hence

cp⁢(T)≤{t+1,p∤D⁢M0, unit first divisor,2,p∤D⁢M0, first divisor ⁢p,2,p∣D,2⁢t,p∣M0.c_{p}(T)\leq\begin{cases}t+1,&p\nmid DM_{0},\text{ unit first divisor},\\ 2,&p\nmid DM_{0},\text{ first divisor }p,\\ 2,&p\mid D,\\ 2t,&p\mid M_{0}.\end{cases} (6)

These tree and order identifications are standard; see [16, Equation (23.2.4), Theorem 13.3.11, Lemma 23.5.15, and Sections 23.5.11–23.5.16].

It remains to count at 22. Since −d,−e-d,-e are odd fundamental discriminants and bb is odd, d≡e≡3(mod4)d\equiv e\equiv 3\pmod{4} and t=v2⁢(detT)≥2t=v_{2}(\det T)\geq 2. An integral shear gives

T∼diag⁡(ϵ1,2t⁢ϵ2),ϵ1≡1⁢or⁢ 5(mod8).T\sim\operatorname{diag}(\epsilon_{1},2^{t}\epsilon_{2}),\qquad\epsilon_{1}% \equiv 1\ \hbox{or}\ 5\pmod{8}.

In the split algebra the Gross lattice of the standard maximal order is

L2={(z2⁢v2⁢u−z):z,u,v∈ℤ2},Q=z2+4⁢u⁢v.L_{2}=\left\{\begin{pmatrix}z&2v\\ 2u&-z\end{pmatrix}:z,u,v\in\mathbb{Z}_{2}\right\},\qquad Q=z^{2}+4uv.

For a unit-norm first vector xx, membership in the Gross lattice of a maximal order O′O^{\prime} is equivalent to (1+x)/2∈O′(1+x)/2\in O^{\prime}. Indeed, writing x=2⁢a−trd⁡(a)x=2a-\operatorname{trd}(a), the oddness of Q(x)=trd(a)2−4nrd(a)Q(x)=\operatorname{trd}(a)^{2}-4\operatorname{nrd}(a) forces trd⁡(a)\operatorname{trd}(a) to be odd; the converse follows from trace one. If ϵ1≡5(mod8)\epsilon_{1}\equiv 5\pmod{8}, this element generates the unramified maximal quadratic order, whose stable lattices form one homothety class. If ϵ1≡1(mod8)\epsilon_{1}\equiv 1\pmod{8}, scale by a unit and take x=diag⁡(1,−1)x=\operatorname{diag}(1,-1). The integral idempotent (1+x)/2(1+x)/2 forces every stable lattice to split along the two eigenlines. Writing y=(0ru0)y=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}0&r\\ u&0\end{smallmatrix}\right), the initial Gross integrality gives r,u∈2⁢ℤ2r,u\in 2\mathbb{Z}_{2}, while Q⁢(y)=r⁢u=2t⁢ϵ2Q(y)=ru=2^{t}\epsilon_{2}. Gross integrality at Λn\Lambda_{n} is equivalent to

1−v2⁢(r)≤n≤v2⁢(u)−1,1-v_{2}(r)\leq n\leq v_{2}(u)-1,

which gives at most t−1t-1 vertices. In the dyadic division algebra the unique maximal order is again invariant under conjugation and the projective unit quotient has order two. Consequently

c2⁢(T)\displaystyle c_{2}(T) ≤1\displaystyle\leq 1 (ϵ1≡5mod8),\displaystyle(\epsilon_{1}\equiv 5\bmod 8), (7)
c2⁢(T)\displaystyle c_{2}(T) ≤t−1\displaystyle\leq t-1 (ϵ1≡1mod8),\displaystyle(\epsilon_{1}\equiv 1\bmod 8),
c2⁢(T)\displaystyle c_{2}(T) =2\displaystyle=2 (2∣D).\displaystyle(2\mid D).

Every nontrivial local factor is therefore attached to a prime divisor of detT\det T and, in every branch of (6)–(7),

cp⁢(T)≤(vp⁢(detT)+1)2.c_{p}(T)\leq\bigl{(}v_{p}(\det T)+1\bigr{)}^{2}.

At an odd prime dividing D⁢M0DM_{0}, the same rank-one reductions used above also give p∣detTp\mid\det T, proving N♭∣b2−d⁢eN^{\flat}\mid b^{2}-de. Thus

|RT⁢(D,M0)|≤2⁢∏p∣detT(vp⁢(detT)+1)2=2⁢𝐝⁢(|detT|)2.|R_{T}(D,M_{0})|\leq 2\prod_{p\mid\det T}\bigl{(}v_{p}(\det T)+1\bigr{)}^{2}=2% \mathbf{d}(|\det T|)^{2}.

Together with (3), the bounds |detT|≪r0Δ2|\det T|\ll_{r_{0}}\Delta^{2} and Δ≤NA\Delta\leq N^{A}, and the standard divisor bound, this proves (2), uniformly in the admissible factorization. ∎

Proof of theorem 1.2.

For each ordered pair of quotient centers, we will need to choose lifts that realize the respective quotient distance after shifting one of the two by a member of ΓN\Gamma_{N}. In turn, we see that the corresponding simultaneous ΓN\Gamma_{N}-class of primitive vectors is counted by the appropriate RTR_{T}. By lemma 2.1, we see that its characteristic matrix is

T=(−dbb−e).T=\begin{pmatrix}-d&b\\ b&-e\end{pmatrix}.

We need to select signs for the two primitive vectors independently in such a way that b>0b>0. Then, from the hyperboloid calculation preceding lemma 2.1, we can read off cosh⁡d⁢(P,Q)=b/d⁢e\cosh d(P,Q)=b/\sqrt{de}. Also, we can switch either sign, replacing bb by −b-b, but the CM center remains unchanged. Then we will find that the sign-invariant form is

cosh⁡d⁢(P,Q)=|b|d⁢e.\cosh d(P,Q)=\frac{|b|}{\sqrt{de}}. (8)

We let RTR_{T} denote the complete set of norm-one equivalence classes with characteristic matrix TT, and we write N♭=N/2v2⁢(N)N^{\flat}=N/2^{v_{2}(N)}. We will treat the singular and the nonsingular cases separately.

If TT is singular, then we can see that (8) gives distance zero. Since d,ed,e are both fundamental, we see that b2=d⁢eb^{2}=de also gives d=ed=e. Hence we can conclude that the corresponding quotient centers agree. With m⁢(P)m(P) the multiplicity of a center, we can read off from the bounded multiplicity that ∑Pm⁢(P)2≤B0⁢∑Pm⁢(P)=B0⁢|𝒫Δ|\sum_{P}m(P)^{2}\leq B_{0}\sum_{P}m(P)=B_{0}|\mathscr{P}_{\Delta}|. Together with the bounded fibres in remark 2.3, we see that this bound provides a contribution given by OB0⁢(|𝒫Δ|)O_{B_{0}}(|\mathscr{P}_{\Delta}|). For a nonsingular pair we will need lemma 3.1. If the pair is at distance at most r0r_{0}, then we see that (8) gives Or0⁢(Δ)O_{r_{0}}(\Delta) possibilities for bb. We can now put

m=b2−d⁢eN♭.m=\frac{b^{2}-de}{N^{\flat}}.

The form Q=−nrdQ=-\operatorname{nrd} has signature (2,1)(2,1). The reverse Cauchy–Schwarz inequality on its negative cone gives

BQ⁢(x,y)2≥4⁢Q⁢(x)⁢Q⁢(y)=4⁢d⁢e,B_{Q}(x,y)^{2}\geq 4Q(x)Q(y)=4de,

with equality only when xx and yy are proportional. Since b=BQ⁢(x,y)/2b=B_{Q}(x,y)/2 and TT is nonsingular, the inequality is strict here; therefore b2−d⁢e>0b^{2}-de>0. Together with (1), this shows that mm is a positive integer. Since the standing hypothesis gives N/N♭≤28N/N^{\flat}\leq 2^{8}, Equations (8) and (1) give

1≤m≪r01+Δ2N.1\leq m\ll_{r_{0}}1+\frac{\Delta^{2}}{N}.

For fixed bb and mm, we see that the product d⁢e=b2−N♭⁢mde=b^{2}-N^{\flat}m is fixed as well. Then we can bound the number of ordered factor pairs d,e∈[Δ,2⁢Δ]d,e\in[\Delta,2\Delta] by its divisor function value. That divisor function value is NεN^{\varepsilon} throughout the polynomial range. The conditions on fundamental discriminants and coprimality thin this set of pairs, but as we can see they add nothing. The summation of (2) over bb and mm therefore leads us to

≪A,r0,εΔ⁢(1+Δ2N)⁢Nε\ll_{A,r_{0},\varepsilon}\Delta\left(1+\frac{\Delta^{2}}{N}\right)N^{\varepsilon}

off the diagonal. Restricting to submultisets removes pairs and does nothing else, apart from the bounded multiplicities that were already controlled. This proves the theorem. ∎

4. A first absolute CM-packet moment

We now place theorem 1.2 in Pasten’s family. For an abc triple, let NN be the conductor of the Frey curve attached to that triple, and choose an admissible factorization N=D⁢MN=DM. Let 0<δ<1/100<\delta<1/10 be a parameter to be fixed at the end. For this Frey curve, Pasten records

N=2r⁢∏p∣a⁢b⁢cp>2p,0≤r≤8;N=2^{r}\prod_{\begin{subarray}{c}p\mid abc\\ p>2\end{subarray}}p,\qquad 0\leq r\leq 8;

at every odd prime p∣a⁢b⁢cp\mid abc one has vp⁢(N)=1v_{p}(N)=1 [12, Section 3 and proof of Theorem 16.8]. Thus the odd part of NN is square-free and the hypotheses of section 2 hold for every admissible factorization used below. Pasten’s sieve [12, Theorem 11.1 and Corollary 11.2], along with

x=N2/3+δ,ϑ=δ/5,x=N^{2/3+\delta},\qquad\vartheta=\delta/5, (9)

produces HH odd fundamental discriminants −d-d, with x<d≤2⁢xx<d\leq 2x, in which all the primes dividing DD are inert while all the primes dividing MM are split in ℚ⁢(−d)\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-d}), and

H≫x1−δ,d1/2−ϑ<hd≪εx1/2+ε,L′L⁢(1,χd)≪log⁡log⁡d.H\gg x^{1-\delta},\qquad d^{1/2-\vartheta}<h_{d}\ll_{\varepsilon}x^{1/2+% \varepsilon},\qquad\frac{L^{\prime}}{L}(1,\chi_{d})\ll\log\log d. (10)

In particular, all these discriminants are coprime to NN. In this situation we can apply the corollary that we cited, because x=N2/3+δ>N1/2+δx=N^{2/3+\delta}>N^{1/2+\delta}, and we can note that its constants are uniform in the admissible factorization N=D⁢MN=DM. Let 𝒞d\mathscr{C}_{d} be the full 2⁢hd2h_{d}-element Galois multiset in remark 2.2, and set

𝒫=⨆d𝒞d,P=|𝒫|.\mathscr{P}=\bigsqcup_{d}\mathscr{C}_{d},\qquad P=|\mathscr{P}|.

Then P≪H⁢x1/2+εP\ll Hx^{1/2+\varepsilon}. Put C⁢(𝒫):=#⁢{(P,Q)∈𝒫2:d⁢(P,Q)≤2⁢r1}C(\mathscr{P}):=\#\{(P,Q)\in\mathscr{P}^{2}:d(P,Q)\leq 2r_{1}\}, where r1r_{1} is the fixed radius in lemma 4.1. Theorem 1.2 gives

C⁢(𝒫)≪Nε⁢(P+x+x3N).C(\mathscr{P})\ll N^{\varepsilon}\left(P+x+\frac{x^{3}}{N}\right). (11)
Lemma 4.1 (Uniform local L1L^{1} evaluation).

Let f⁢(z)⁢d⁢zf(z)\,dz be a holomorphic differential on XNX_{N}, and we put

FN⁢(z)=N‖f‖Pas⁢y⁢f⁢(z),‖f‖Pas2=∫XN|y⁢f⁢(z)|2⁢𝑑μphys⁢(z).F_{N}(z)=\frac{\sqrt{N}}{\|f\|_{\mathrm{Pas}}}\,yf(z),\qquad\|f\|_{\mathrm{Pas% }}^{2}=\int_{X_{N}}|yf(z)|^{2}\,d\mu_{\mathrm{phys}}(z).

We regard FNF_{N} as a unitary automorphic section. Its pointwise norm |FN||F_{N}| is a well defined function on XNX_{N}, and we note that every evaluation and every integral below involving FNF_{N} refers either to this norm or to its powers. For a hyperbolic radius r1r_{1} that is fixed and sufficiently small, we have

|FN⁢(P)|≪VN⁢∫B⁢(P,r1)|FN⁢(z)|⁢𝑑μprob⁢(z),|F_{N}(P)|\ll V_{N}\int_{B(P,r_{1})}|F_{N}(z)|\,d\mu_{\mathrm{prob}}(z),

uniformly for the levels in section 2. Moreover we have ‖FN‖L2⁢(μprob)2=N/VN\|F_{N}\|_{L^{2}(\mu_{\mathrm{prob}})}^{2}=N/V_{N}.

Proof.

Fix a lift P~=x0+i⁢y0\widetilde{P}=x_{0}+iy_{0}. Using the holomorphic submean inequality on a Euclidean disk of radius ρ⁢y0\rho y_{0}, we read off, on a comparable hyperbolic disk,

|y0⁢f⁢(P~)|≪∫B⁢(P~,r1)|y⁢f⁢(z)|⁢𝑑μphys⁢(z),|y_{0}f(\widetilde{P})|\ll\int_{B(\widetilde{P},r_{1})}|yf(z)|\,d\mu_{\mathrm{% phys}}(z),

since y≍y0y\asymp y_{0} and d⁢μphys=d⁢x⁢d⁢y/y2d\mu_{\mathrm{phys}}=dx\,dy/y^{2} hold there.

Next we need to make the descent to the orbifold uniform. The groups ΓN\Gamma_{N} are cocompact, so we conclude that they contain no parabolic elements. Also, a nonelliptic element has an integral reduced trace whose absolute value is at least 33, and so we conclude that its translation length is at least ℓ0=2⁢arcosh⁡(3/2)\ell_{0}=2\operatorname{arcosh}(3/2). We let μ2\mu_{2} denote a Margulis constant for the hyperbolic plane, and choose r1<min⁡{μ2/2,ℓ0/4}r_{1}<\min\{\mu_{2}/2,\ell_{0}/4\}. Applying the two-dimensional Margulis lemma [14] and then the classification of elementary Fuchsian groups, we conclude that the subgroup generated by

{γ∈ΓN:d⁢(P~,γ⁢P~)<2⁢r1}\{\gamma\in\Gamma_{N}:d(\widetilde{P},\gamma\widetilde{P})<2r_{1}\}

is finite. In fact, we note that an infinite elementary subgroup would either contain a parabolic element or preserve a geodesic. In the latter case, for the subgroup generated by the displayed set to have infinitely many elements, we need either a hyperbolic generator or two distinct half-turn generators. As for the hyperbolic generator, it would contradict the length gap, whereas we can also observe here that the product of the two distinct half-turn generators has a translation length shorter than 4⁢r1<ℓ04r_{1}<\ell_{0}. Thus the small-displacement subgroup is finite. A finite subgroup of PSL2⁡(ℝ)\operatorname{PSL}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) is cyclic. Also, any nontrivial torsion lift in this situation has its integral reduced trace lying in {−1,0,1}\{-1,0,1\}, so its projective order is no greater than 33. As a consequence, we can say that the projection of B⁢(P~,r1)B(\widetilde{P},r_{1}) to XNX_{N} has a uniformly bounded multiplicity, because an overlap of B⁢(P~,r1)B(\widetilde{P},r_{1}) with its γ\gamma-translate forces the inequality d⁢(P~,γ⁢P~)<2⁢r1d(\widetilde{P},\gamma\widetilde{P})<2r_{1}. Thus, when we descend the submean inequality that precedes this one, we can see that the effect is that of changing just an absolute constant. Finally, we can take d⁢μphys=VN⁢d⁢μprobd\mu_{\mathrm{phys}}=V_{N}d\mu_{\mathrm{prob}} together with the definition of FNF_{N}, and in this way we read off the estimate that was asserted. The L2L^{2} identity is immediate from the normalizations. ∎

Define

Td⁢(FN)=12⁢hd⁢∑P∈𝒞d|FN⁢(P)|T_{d}(F_{N})=\frac{1}{2h_{d}}\sum_{P\in\mathscr{C}_{d}}|F_{N}(P)|

and the sampling multiplicity μ⁢(z)=∑P∈𝒫𝟏B⁢(P,r1)⁢(z)\mu(z)=\sum_{P\in\mathscr{P}}\mathbf{1}_{B(P,r_{1})}(z). Since any two intersecting balls have their centers at a bounded distance from one another, we can see that

∫μ2⁢𝑑μprob≪C⁢(𝒫)VN.\int\mu^{2}\,d\mu_{\mathrm{prob}}\ll\frac{C(\mathscr{P})}{V_{N}}.

Indeed, after we have expanded the square, we will find that the pairs of centers that contribute are just those whose distance apart is at most 2⁢r12r_{1}, and we can also see that each ball intersection has a probability measure that is equal to O⁢(1/VN)O(1/V_{N}). If we now sum lemma 4.1, and then make use of the lower bound for hdh_{d}, and after that apply Cauchy–Schwarz in space, what we read off is the exact volume cancellation, and it comes out in the form

1H⁢∑dTd⁢(FN)\displaystyle\frac{1}{H}\sum_{d}T_{d}(F_{N}) ≪VNH⁢x1/2−ϑ⁢∫μ⁢|FN|⁢𝑑μprob\displaystyle\ll\frac{V_{N}}{Hx^{1/2-\vartheta}}\int\mu|F_{N}|\,d\mu_{\mathrm{% prob}}
≪N⁢C⁢(𝒫)H⁢x1/2−ϑ.\displaystyle\ll\frac{\sqrt{NC(\mathscr{P})}}{Hx^{1/2-\vartheta}}. (12)

If we now insert (11) together with the bound P≪H⁢x1/2+εP\ll Hx^{1/2+\varepsilon}, what we are left with is three terms:

Ediag=N1/2⁢H−1/2⁢x−1/4+ϑ+ε,Ex=N1/2⁢H−1⁢xϑ+ε,Eoff=H−1⁢x1+ϑ+ε.E_{\mathrm{diag}}=N^{1/2}H^{-1/2}x^{-1/4+\vartheta+\varepsilon},\quad E_{x}=N^% {1/2}H^{-1}x^{\vartheta+\varepsilon},\quad E_{\mathrm{off}}=H^{-1}x^{1+% \vartheta+\varepsilon}.

Under (9)–(10), we can compute that the NN-exponents of these three are

−1760⁢δ+710⁢δ2,−16−15⁢δ+65⁢δ2,τ=(23+δ)⁢6⁢δ5.-\frac{17}{60}\delta+\frac{7}{10}\delta^{2},\qquad-\frac{1}{6}-\frac{1}{5}% \delta+\frac{6}{5}\delta^{2},\qquad\tau=\left(\frac{2}{3}+\delta\right)\frac{6% \delta}{5}.

It is the last of these three terms that is the limiting one here, and in this way we obtain the following proposition.

Proposition 4.2.

In the notation that we have set up in the preceding discussion, uniformly in the admissible factorization N=D⁢MN=DM,

1H⁢∑dTd⁢(FN)≪Nτ+ε,τ=(23+δ)⁢6⁢δ5.\frac{1}{H}\sum_{d}T_{d}(F_{N})\ll N^{\tau+\varepsilon},\qquad\tau=\left(\frac% {2}{3}+\delta\right)\frac{6\delta}{5}.

5. The arithmetic conclusion

First we will need to choose a suitable packet on which logarithms can be taken. Using [12, Lemma 14.3], we can see that if the corresponding rational differential vanishes at one of the CM conjugate points, then it vanishes on the entire Galois orbit as well. Also, we can note that, by the same lemma, the associated modular form has at most N1+ηN^{1+\eta} zeros on ℌ\mathfrak{H}, under ΓN\Gamma_{N}-equivalence, for each fixed η>0\eta>0. Thus, for η=δ/5\eta=\delta/5, we can estimate the number BB of bad discriminants as

B≪N1+δ/5⁢x−1/2+δ/5,BH≪N−δ/2+6⁢δ2/5=o⁢(1).B\ll N^{1+\delta/5}x^{-1/2+\delta/5},\qquad\frac{B}{H}\ll N^{-\delta/2+6\delta% ^{2}/5}=o(1).

Since the negative line of a CM center determines the stabilizing torus of that CM center, which also determines the imaginary quadratic field, we see that all of the CM orbits corresponding to different quadratic fields are pairwise disjoint. Using Markov’s inequality together with the estimate from proposition 4.2, we can get a positive proportion of quadratic fields with Td⁢(FN)≪Nτ+εT_{d}(F_{N})\ll N^{\tau+\varepsilon}. Hence we can be sure that one of them is also zero-free. We now fix such a field KK. In fact, this field belongs to the original sieve, and we can also note that it keeps the logarithmic-derivative bound that was recorded in (10).

In what follows we will let f⁢(z)⁢d⁢z=fD,M⁢(z)⁢d⁢zf(z)\,dz=f_{D,M}(z)\,dz be the integral quaternionic differential in Pasten’s construction, that is to say, the differential which comes from the modular parametrization in the form in which he records it in his Equation (16.3). For all of the conjugates PσP_{\sigma}, and with a lift τσ∈ℌ\tau_{\sigma}\in\mathfrak{H} chosen for each one of them, we will write uσ=|f⁢(τσ)|⁢Im⁡τσ>0u_{\sigma}=|f(\tau_{\sigma})|\operatorname{Im}\tau_{\sigma}>0. Then, from the normalization that was recorded in lemma 4.1, we can read off uσ=‖f‖Pas⁢|FN⁢(Pσ)|/Nu_{\sigma}=\|f\|_{\mathrm{Pas}}|F_{N}(P_{\sigma})|/\sqrt{N}. Now, using ordinary AM–GM together with the first-moment estimate that was selected above, we can then go on to obtain

12⁢hK⁢∑σlog⁡uσ≤log⁡‖f‖Pas−12⁢log⁡N+(τ+ε)⁢log⁡N+O⁢(1).\frac{1}{2h_{K}}\sum_{\sigma}\log u_{\sigma}\leq\log\|f\|_{\mathrm{Pas}}-\frac% {1}{2}\log N+(\tau+\varepsilon)\log N+O(1). (13)

Also, Proposition 14.2 in Pasten is given with respect to exactly this hyperbolic metric, and therefore we can see that it implies

hAr⁢(PK)≥−log⁡(2⁢M)−12⁢hK⁢∑σlog⁡uσ.h_{\mathrm{Ar}}(P_{K})\geq-\log(2M)-\frac{1}{2h_{K}}\sum_{\sigma}\log u_{% \sigma}.

Now, using his height formula [12, Theorem 13.2] in the form in which it is recorded there, after the functional equation has been applied, we can go on to obtain

hAr⁢(PK)=L′L⁢(1,χK)+12⁢log⁡(d⁢D)+O⁢(1).h_{\mathrm{Ar}}(P_{K})=\frac{L^{\prime}}{L}(1,\chi_{K})+\frac{1}{2}\log(dD)+O(% 1).

Then, combining these formulas, and using N=D⁢MN=DM together with d≤2⁢N2/3+δd\leq 2N^{2/3+\delta}, and together with the logarithmic-derivative estimate that was retained above, we can now go on to deduce that

−log⁡‖f‖Pas≤12⁢log⁡M+(13+δ2+τ+ε)⁢log⁡N.-\log\|f\|_{\mathrm{Pas}}\leq\frac{1}{2}\log M+\left(\frac{1}{3}+\frac{\delta}% {2}+\tau+\varepsilon\right)\log N. (14)

In preparation for the final step of the argument, we will now single out the one consequence of Pasten’s modular-degree comparison that is used there.

Proposition 5.1 (Pasten interface).

For the Frey branch and for an admissible factorization N=D⁢MN=DM which has the property that MM is divisible by at least two odd primes, we have the following estimate

∏p∣Dvp⁢(ΔE)≪εN1+ε⁢‖f‖Pas−2,\prod_{p\mid D}v_{p}(\Delta_{E})\ll_{\varepsilon}N^{1+\varepsilon}\|f\|_{% \mathrm{Pas}}^{-2},

uniformly in the admissible factorization.

Proof.

Now, from Pasten’s Theorem 6.1(b.2), what we can read off is

log⁢∏p∣Dvp⁢(ΔE)≤log⁡δ1,N−log⁡δD,M+O⁢(ω⁢(D)).\log\prod_{p\mid D}v_{p}(\Delta_{E})\leq\log\delta_{1,N}-\log\delta_{D,M}+O(% \omega(D)).

Using the degree relations (16.1)–(16.3), which are combined in [12, Theorem 16.1, pp. 305–307] and invoked in his Theorem 16.5(ii), we can then go on to read off the estimate

log⁢∏p∣Dvp⁢(ΔE)\displaystyle\log\prod_{p\mid D}v_{p}(\Delta_{E}) ≤2⁢log⁡|cf|+2⁢log⁡‖f1,N‖2−2⁢log⁡‖fD,M‖2\displaystyle\leq 2\log|c_{f}|+2\log\|f_{1,N}\|_{2}-2\log\|f_{D,M}\|_{2}
+O⁢(log⁡log⁡N+ω⁢(D)).\displaystyle\quad+O(\log\log N+\omega(D)).

Now the minimal isogeny has degree at most 163163 by an application of the Mazur–Kenku theorem, in the form in which it is recorded in [12, proof of Theorem 16.1]. Thus the difference between the two terms which are associated with the Faltings height is O⁢(1)O(1). In the same normalization, the classical estimate of ‖f1,N‖22≪N⁢log⁡N\|f_{1,N}\|_{2}^{2}\ll N\log N, the Manin constant estimate that is due to Pasten [12, Theorem 1.1 and proof of Theorem 16.1], and the bound ω⁢(D)≪log⁡N/log⁡log⁡N\omega(D)\ll\log N/\log\log N together imply that for sufficiently large NN the right-hand side is at most

(1+ε)⁢log⁡N−2⁢log⁡‖fD,M‖2.(1+\varepsilon)\log N-2\log\|f_{D,M}\|_{2}.

Finally, the non-normalized Petersson norms of Pasten take into account the same physical hyperbolic measure [12, Section 4.6], and therefore we can conclude that ‖fD,M‖2=‖f‖Pas\|f_{D,M}\|_{2}=\|f\|_{\mathrm{Pas}}. All constants just used are absolute or depend only on ε\varepsilon (the Manin-constant theorem is applied with the fixed exceptional set {2}\{2\}), so the estimate is uniform in (D,M)(D,M). This proves the statement while additionally showing explicitly that the Frey branch contributes no further factor of DD. ∎

For every factorization satisfying the hypothesis of proposition 5.1, applying it to (14) gives us the cell estimate

∏p∣Dvp⁢(ΔE)≪εNqδ+ε⁢M,qδ=1+(23+δ)+2⁢τ=53+135⁢δ+125⁢δ2.\prod_{p\mid D}v_{p}(\Delta_{E})\ll_{\varepsilon}N^{q_{\delta}+\varepsilon}M,% \qquad q_{\delta}=1+\left(\frac{2}{3}+\delta\right)+2\tau=\frac{5}{3}+\frac{13% }{5}\delta+\frac{12}{5}\delta^{2}. (15)

The implied constant in (15) is uniform in the admissible factorization.

It remains to distribute the factor MM. In what follows we write the odd part of NN as p1⁢⋯⁢pmp_{1}\cdots p_{m}, but the bounded factor 2r2^{r} remains. If mm exceeds a fixed cutoff, then we can be sure that all subsequent levels contain at least two odd primes, as required in proposition 5.1. In the even case m−2m-2 is even, and in the odd case m−3m-3 is even. As a result, each DjD_{j} described below is an admissible indefinite quaternion discriminant and after the fixed cutoff has been increased, will exceed 1. Moreover (Dj,Mj)=1(D_{j},M_{j})=1, and all constants are uniform in jj. We then take each entry (Dj,Mj)(D_{j},M_{j}) and apply to it the sieve, the pair estimates, the first-moment selection, and the Pasten interface. Note that the selected field can depend on jj and that the earlier established uniformity makes the cell estimate independent of jj. If mm is even, apply (15) cyclically with

Mj=2r⁢pj⁢pj+1,Dj=p1⁢⋯⁢pmpj⁢pj+1.M_{j}=2^{r}p_{j}p_{j+1},\qquad D_{j}=\frac{p_{1}\cdots p_{m}}{p_{j}p_{j+1}}.

We can note that all valuations occur on m−2m-2 left-hand sides, and that all odd primes are included in two MjM_{j}. If Qodd=∏i=1m(2⁢vpi⁢(a⁢b⁢c))=∏i=1mvpi⁢(ΔE)Q_{\mathrm{odd}}=\prod_{i=1}^{m}\bigl{(}2v_{p_{i}}(abc)\bigr{)}=\prod_{i=1}^{m% }v_{p_{i}}(\Delta_{E}), let Cδ,ε≥1C_{\delta,\varepsilon}\geq 1 be the uniform implied constant in (15). Multiplication gives

Qoddm−2≤Cδ,εm⁢Nm⁢(qδ+ε)⁢∏j=1mMj,∏j=1mMj=2r⁢(m−2)⁢N2.Q_{\mathrm{odd}}^{m-2}\leq C_{\delta,\varepsilon}^{m}N^{m(q_{\delta}+% \varepsilon)}\prod_{j=1}^{m}M_{j},\qquad\prod_{j=1}^{m}M_{j}=2^{r(m-2)}N^{2}.

Since m/(m−2)≤2m/(m-2)\leq 2 for even m≥4m\geq 4 and r≤8r\leq 8, taking the (m−2)(m-2)-nd root leaves at most the bounded constant Cδ,ε2⁢28C_{\delta,\varepsilon}^{2}2^{8}. Thus

Qodd≪Nqδ+(2⁢qδ+2)/(m−2)+O⁢(ε).Q_{\mathrm{odd}}\ll N^{q_{\delta}+(2q_{\delta}+2)/(m-2)+O(\varepsilon)}. (16)

If mm is odd, use cyclic triples

Mj=2r⁢pj⁢pj+1⁢pj+2,Dj=p1⁢⋯⁢pmpj⁢pj+1⁢pj+2,M_{j}=2^{r}p_{j}p_{j+1}p_{j+2},\qquad D_{j}=\frac{p_{1}\cdots p_{m}}{p_{j}p_{j% +1}p_{j+2}},

for which

Qoddm−3≤Cδ,εm⁢Nm⁢(qδ+ε)⁢∏j=1mMj,∏j=1mMj=2r⁢(m−3)⁢N3.Q_{\mathrm{odd}}^{m-3}\leq C_{\delta,\varepsilon}^{m}N^{m(q_{\delta}+% \varepsilon)}\prod_{j=1}^{m}M_{j},\qquad\prod_{j=1}^{m}M_{j}=2^{r(m-3)}N^{3}.

Here m/(m−3)≤5/2m/(m-3)\leq 5/2 for odd m≥5m\geq 5, so the rooted constant is at most Cδ,ε5/2⁢28C_{\delta,\varepsilon}^{5/2}2^{8}. Consequently

Qodd≪Nqδ+(3⁢qδ+3)/(m−3)+O⁢(ε).Q_{\mathrm{odd}}\ll N^{q_{\delta}+(3q_{\delta}+3)/(m-3)+O(\varepsilon)}. (17)

If m≤m0m\leq m_{0} for the chosen fixed cutoff, then we can see that ω⁢(a⁢b⁢c)=m+1≤m0+1\omega(abc)=m+1\leq m_{0}+1. We can first employ Pasten’s Proposition 15.1 with a smaller internal epsilon and then select the maximum over these finitely many values, which gives 𝐝⁢(a⁢b⁢c)≪ε,m0R1+ε\mathbf{d}(abc)\ll_{\varepsilon,m_{0}}R^{1+\varepsilon} [12, Proposition 15.1]. From his Lemma 15.2 we can read off v2⁢(a⁢b⁢c)≪εRεv_{2}(abc)\ll_{\varepsilon}R^{\varepsilon} [12, Lemma 15.2 and Equation (16.4)], and the Frey conductor satisfies N≍RN\asymp R. Finally,

P⁢(a⁢b⁢c)≤𝐝⁢(a⁢b⁢c)≤(v2⁢(a⁢b⁢c)+1)⁢Qodd.P(abc)\leq\mathbf{d}(abc)\leq\bigl{(}v_{2}(abc)+1\bigr{)}Q_{\mathrm{odd}}.

In this last step we needed to use the inequality v+1≤2⁢vv+1\leq 2v, and we needed it for each positive integer value vv at the odd primes in question.

Given ε0>0\varepsilon_{0}>0, we first need to choose a fixed 0<δ<1/100<\delta<1/10 for which 13⁢δ/5+12⁢δ2/5<ε0/413\delta/5+12\delta^{2}/5<\varepsilon_{0}/4 holds. In the next step we need to ensure that the combined internal epsilon loss is below ε0/4\varepsilon_{0}/4 and we need to select the prime-count cutoff such that both the overheads in (16)–(17) fall below ε0/4\varepsilon_{0}/4 above it. Here we can rely on Proposition 15.1 of Pasten, which takes care of those cases where mm is equal to or lower than our cutoff. The finitely many conductors below the previously established thresholds end up in the implied constant, and we do not track the effective dependence of that constant on ε0\varepsilon_{0}. With that we have proved theorem 1.1.

Remark 5.2.

We attain the exponent 5/35/3 in the proof by means of the discriminant scale Δ=N2/3+o⁢(1)\Delta=N^{2/3+o(1)}. We see that the above reasoning does not prove the abc conjecture. In fact, we note that it handles only the product of valuation exponents and the divisor function, not a⁢b⁢cabc itself.

Notation

R=rad⁡(a⁢b⁢c)R=\operatorname{rad}(abc) radical of the a⁢b⁢cabc triple
P⁢(a⁢b⁢c)P(abc), 𝐝⁢(n)\mathbf{d}(n) valuation product and divisor function
BB indefinite quaternion division algebra over ℚ\mathbb{Q}
BB (in §5) number of bad discriminants
B0B^{0}, Q=−nrdQ=-\operatorname{nrd} trace-zero space and its quadratic form
BQB_{Q} full polarization of QQ, so BQ⁢(x,y)=trd⁡(x⁢y)B_{Q}(x,y)=\operatorname{trd}(xy)
DD discriminant of BB
MM Eichler level
N=D⁢MN=DM reduced discriminant of RNR_{N}, and the Frey conductor
RNR_{N} Eichler order of reduced discriminant NN
ΓN=RN1/{±1}\Gamma_{N}=R_{N}^{1}/\{\pm 1\} norm-one units modulo ±1\pm 1
ℌ\mathfrak{H} upper half plane
XN=ΓN\ℌX_{N}=\Gamma_{N}\backslash\mathfrak{H} the Shimura curve
VN=vol⁡(XN)V_{N}=\operatorname{vol}(X_{N}) its hyperbolic volume
LN⊂B0L_{N}\subset B^{0} Gross lattice of [3, Equation (2.9)]
G=SO⁡(B0)G=\operatorname{SO}(B^{0}) ≃B×/ℚ×\simeq B^{\times}/\mathbb{Q}^{\times}
𝒦p\mathcal{K}_{p}, 𝒦=∏p𝒦p\mathcal{K}=\prod_{p}\mathcal{K}_{p} local projective unit image and its product
TT, RT⁢(D,M)R_{T}(D,M) characteristic matrix, and its norm-one class set
Sp⁢(T)S_{p}(T), cp⁢(T)c_{p}(T) local integral-coset set and its cardinality
−d-d, −e-e odd fundamental CM discriminants
hdh_{d} class number of ℚ⁢(−d)\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-d})
𝒞d\mathscr{C}_{d} the complete 2⁢hd2h_{d}-element Galois multiset
Δ\Delta the CM discriminant scale
𝒫Δ\mathscr{P}_{\Delta} a multiset of CM centers with d∈[Δ,2⁢Δ]d\in[\Delta,2\Delta]
B0B_{0} bound on multiplicities in 𝒫Δ\mathscr{P}_{\Delta}
𝒫=⨆d𝒞d\mathscr{P}=\bigsqcup_{d}\mathscr{C}_{d} the full Galois CM multiset
C⁢(𝒫)C(\mathscr{P}) number of ordered pairs of 𝒫\mathscr{P} within 2⁢r12r_{1}
HH number of discriminants produced by Pasten’s sieve
x=N2/3+δx=N^{2/3+\delta}, ϑ=δ/5\vartheta=\delta/5 sieve parameters
f⁢(z)⁢d⁢zf(z)\,dz holomorphic differential on XNX_{N}, f=fD,Mf=f_{D,M} in §5
‖f‖Pas\|f\|_{\mathrm{Pas}} its non-normalized Petersson norm
FNF_{N} the unitary normalization N⁢y⁢f/‖f‖Pas\sqrt{N}\,yf/\|f\|_{\mathrm{Pas}}
Td⁢(FN)T_{d}(F_{N}) first absolute moment of |FN||F_{N}| over 𝒞d\mathscr{C}_{d}
μ⁢(z)\mu(z) sampling multiplicity of the balls B⁢(P,r1)B(P,r_{1})
r0r_{0}, r1r_{1} fixed hyperbolic radii
τ\tau, qδq_{\delta} moment exponent and cell exponent
ΔE\Delta_{E} discriminant of the Frey curve EE

References

  • [1] Montserrat Alsina and Dimitrios Chatzakos, CM-points and lattice counting on arithmetic compact Riemann surfaces, Journal of Number Theory 212 (2020), 339–353.
  • [2] Valentin Blomer and Roman Holowinsky, Bounding sup-norms of cusp forms of large level, Inventiones Mathematicae 179 (2010), no. 3, 645–681.
  • [3] Jan Hendrik Bruinier, Yingkun Li, and Martin Möller, Intersections of special cycles on Shimura curves and Siegel Maass forms, 2026, arXiv:2602.16248v1 [math.NT], February 2026.
  • [4] Soumya Das and Jyoti Sengupta, L∞L^{\infty} norms of holomorphic modular forms in the case of compact quotient, Forum Mathematicum 27 (2015), no. 4, 1987–2001.
  • [5] Gergely Harcos and Philippe Michel, The subconvexity problem for Rankin–Selberg L-functions and equidistribution of Heegner points. II, Inventiones Mathematicae 163 (2006), 581–655.
  • [6] Peter Humphries and Maksym Radziwiłł, Optimal small scale equidistribution of lattice points on the sphere, Heegner points, and closed geodesics, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 75 (2022), 1936–1996.
  • [7] Ilya Khayutin, Joint equidistribution of CM points, Annals of Mathematics 189 (2019), no. 1, 145–276.
  • [8] Stephen S. Kudla, Michael Rapoport, and Tonghai Yang, Modular forms and special cycles on Shimura curves, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 161, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2006.
  • [9] Sheng-Chi Liu, Riad Masri, and Matthew P. Young, Subconvexity and equidistribution of Heegner points in the level aspect, Compositio Mathematica 149 (2013), 1150–1174.
  • [10] Philippe Michel, The subconvexity problem for Rankin–Selberg L-functions and equidistribution of Heegner points, Annals of Mathematics 160 (2004), no. 1, 185–236.
  • [11] Oana Padurariu and Frederick Saia, Bielliptic Shimura curves X0D⁢(N)X_{0}^{D}(N) with nontrivial level, Research in Number Theory 11 (2025), no. 1, Paper No. 2, 23 pp., Correction, ibid. 11 (2025), no. 4, Paper No. 98; arXiv:2401.08829 [math.NT].
  • [12] Hector Pasten, Shimura curves and the a⁢b⁢cabc conjecture, Journal of Number Theory 254 (2024), 214–335.
  • [13] Hector Pasten and Rocío Sepúlveda-Manzo, On the a⁢b⁢cabc and the a⁢b⁢c⁢dabcd conjectures, Bulletin of the Brazilian Mathematical Society, New Series 56 (2025), no. 4, 54, arXiv:2406.05083 [math.NT].
  • [14] John G. Ratcliffe, Foundations of hyperbolic manifolds, third ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 149, Springer, Cham, 2019.
  • [15] James Rickards, Counting intersection numbers of closed geodesics on Shimura curves, Research in Number Theory 9 (2023), no. 2, Article 20.
  • [16] John Voight, Quaternion algebras, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 288, Springer, Cham, 2021.
  • [17] Andreas Wieser and Pengyu Yang, A uniform Linnik basic lemma and entropy bounds, 2026, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, published online January 22, 2026; arXiv:2201.05380 [math.NT].
  • [18] Xinyi Yuan and Shou-Wu Zhang, On the averaged Colmez conjecture, Annals of Mathematics 187 (2018), no. 2, 533–638.
  • [19] Shou-Wu Zhang, Heights of Heegner points on Shimura curves, Annals of Mathematics 153 (2001), no. 1, 27–147.
  • [20] by same author, Equidistribution of CM-points on quaternion Shimura varieties, International Mathematics Research Notices (2005), no. 59, 3657–3689.