An Aggregate CM-Pair Estimate and a Bound for Valuation Products of Triples
Abstract.
Let be pairwise coprime positive integers. Then, we introduce and . We present here the proof of
where is taken to be the divisor function. The first step in the deduction gives an aggregate fixed-radius estimate for CM points on an indefinite Shimura curve. In the case where the CM discriminants lie in , the number of nearby ordered pairs is
which holds uniformly in all polynomial ranges . This is established by an elementary local orbit count in the Bruhat–Tits tree, using the characteristic-matrix framework of Bruinier, Li and Möller. The spatial Cauchy–Schwarz then yields a bound for the first absolute moment of the CM-packet. The ordinary AM–GM now applies directly to the logarithmic average in Pasten’s Arakelov estimate to complete the argument, and neither a fourth moment nor a pointwise subconvexity estimate is required.
Key words and phrases:
abc triples, Shimura curves, CM points, quaternion orders, valuations2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 11G18; Secondary 11G05, 11D75, 11R291. Introduction
Let be pairwise coprime positive integers satisfying . Here
Using a comparison between classical and quaternionic modular degrees, Pasten was able to derive the unconditional bounds by evaluating an integral differential at CM points [12, Theorem 1.11 and Theorem 16.8]. Our main result is a reduction of the exponent.
Rickards has established precise formulas regarding the intersections of closed geodesics associated with pairs of real quadratic embeddings. These formulas include -linking and local Eichler-order information [15, Theorems 10 and 63]. More recently, Bruinier–Li–Möller considered all signatures of a pair of quadratic vectors. More specifically, their formula gives the number of pairs of Heegner points at a given distance, and this number is a product of local factors [3, Theorem 1.1(iv) and Corollary 5.9]. We use Bruinier–Li–Möller’s characteristic-matrix and distance formalism, but prove the coarse orbit bound needed here directly from the local structure of quaternion orders and the Bruhat–Tits tree [16, Equation (23.2.4), Theorem 13.3.11, and Sections 23.5.11–23.5.16]. The aggregate estimate provides us with the divisor-sum bound we need for Pasten’s argument.
In the context of the theory of special cycles, Heegner points, and quaternionic Shimura varieties, the natural objects in that framework are CM points [8, 20, 19, 18]. Complete or structured packets satisfy the equidistribution, variance, and small-scale bounds [10, 5, 7, 9, 1, 6, 17]. None of these works states our fixed-radius bound for arbitrary selected submultisets. Our approach is to substitute the classical sup-norm techniques [2, 4] with a local inequality. Later abc work treats different functionals or additional size hypotheses [13].
Theorem 1.1.
For every and for every pairwise coprime triple of positive integers , we have
Geometrically speaking, let stand for an Eichler order of reduced discriminant in an indefinite quaternion division algebra, putting . We assume that the odd part of is square-free, and that . For odd fundamental discriminants, being coprime to , and , choose as any multiset of the related CM centers where the multiplicity of each one does not exceed a fixed .
Theorem 1.2 (Aggregate CM-pair estimate).
Fix and . If and every multiplicity in is at most , then
The estimate is uniform both in the chosen discriminant submultiset and in the admissible factorization .
For pairs lying on the off-diagonal, we will set to be the discriminants and to be the integral pairing parameter. The local conditions state that the odd part of has to divide . A direct local orbit count gives an upper bound of for each global orbit count. After we have fixed the radius we will be down to choices for and the quotient. These choices fix , and can have at most admissible factorizations. Further, the thinning of the packets considered here will only eliminate pairs.
In the case of , that is, the corresponding full Galois CM multiset from Pasten’s construction, we use and . Then, using theorem 1.2, the local holomorphic inequality, and the spatial form of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, we obtain
Here . Applying zero-counting and Markov’s inequality at this point, we obtain a full packet that is free of zeros, on which the first absolute moment is . We write , and for these we need only AM–GM:
Using these first moment and AM–GM bounds along with Pasten’s Proposition 14.2, height formula, and modular-degree comparison gives the cell exponent . In place of Pasten’s norm exponent value of , we can put the value that our aggregate first-moment estimate gives us. With that replacement, changes to . Finally, the cyclic pairs and triples will distribute the level factors that are left, and we let to obtain the proof of theorem 1.1.
2. Quaternionic CM packets
Let represent an indefinite quaternion division algebra over , and let denote an Eichler order of reduced discriminant , where is the discriminant of and the Eichler level. As in Pasten, a factorization is called admissible when and is the product of an even number of distinct primes; in the compact case considered below, . We assume that the odd part of is square-free and that . Write
In this notation we write for the hyperbolic measure in the physical sense, we let be the probability measure, and we set . Using the exact volume formula from [3, Equation (2.7)], we get, for every ,
As for the Gross lattice, we can write it out in the following form
In what follows we adopt the source convention on the trace-zero space, with its full polarization
on the same space, so that . We note that the primitive vectors representing imaginary quadratic discriminant satisfy . Taking lifts and signs for the associated negative lines, we read off the relation
In fact, if we divide and by the square roots of and , we recognize the standard distance equation for the negative sheet of the hyperboloid model, the being the contribution of the full polarization.
Lemma 2.1 (Lattice and characteristic-matrix normalization).
The lattice is exactly the index-four lattice that we find in [3, Equation (2.9)]. An optimal embedding of the imaginary quadratic maximal order of odd fundamental discriminant determines, up to sign, a primitive with , and the converse holds as well. For a pair , the characteristic matrix in the notation of Bruinier–Li–Möller is
Proof.
If , we can check that either lies in or , according to the parity of . In both cases the converse holds as well, and we obtain the equality with the lattice in [3, Equation (2.9)]. Let us assume now that and , with being an odd fundamental discriminant. Then cannot belong to , therefore . Since
defines an embedding of the maximal order into , and this embedding is optimal since the source order is maximal. Conversely, an optimal embedding sends to the vector with . This vector is primitive. Indeed, because for , and hence a factorization in , with , would force , contrary to the square-freeness of . This proves the stated correspondence, and it also proves the normalization in the characteristic matrix . In addition, let us state the values and , where both have the reduced trace value of one. Then
so is odd. This direct calculation fixes the normalization that we will use below, and we can check that its off-diagonal entry agrees with [3, Equation (2.14)]. ∎
In what follows, we will take CM discriminants to be coprime to and to lie in .
Remark 2.2.
In the following, we will write for the class number of , while will denote the complete -element Galois multiset of Pasten, and not a selected orientation packet. Moreover, we can use the fact that the CM point of Pasten has a residue field equal to the Hilbert class field [12, Section 13.1], which ensures that these conjugates are distinct quotient points. Each of the elements is a CM center of discriminant , and hence we can see that it has the primitive-vector realization in lemma 2.1. Since the pair estimate is uniform for submultisets, we do not need to identify this Galois multiset with one prescribed system of local orientations. As for standard optimal-embedding counts with a fixed local class, we can find such counts stated in [11, Theorem 2.5].
Remark 2.3.
For nonsingular , we can recall that Bruinier–Li–Möller identify with the diagonal norm-one orbit set of ordered pairs in that have characteristic matrix . See their definition of together with [3, Equation (2.9)]. The paragraph preceding their Theorem 5.7 explicitly states that the lattice in use for their subsequent local computations is reset to the localization of this same index-four lattice. Their count allows for the inclusion of imprimitive pairs while the CM centers are derived from primitive vectors, so we can see that the latter classes form a subset. The bound for the entire orbit set below is obtained from a direct local coset count and does not use an exact local-density formula. Indeed, a CM center determines its negative rational line, on which a primitive vector of norm is unique up to sign, since any two such vectors differ by a rational scalar with square equal to one. In moving to the quotient, at most an elliptic stabilizer can be added, and by the integral-trace argument in the proof of lemma 4.1, the projective order of that stabilizer is bounded by . Thus the fibers of the map from primitive-vector classes to CM centers are uniformly bounded, and the bounded multiplicities in will be absorbed in the implied constant.
3. The aggregate CM-pair estimate
We prove theorem 1.2.
Lemma 3.1 (Primitive local-factor bound).
Let
where are odd fundamental discriminants, , is odd, and is nonsingular. Assume that the odd part of is square-free and . We let denote the complete set of all norm-one equivalence classes with characteristic matrix , for the order of discriminant and level . When the order is clear we write for that set. If is nonempty, then
| (1) |
Moreover, uniformly for , , and ,
| (2) |
Proof.
Write with odd. For , let be the Eichler overorder of of level ; admissibility gives . Then
Thus every -orbit splits into at most many orbits of . The local Eichler index, equivalently the quotient of the exact volume formulas in [3, Equation (2.7)], is
| (3) |
It remains to treat the odd-level order. Put , , , and for the rest of this proof. Notice that the odd part of is .
Put . Fix a rational pair with Gram matrix , and, for each finite prime , write
The action of on ordered pairs of Gram matrix is simply transitive for and . Indeed, an isometry between the two nondegenerate planes extends by Witt’s theorem, its determinant can be corrected on the orthogonal line, and an element of fixing the pair also fixes that line because it has determinant one. The orbit map is a homeomorphism: its inverse is obtained by completing with their cross-product vector, and its only denominator is a fixed nonzero multiple of . Hence the inverse image of the closed integral Gram fiber in the compact set is compact. Since is open, every is finite.
We next record the global-to-local injection. If , then
| (4) |
To see this, represent a class in the intersection by and write locally, with and . Since , multiplication by the rational number having valuation at every gives an element, and its inverse, in every . The identity proves (4). Simple transitivity now maps full-unit global orbits injectively into the restricted product . Passing from full units to norm-one units costs an index at most two, and hence
| (5) |
We count the local cosets directly. At an odd prime, . If is split and is maximal, then is the vertex set of the Bruhat–Tits tree. An integral change in the two pair coordinates puts the first elementary divisor first. If it is a unit, choose the first vector with . When is nonsquare, is the maximal unramified quadratic order and its stable lattices give at most one homothety class. When , the integral idempotents put
The -stable lattices are , and stabilizes exactly for
As , this gives at most vertices. If the first elementary divisor is , square-freeness of allows us to choose . The order is then the maximal order of a ramified quadratic field. Its fractional ideals, modulo central homothety, have two parity classes, so ; here .
If is an odd division prime, the unique maximal order and its Gross lattice are invariant under conjugation, while
Thus a nonempty support has . Reduction of modulo the radical is one-dimensional, so such a represented pair has . Finally, when , the group fixes an oriented edge. Since , the maximal-order support is either one vertex or an interval of vertices as above. The former gives no edge, and the latter gives oriented edges. Hence
| (6) |
These tree and order identifications are standard; see [16, Equation (23.2.4), Theorem 13.3.11, Lemma 23.5.15, and Sections 23.5.11–23.5.16].
It remains to count at . Since are odd fundamental discriminants and is odd, and . An integral shear gives
In the split algebra the Gross lattice of the standard maximal order is
For a unit-norm first vector , membership in the Gross lattice of a maximal order is equivalent to . Indeed, writing , the oddness of forces to be odd; the converse follows from trace one. If , this element generates the unramified maximal quadratic order, whose stable lattices form one homothety class. If , scale by a unit and take . The integral idempotent forces every stable lattice to split along the two eigenlines. Writing , the initial Gross integrality gives , while . Gross integrality at is equivalent to
which gives at most vertices. In the dyadic division algebra the unique maximal order is again invariant under conjugation and the projective unit quotient has order two. Consequently
| (7) | ||||||
Every nontrivial local factor is therefore attached to a prime divisor of and, in every branch of (6)–(7),
At an odd prime dividing , the same rank-one reductions used above also give , proving . Thus
Together with (3), the bounds and , and the standard divisor bound, this proves (2), uniformly in the admissible factorization. ∎
Proof of theorem 1.2.
For each ordered pair of quotient centers, we will need to choose lifts that realize the respective quotient distance after shifting one of the two by a member of . In turn, we see that the corresponding simultaneous -class of primitive vectors is counted by the appropriate . By lemma 2.1, we see that its characteristic matrix is
We need to select signs for the two primitive vectors independently in such a way that . Then, from the hyperboloid calculation preceding lemma 2.1, we can read off . Also, we can switch either sign, replacing by , but the CM center remains unchanged. Then we will find that the sign-invariant form is
| (8) |
We let denote the complete set of norm-one equivalence classes with characteristic matrix , and we write . We will treat the singular and the nonsingular cases separately.
If is singular, then we can see that (8) gives distance zero. Since are both fundamental, we see that also gives . Hence we can conclude that the corresponding quotient centers agree. With the multiplicity of a center, we can read off from the bounded multiplicity that . Together with the bounded fibres in remark 2.3, we see that this bound provides a contribution given by . For a nonsingular pair we will need lemma 3.1. If the pair is at distance at most , then we see that (8) gives possibilities for . We can now put
The form has signature . The reverse Cauchy–Schwarz inequality on its negative cone gives
with equality only when and are proportional. Since and is nonsingular, the inequality is strict here; therefore . Together with (1), this shows that is a positive integer. Since the standing hypothesis gives , Equations (8) and (1) give
For fixed and , we see that the product is fixed as well. Then we can bound the number of ordered factor pairs by its divisor function value. That divisor function value is throughout the polynomial range. The conditions on fundamental discriminants and coprimality thin this set of pairs, but as we can see they add nothing. The summation of (2) over and therefore leads us to
off the diagonal. Restricting to submultisets removes pairs and does nothing else, apart from the bounded multiplicities that were already controlled. This proves the theorem. ∎
4. A first absolute CM-packet moment
We now place theorem 1.2 in Pasten’s family. For an abc triple, let be the conductor of the Frey curve attached to that triple, and choose an admissible factorization . Let be a parameter to be fixed at the end. For this Frey curve, Pasten records
at every odd prime one has [12, Section 3 and proof of Theorem 16.8]. Thus the odd part of is square-free and the hypotheses of section 2 hold for every admissible factorization used below. Pasten’s sieve [12, Theorem 11.1 and Corollary 11.2], along with
| (9) |
produces odd fundamental discriminants , with , in which all the primes dividing are inert while all the primes dividing are split in , and
| (10) |
In particular, all these discriminants are coprime to . In this situation we can apply the corollary that we cited, because , and we can note that its constants are uniform in the admissible factorization . Let be the full -element Galois multiset in remark 2.2, and set
Then . Put , where is the fixed radius in lemma 4.1. Theorem 1.2 gives
| (11) |
Lemma 4.1 (Uniform local evaluation).
Let be a holomorphic differential on , and we put
We regard as a unitary automorphic section. Its pointwise norm is a well defined function on , and we note that every evaluation and every integral below involving refers either to this norm or to its powers. For a hyperbolic radius that is fixed and sufficiently small, we have
uniformly for the levels in section 2. Moreover we have .
Proof.
Fix a lift . Using the holomorphic submean inequality on a Euclidean disk of radius , we read off, on a comparable hyperbolic disk,
since and hold there.
Next we need to make the descent to the orbifold uniform. The groups are cocompact, so we conclude that they contain no parabolic elements. Also, a nonelliptic element has an integral reduced trace whose absolute value is at least , and so we conclude that its translation length is at least . We let denote a Margulis constant for the hyperbolic plane, and choose . Applying the two-dimensional Margulis lemma [14] and then the classification of elementary Fuchsian groups, we conclude that the subgroup generated by
is finite. In fact, we note that an infinite elementary subgroup would either contain a parabolic element or preserve a geodesic. In the latter case, for the subgroup generated by the displayed set to have infinitely many elements, we need either a hyperbolic generator or two distinct half-turn generators. As for the hyperbolic generator, it would contradict the length gap, whereas we can also observe here that the product of the two distinct half-turn generators has a translation length shorter than . Thus the small-displacement subgroup is finite. A finite subgroup of is cyclic. Also, any nontrivial torsion lift in this situation has its integral reduced trace lying in , so its projective order is no greater than . As a consequence, we can say that the projection of to has a uniformly bounded multiplicity, because an overlap of with its -translate forces the inequality . Thus, when we descend the submean inequality that precedes this one, we can see that the effect is that of changing just an absolute constant. Finally, we can take together with the definition of , and in this way we read off the estimate that was asserted. The identity is immediate from the normalizations. ∎
Define
and the sampling multiplicity . Since any two intersecting balls have their centers at a bounded distance from one another, we can see that
Indeed, after we have expanded the square, we will find that the pairs of centers that contribute are just those whose distance apart is at most , and we can also see that each ball intersection has a probability measure that is equal to . If we now sum lemma 4.1, and then make use of the lower bound for , and after that apply Cauchy–Schwarz in space, what we read off is the exact volume cancellation, and it comes out in the form
| (12) |
If we now insert (11) together with the bound , what we are left with is three terms:
Under (9)–(10), we can compute that the -exponents of these three are
It is the last of these three terms that is the limiting one here, and in this way we obtain the following proposition.
Proposition 4.2.
In the notation that we have set up in the preceding discussion, uniformly in the admissible factorization ,
5. The arithmetic conclusion
First we will need to choose a suitable packet on which logarithms can be taken. Using [12, Lemma 14.3], we can see that if the corresponding rational differential vanishes at one of the CM conjugate points, then it vanishes on the entire Galois orbit as well. Also, we can note that, by the same lemma, the associated modular form has at most zeros on , under -equivalence, for each fixed . Thus, for , we can estimate the number of bad discriminants as
Since the negative line of a CM center determines the stabilizing torus of that CM center, which also determines the imaginary quadratic field, we see that all of the CM orbits corresponding to different quadratic fields are pairwise disjoint. Using Markov’s inequality together with the estimate from proposition 4.2, we can get a positive proportion of quadratic fields with . Hence we can be sure that one of them is also zero-free. We now fix such a field . In fact, this field belongs to the original sieve, and we can also note that it keeps the logarithmic-derivative bound that was recorded in (10).
In what follows we will let be the integral quaternionic differential in Pasten’s construction, that is to say, the differential which comes from the modular parametrization in the form in which he records it in his Equation (16.3). For all of the conjugates , and with a lift chosen for each one of them, we will write . Then, from the normalization that was recorded in lemma 4.1, we can read off . Now, using ordinary AM–GM together with the first-moment estimate that was selected above, we can then go on to obtain
| (13) |
Also, Proposition 14.2 in Pasten is given with respect to exactly this hyperbolic metric, and therefore we can see that it implies
Now, using his height formula [12, Theorem 13.2] in the form in which it is recorded there, after the functional equation has been applied, we can go on to obtain
Then, combining these formulas, and using together with , and together with the logarithmic-derivative estimate that was retained above, we can now go on to deduce that
| (14) |
In preparation for the final step of the argument, we will now single out the one consequence of Pasten’s modular-degree comparison that is used there.
Proposition 5.1 (Pasten interface).
For the Frey branch and for an admissible factorization which has the property that is divisible by at least two odd primes, we have the following estimate
uniformly in the admissible factorization.
Proof.
Now, from Pasten’s Theorem 6.1(b.2), what we can read off is
Using the degree relations (16.1)–(16.3), which are combined in [12, Theorem 16.1, pp. 305–307] and invoked in his Theorem 16.5(ii), we can then go on to read off the estimate
Now the minimal isogeny has degree at most by an application of the Mazur–Kenku theorem, in the form in which it is recorded in [12, proof of Theorem 16.1]. Thus the difference between the two terms which are associated with the Faltings height is . In the same normalization, the classical estimate of , the Manin constant estimate that is due to Pasten [12, Theorem 1.1 and proof of Theorem 16.1], and the bound together imply that for sufficiently large the right-hand side is at most
Finally, the non-normalized Petersson norms of Pasten take into account the same physical hyperbolic measure [12, Section 4.6], and therefore we can conclude that . All constants just used are absolute or depend only on (the Manin-constant theorem is applied with the fixed exceptional set ), so the estimate is uniform in . This proves the statement while additionally showing explicitly that the Frey branch contributes no further factor of . ∎
For every factorization satisfying the hypothesis of proposition 5.1, applying it to (14) gives us the cell estimate
| (15) |
The implied constant in (15) is uniform in the admissible factorization.
It remains to distribute the factor . In what follows we write the odd part of as , but the bounded factor remains. If exceeds a fixed cutoff, then we can be sure that all subsequent levels contain at least two odd primes, as required in proposition 5.1. In the even case is even, and in the odd case is even. As a result, each described below is an admissible indefinite quaternion discriminant and after the fixed cutoff has been increased, will exceed 1. Moreover , and all constants are uniform in . We then take each entry and apply to it the sieve, the pair estimates, the first-moment selection, and the Pasten interface. Note that the selected field can depend on and that the earlier established uniformity makes the cell estimate independent of . If is even, apply (15) cyclically with
We can note that all valuations occur on left-hand sides, and that all odd primes are included in two . If , let be the uniform implied constant in (15). Multiplication gives
Since for even and , taking the -nd root leaves at most the bounded constant . Thus
| (16) |
If is odd, use cyclic triples
for which
Here for odd , so the rooted constant is at most . Consequently
| (17) |
If for the chosen fixed cutoff, then we can see that . We can first employ Pasten’s Proposition 15.1 with a smaller internal epsilon and then select the maximum over these finitely many values, which gives [12, Proposition 15.1]. From his Lemma 15.2 we can read off [12, Lemma 15.2 and Equation (16.4)], and the Frey conductor satisfies . Finally,
In this last step we needed to use the inequality , and we needed it for each positive integer value at the odd primes in question.
Given , we first need to choose a fixed for which holds. In the next step we need to ensure that the combined internal epsilon loss is below and we need to select the prime-count cutoff such that both the overheads in (16)–(17) fall below above it. Here we can rely on Proposition 15.1 of Pasten, which takes care of those cases where is equal to or lower than our cutoff. The finitely many conductors below the previously established thresholds end up in the implied constant, and we do not track the effective dependence of that constant on . With that we have proved theorem 1.1.
Remark 5.2.
We attain the exponent in the proof by means of the discriminant scale . We see that the above reasoning does not prove the abc conjecture. In fact, we note that it handles only the product of valuation exponents and the divisor function, not itself.
Notation
| radical of the triple | |
| , | valuation product and divisor function |
| indefinite quaternion division algebra over | |
| (in §5) | number of bad discriminants |
| , | trace-zero space and its quadratic form |
| full polarization of , so | |
| discriminant of | |
| Eichler level | |
| reduced discriminant of , and the Frey conductor | |
| Eichler order of reduced discriminant | |
| norm-one units modulo | |
| upper half plane | |
| the Shimura curve | |
| its hyperbolic volume | |
| Gross lattice of [3, Equation (2.9)] | |
| , | local projective unit image and its product |
| , | characteristic matrix, and its norm-one class set |
| , | local integral-coset set and its cardinality |
| , | odd fundamental CM discriminants |
| class number of | |
| the complete -element Galois multiset | |
| the CM discriminant scale | |
| a multiset of CM centers with | |
| bound on multiplicities in | |
| the full Galois CM multiset | |
| number of ordered pairs of within | |
| number of discriminants produced by Pasten’s sieve | |
| , | sieve parameters |
| holomorphic differential on , in §5 | |
| its non-normalized Petersson norm | |
| the unitary normalization | |
| first absolute moment of over | |
| sampling multiplicity of the balls | |
| , | fixed hyperbolic radii |
| , | moment exponent and cell exponent |
| discriminant of the Frey curve |
References
- [1] Montserrat Alsina and Dimitrios Chatzakos, CM-points and lattice counting on arithmetic compact Riemann surfaces, Journal of Number Theory 212 (2020), 339–353.
- [2] Valentin Blomer and Roman Holowinsky, Bounding sup-norms of cusp forms of large level, Inventiones Mathematicae 179 (2010), no. 3, 645–681.
- [3] Jan Hendrik Bruinier, Yingkun Li, and Martin Möller, Intersections of special cycles on Shimura curves and Siegel Maass forms, 2026, arXiv:2602.16248v1 [math.NT], February 2026.
- [4] Soumya Das and Jyoti Sengupta, norms of holomorphic modular forms in the case of compact quotient, Forum Mathematicum 27 (2015), no. 4, 1987–2001.
- [5] Gergely Harcos and Philippe Michel, The subconvexity problem for Rankin–Selberg L-functions and equidistribution of Heegner points. II, Inventiones Mathematicae 163 (2006), 581–655.
- [6] Peter Humphries and Maksym Radziwiłł, Optimal small scale equidistribution of lattice points on the sphere, Heegner points, and closed geodesics, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 75 (2022), 1936–1996.
- [7] Ilya Khayutin, Joint equidistribution of CM points, Annals of Mathematics 189 (2019), no. 1, 145–276.
- [8] Stephen S. Kudla, Michael Rapoport, and Tonghai Yang, Modular forms and special cycles on Shimura curves, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 161, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2006.
- [9] Sheng-Chi Liu, Riad Masri, and Matthew P. Young, Subconvexity and equidistribution of Heegner points in the level aspect, Compositio Mathematica 149 (2013), 1150–1174.
- [10] Philippe Michel, The subconvexity problem for Rankin–Selberg L-functions and equidistribution of Heegner points, Annals of Mathematics 160 (2004), no. 1, 185–236.
- [11] Oana Padurariu and Frederick Saia, Bielliptic Shimura curves with nontrivial level, Research in Number Theory 11 (2025), no. 1, Paper No. 2, 23 pp., Correction, ibid. 11 (2025), no. 4, Paper No. 98; arXiv:2401.08829 [math.NT].
- [12] Hector Pasten, Shimura curves and the conjecture, Journal of Number Theory 254 (2024), 214–335.
- [13] Hector Pasten and Rocío Sepúlveda-Manzo, On the and the conjectures, Bulletin of the Brazilian Mathematical Society, New Series 56 (2025), no. 4, 54, arXiv:2406.05083 [math.NT].
- [14] John G. Ratcliffe, Foundations of hyperbolic manifolds, third ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 149, Springer, Cham, 2019.
- [15] James Rickards, Counting intersection numbers of closed geodesics on Shimura curves, Research in Number Theory 9 (2023), no. 2, Article 20.
- [16] John Voight, Quaternion algebras, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 288, Springer, Cham, 2021.
- [17] Andreas Wieser and Pengyu Yang, A uniform Linnik basic lemma and entropy bounds, 2026, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, published online January 22, 2026; arXiv:2201.05380 [math.NT].
- [18] Xinyi Yuan and Shou-Wu Zhang, On the averaged Colmez conjecture, Annals of Mathematics 187 (2018), no. 2, 533–638.
- [19] Shou-Wu Zhang, Heights of Heegner points on Shimura curves, Annals of Mathematics 153 (2001), no. 1, 27–147.
- [20] by same author, Equidistribution of CM-points on quaternion Shimura varieties, International Mathematics Research Notices (2005), no. 59, 3657–3689.